Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality?

ABSTRACT Soil and crop management systems change the soil structure, thereby affecting soil quality. The “profil cultural” method (PCM) has been used to identify the effects of management systems on soil structure; however, few studies relate the structures identified by the PCM to quantitative indi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafaela Watanabe, Cássio Antonio Tormena, Maria de Fátima Guimarães, João Tavares Filho, Ricardo Ralisch, Julio Franchini, Henrique Debiasi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 2018-02-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832018000100510&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818970307607658496
author Rafaela Watanabe
Cássio Antonio Tormena
Maria de Fátima Guimarães
João Tavares Filho
Ricardo Ralisch
Julio Franchini
Henrique Debiasi
author_facet Rafaela Watanabe
Cássio Antonio Tormena
Maria de Fátima Guimarães
João Tavares Filho
Ricardo Ralisch
Julio Franchini
Henrique Debiasi
author_sort Rafaela Watanabe
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Soil and crop management systems change the soil structure, thereby affecting soil quality. The “profil cultural” method (PCM) has been used to identify the effects of management systems on soil structure; however, few studies relate the structures identified by the PCM to quantitative indicators of soil structural quality. This study aimed to quantify soil structures using the PCM and relate these structures to bulk density (Bd), critical bulk density (Bdc), soil aeration capacity (εa), least limiting water range (LLWR), and soil air permeability (Ka) under different soil and crop management systems. The study was developed in a long-term experiment (24 years) involving two systems of soil management (no-tillage and conventional tillage) and two systems of crop management (rotation and succession), resulting in four treatments: no-tillage with crop rotation (NTr), no-tillage with crop succession (NTs), conventional tillage with heavy harrowing and crop rotation (CTr) and conventional tillage with heavy harrowing and crop succession (CTs). The PCM was used to identify the different homogeneous morphological units (HMUs) in the soil profile. Undisturbed soil samples were collected for the HMUs that were most represented in the profiles to determine Ka, LLWR, Bd, and εa. There was agreement between the HMUs and the quantitative indicators. The LLWR showed greater values for Bdc under no-tillage (NTr = 1.36 Mg m-3 and NTs = 1.37 Mg m-3) than under conventional tillage (CTs = 1.31 Mg m-3 and CTr = 1.33 mg m-3). The proportion of samples where Bd > Bdc was 23 % under CTs, 77 % under CTr, 32 % under NTs, and 39 % under NTr. The structures that were most restrictive to root development (CΔ, CΔμ, FmtΔμ, and FmtμΔ) show a lower Ka and greater soil penetration resistance as the soil dries. Pores are more continuous and the structure is less restrictive to plant development in no-tillage than in conventional tillage.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T14:34:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e343677ef23642a0a57291d3c0934a49
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1806-9657
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T14:34:24Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
spelling doaj.art-e343677ef23642a0a57291d3c0934a492022-12-21T19:37:30ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ciência do SoloRevista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo1806-96572018-02-0142010.1590/18069657rbcs20160393S0100-06832018000100510Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality?Rafaela WatanabeCássio Antonio TormenaMaria de Fátima GuimarãesJoão Tavares FilhoRicardo RalischJulio FranchiniHenrique DebiasiABSTRACT Soil and crop management systems change the soil structure, thereby affecting soil quality. The “profil cultural” method (PCM) has been used to identify the effects of management systems on soil structure; however, few studies relate the structures identified by the PCM to quantitative indicators of soil structural quality. This study aimed to quantify soil structures using the PCM and relate these structures to bulk density (Bd), critical bulk density (Bdc), soil aeration capacity (εa), least limiting water range (LLWR), and soil air permeability (Ka) under different soil and crop management systems. The study was developed in a long-term experiment (24 years) involving two systems of soil management (no-tillage and conventional tillage) and two systems of crop management (rotation and succession), resulting in four treatments: no-tillage with crop rotation (NTr), no-tillage with crop succession (NTs), conventional tillage with heavy harrowing and crop rotation (CTr) and conventional tillage with heavy harrowing and crop succession (CTs). The PCM was used to identify the different homogeneous morphological units (HMUs) in the soil profile. Undisturbed soil samples were collected for the HMUs that were most represented in the profiles to determine Ka, LLWR, Bd, and εa. There was agreement between the HMUs and the quantitative indicators. The LLWR showed greater values for Bdc under no-tillage (NTr = 1.36 Mg m-3 and NTs = 1.37 Mg m-3) than under conventional tillage (CTs = 1.31 Mg m-3 and CTr = 1.33 mg m-3). The proportion of samples where Bd > Bdc was 23 % under CTs, 77 % under CTr, 32 % under NTs, and 39 % under NTr. The structures that were most restrictive to root development (CΔ, CΔμ, FmtΔμ, and FmtμΔ) show a lower Ka and greater soil penetration resistance as the soil dries. Pores are more continuous and the structure is less restrictive to plant development in no-tillage than in conventional tillage.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832018000100510&lng=en&tlng=enleast limiting water rangeair permeabilityno-tillageconventional tillage
spellingShingle Rafaela Watanabe
Cássio Antonio Tormena
Maria de Fátima Guimarães
João Tavares Filho
Ricardo Ralisch
Julio Franchini
Henrique Debiasi
Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality?
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
least limiting water range
air permeability
no-tillage
conventional tillage
title Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality?
title_full Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality?
title_fullStr Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality?
title_full_unstemmed Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality?
title_short Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality?
title_sort is structural quality as assessed by the profil cultural method related to quantitative indicators of soil physical quality
topic least limiting water range
air permeability
no-tillage
conventional tillage
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832018000100510&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT rafaelawatanabe isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality
AT cassioantoniotormena isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality
AT mariadefatimaguimaraes isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality
AT joaotavaresfilho isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality
AT ricardoralisch isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality
AT juliofranchini isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality
AT henriquedebiasi isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality