Politica Instinctului Naţiunei

Nothing predicted or announced after the outbreak and during the Great war the unification of the territory between the Prut and the Nistru River, with the Kingdom of Roamania on 27 March 1918. Bessarabia seemed lost for the Romanian cause.The geopolitics of time required the Romanian state choose t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Radu GĂINĂ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editura Institutul European Iasi 2018-06-01
Series:Polis: Revista de Stiinte Politice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistapolis.ro/documente/revista/2018/Nr-1-20-2018/19.%20Radu%20GAINA.pdf
_version_ 1818616866264842240
author Radu GĂINĂ
author_facet Radu GĂINĂ
author_sort Radu GĂINĂ
collection DOAJ
description Nothing predicted or announced after the outbreak and during the Great war the unification of the territory between the Prut and the Nistru River, with the Kingdom of Roamania on 27 March 1918. Bessarabia seemed lost for the Romanian cause.The geopolitics of time required the Romanian state choose the alliance with Antanta, a group of forces that included Englands, France and Tsarist Empire, and as a consequence, Romania had to give up its claim to bring back the province abducted from the body of Moldavia by this power in 1812. The issue sparked a lively debate in the Romanian society and the meeting of the Romanian Parliament in late 1915, during the debates on the Message of the Throne, in his speech Constantin Stere stated:”A nation can not live without an ideal.”At the same meeting, Take Ionescu replied to the main followers of the war against Russia, Constantin Stere and P.P. Carp. P.P. Carp argued that politics is a matter of morality an not of interest, and Take’s golden mouth, as the leaderof the democratic conservatives in Romania was called , said that at that time the”policy of the nation’s instinct” was imposed.Take Ionescu had a free thinking and had no anti-Russian phobias, and moreover, if he pragmatically balanced what could win the Romanian state from the alliance with Antanta, then it was clear that Romania had to enter the war alongside this grouping of forces, however, the same political person was no longer as easy as an attitude at the end of 1917, when his girlfriend Adela Cordescu was in Odessa, and this fact made him less intransigent with the actions of the Bolshevik troops an anarchists, which caused disorder an chaos in Socola - Iasi. P.P. Carp did not owe him, and, characterizing Take Ionescu’s personality, said that “as beauty does not justify all prostitution, talent does not justify all incarnations.”.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T16:56:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e332dcb821104bd8b55fc6cd44159956
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1221-9762
2344-5750
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T16:56:36Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Editura Institutul European Iasi
record_format Article
series Polis: Revista de Stiinte Politice
spelling doaj.art-e332dcb821104bd8b55fc6cd441599562022-12-21T22:23:52ZengEditura Institutul European IasiPolis: Revista de Stiinte Politice1221-97622344-57502018-06-01VI2(20)285295Politica Instinctului NaţiuneiRadu GĂINĂNothing predicted or announced after the outbreak and during the Great war the unification of the territory between the Prut and the Nistru River, with the Kingdom of Roamania on 27 March 1918. Bessarabia seemed lost for the Romanian cause.The geopolitics of time required the Romanian state choose the alliance with Antanta, a group of forces that included Englands, France and Tsarist Empire, and as a consequence, Romania had to give up its claim to bring back the province abducted from the body of Moldavia by this power in 1812. The issue sparked a lively debate in the Romanian society and the meeting of the Romanian Parliament in late 1915, during the debates on the Message of the Throne, in his speech Constantin Stere stated:”A nation can not live without an ideal.”At the same meeting, Take Ionescu replied to the main followers of the war against Russia, Constantin Stere and P.P. Carp. P.P. Carp argued that politics is a matter of morality an not of interest, and Take’s golden mouth, as the leaderof the democratic conservatives in Romania was called , said that at that time the”policy of the nation’s instinct” was imposed.Take Ionescu had a free thinking and had no anti-Russian phobias, and moreover, if he pragmatically balanced what could win the Romanian state from the alliance with Antanta, then it was clear that Romania had to enter the war alongside this grouping of forces, however, the same political person was no longer as easy as an attitude at the end of 1917, when his girlfriend Adela Cordescu was in Odessa, and this fact made him less intransigent with the actions of the Bolshevik troops an anarchists, which caused disorder an chaos in Socola - Iasi. P.P. Carp did not owe him, and, characterizing Take Ionescu’s personality, said that “as beauty does not justify all prostitution, talent does not justify all incarnations.”.http://revistapolis.ro/documente/revista/2018/Nr-1-20-2018/19.%20Radu%20GAINA.pdfmarele războibasarabiaunirelimba românăunionism
spellingShingle Radu GĂINĂ
Politica Instinctului Naţiunei
Polis: Revista de Stiinte Politice
marele război
basarabia
unire
limba română
unionism
title Politica Instinctului Naţiunei
title_full Politica Instinctului Naţiunei
title_fullStr Politica Instinctului Naţiunei
title_full_unstemmed Politica Instinctului Naţiunei
title_short Politica Instinctului Naţiunei
title_sort politica instinctului natiunei
topic marele război
basarabia
unire
limba română
unionism
url http://revistapolis.ro/documente/revista/2018/Nr-1-20-2018/19.%20Radu%20GAINA.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT radugaina politicainstinctuluinatiunei