Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile in South Africa.

<h4>Background</h4>Clostridioides difficile (CD) is the most common healthcare-associated enteric infection. There is currently limited epidemiological evidence on CD incidence in South Africa.<h4>Aim</h4>To estimate the burden of CD infection (CDI) in the South African publi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pieter de Jager, Oliver Smith, Stefan Bolon, Juno Thomas, Guy A Richards
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259771
_version_ 1798035280039510016
author Pieter de Jager
Oliver Smith
Stefan Bolon
Juno Thomas
Guy A Richards
author_facet Pieter de Jager
Oliver Smith
Stefan Bolon
Juno Thomas
Guy A Richards
author_sort Pieter de Jager
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Clostridioides difficile (CD) is the most common healthcare-associated enteric infection. There is currently limited epidemiological evidence on CD incidence in South Africa.<h4>Aim</h4>To estimate the burden of CD infection (CDI) in the South African public sector between 1 July 2016 and 30 June 2017.<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective cohort study utilizing secondary data was conducted to describe the epidemiology of CD in South Africa. We assessed the patient-level association between variables of interest, CD, and CD recurrence, by undertaking both univariate and multivariable analysis. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) were calculated utilizing multivariable Poisson regression. The incidence of CD, CD recurrence and CD testing was estimated by Poisson regression for various levels of care and provinces.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 14 023 samples were tested for CD during the study period. After applying exclusion criteria, we were left with a sample of 10 053 of which 1 860 (18.50%) tested CD positive. A positive and significant association between CDI and level of care is found, with patients treated in specialized tuberculosis (TB) hospitals having a five-fold increased adjusted incidence risk ratio (aIRR) for CDI (aIRR 4.96 CI95% 4.08-6.04,) compared to those managed in primary care. Patients receiving care at a secondary, tertiary, or central hospital had 35%, 66% and 41% increased adjusted incidence of CDI compared to those managed in primary care, respectively. National incidence of CDI is estimated at 53.89 cases per 100 000 hospitalizations (CI95% 51.58-56.29), the incidence of recurrence at 21.39 (CI95% 15.06-29.48) cases per 1 000 cases and a recurrence rate of 2.14% (CI95% 1.51-2.94).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Compared to European countries, we found a comparable incidence of CD. However, our estimates are lower than those for the United States. Compared to high-income countries, this study found a comparatively lower CD recurrence.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:56:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e330dfac0f10433480b983b9c5a48b6d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:56:00Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-e330dfac0f10433480b983b9c5a48b6d2022-12-22T04:03:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-011611e025977110.1371/journal.pone.0259771Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile in South Africa.Pieter de JagerOliver SmithStefan BolonJuno ThomasGuy A Richards<h4>Background</h4>Clostridioides difficile (CD) is the most common healthcare-associated enteric infection. There is currently limited epidemiological evidence on CD incidence in South Africa.<h4>Aim</h4>To estimate the burden of CD infection (CDI) in the South African public sector between 1 July 2016 and 30 June 2017.<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective cohort study utilizing secondary data was conducted to describe the epidemiology of CD in South Africa. We assessed the patient-level association between variables of interest, CD, and CD recurrence, by undertaking both univariate and multivariable analysis. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) were calculated utilizing multivariable Poisson regression. The incidence of CD, CD recurrence and CD testing was estimated by Poisson regression for various levels of care and provinces.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 14 023 samples were tested for CD during the study period. After applying exclusion criteria, we were left with a sample of 10 053 of which 1 860 (18.50%) tested CD positive. A positive and significant association between CDI and level of care is found, with patients treated in specialized tuberculosis (TB) hospitals having a five-fold increased adjusted incidence risk ratio (aIRR) for CDI (aIRR 4.96 CI95% 4.08-6.04,) compared to those managed in primary care. Patients receiving care at a secondary, tertiary, or central hospital had 35%, 66% and 41% increased adjusted incidence of CDI compared to those managed in primary care, respectively. National incidence of CDI is estimated at 53.89 cases per 100 000 hospitalizations (CI95% 51.58-56.29), the incidence of recurrence at 21.39 (CI95% 15.06-29.48) cases per 1 000 cases and a recurrence rate of 2.14% (CI95% 1.51-2.94).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Compared to European countries, we found a comparable incidence of CD. However, our estimates are lower than those for the United States. Compared to high-income countries, this study found a comparatively lower CD recurrence.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259771
spellingShingle Pieter de Jager
Oliver Smith
Stefan Bolon
Juno Thomas
Guy A Richards
Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile in South Africa.
PLoS ONE
title Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile in South Africa.
title_full Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile in South Africa.
title_fullStr Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile in South Africa.
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile in South Africa.
title_short Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile in South Africa.
title_sort epidemiology of clostridioides difficile in south africa
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259771
work_keys_str_mv AT pieterdejager epidemiologyofclostridioidesdifficileinsouthafrica
AT oliversmith epidemiologyofclostridioidesdifficileinsouthafrica
AT stefanbolon epidemiologyofclostridioidesdifficileinsouthafrica
AT junothomas epidemiologyofclostridioidesdifficileinsouthafrica
AT guyarichards epidemiologyofclostridioidesdifficileinsouthafrica