Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality?
ABSTRACT Soil and crop management systems change the soil structure, thereby affecting soil quality. The “profil cultural” method (PCM) has been used to identify the effects of management systems on soil structure; however, few studies relate the structures identified by the PCM to quantitative indi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832018000100510&lng=en&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1818970307607658496 |
---|---|
author | Rafaela Watanabe Cássio Antonio Tormena Maria de Fátima Guimarães João Tavares Filho Ricardo Ralisch Julio Franchini Henrique Debiasi |
author_facet | Rafaela Watanabe Cássio Antonio Tormena Maria de Fátima Guimarães João Tavares Filho Ricardo Ralisch Julio Franchini Henrique Debiasi |
author_sort | Rafaela Watanabe |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ABSTRACT Soil and crop management systems change the soil structure, thereby affecting soil quality. The “profil cultural” method (PCM) has been used to identify the effects of management systems on soil structure; however, few studies relate the structures identified by the PCM to quantitative indicators of soil structural quality. This study aimed to quantify soil structures using the PCM and relate these structures to bulk density (Bd), critical bulk density (Bdc), soil aeration capacity (εa), least limiting water range (LLWR), and soil air permeability (Ka) under different soil and crop management systems. The study was developed in a long-term experiment (24 years) involving two systems of soil management (no-tillage and conventional tillage) and two systems of crop management (rotation and succession), resulting in four treatments: no-tillage with crop rotation (NTr), no-tillage with crop succession (NTs), conventional tillage with heavy harrowing and crop rotation (CTr) and conventional tillage with heavy harrowing and crop succession (CTs). The PCM was used to identify the different homogeneous morphological units (HMUs) in the soil profile. Undisturbed soil samples were collected for the HMUs that were most represented in the profiles to determine Ka, LLWR, Bd, and εa. There was agreement between the HMUs and the quantitative indicators. The LLWR showed greater values for Bdc under no-tillage (NTr = 1.36 Mg m-3 and NTs = 1.37 Mg m-3) than under conventional tillage (CTs = 1.31 Mg m-3 and CTr = 1.33 mg m-3). The proportion of samples where Bd > Bdc was 23 % under CTs, 77 % under CTr, 32 % under NTs, and 39 % under NTr. The structures that were most restrictive to root development (CΔ, CΔμ, FmtΔμ, and FmtμΔ) show a lower Ka and greater soil penetration resistance as the soil dries. Pores are more continuous and the structure is less restrictive to plant development in no-tillage than in conventional tillage. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T14:34:24Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e343677ef23642a0a57291d3c0934a49 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1806-9657 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T14:34:24Z |
publishDate | 2018-02-01 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo |
spelling | doaj.art-e343677ef23642a0a57291d3c0934a492022-12-21T19:37:30ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ciência do SoloRevista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo1806-96572018-02-0142010.1590/18069657rbcs20160393S0100-06832018000100510Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality?Rafaela WatanabeCássio Antonio TormenaMaria de Fátima GuimarãesJoão Tavares FilhoRicardo RalischJulio FranchiniHenrique DebiasiABSTRACT Soil and crop management systems change the soil structure, thereby affecting soil quality. The “profil cultural” method (PCM) has been used to identify the effects of management systems on soil structure; however, few studies relate the structures identified by the PCM to quantitative indicators of soil structural quality. This study aimed to quantify soil structures using the PCM and relate these structures to bulk density (Bd), critical bulk density (Bdc), soil aeration capacity (εa), least limiting water range (LLWR), and soil air permeability (Ka) under different soil and crop management systems. The study was developed in a long-term experiment (24 years) involving two systems of soil management (no-tillage and conventional tillage) and two systems of crop management (rotation and succession), resulting in four treatments: no-tillage with crop rotation (NTr), no-tillage with crop succession (NTs), conventional tillage with heavy harrowing and crop rotation (CTr) and conventional tillage with heavy harrowing and crop succession (CTs). The PCM was used to identify the different homogeneous morphological units (HMUs) in the soil profile. Undisturbed soil samples were collected for the HMUs that were most represented in the profiles to determine Ka, LLWR, Bd, and εa. There was agreement between the HMUs and the quantitative indicators. The LLWR showed greater values for Bdc under no-tillage (NTr = 1.36 Mg m-3 and NTs = 1.37 Mg m-3) than under conventional tillage (CTs = 1.31 Mg m-3 and CTr = 1.33 mg m-3). The proportion of samples where Bd > Bdc was 23 % under CTs, 77 % under CTr, 32 % under NTs, and 39 % under NTr. The structures that were most restrictive to root development (CΔ, CΔμ, FmtΔμ, and FmtμΔ) show a lower Ka and greater soil penetration resistance as the soil dries. Pores are more continuous and the structure is less restrictive to plant development in no-tillage than in conventional tillage.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832018000100510&lng=en&tlng=enleast limiting water rangeair permeabilityno-tillageconventional tillage |
spellingShingle | Rafaela Watanabe Cássio Antonio Tormena Maria de Fátima Guimarães João Tavares Filho Ricardo Ralisch Julio Franchini Henrique Debiasi Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality? Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo least limiting water range air permeability no-tillage conventional tillage |
title | Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality? |
title_full | Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality? |
title_fullStr | Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality? |
title_short | Is Structural Quality as Assessed by the "Profil Cultural" Method Related to Quantitative Indicators of Soil Physical Quality? |
title_sort | is structural quality as assessed by the profil cultural method related to quantitative indicators of soil physical quality |
topic | least limiting water range air permeability no-tillage conventional tillage |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832018000100510&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rafaelawatanabe isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality AT cassioantoniotormena isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality AT mariadefatimaguimaraes isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality AT joaotavaresfilho isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality AT ricardoralisch isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality AT juliofranchini isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality AT henriquedebiasi isstructuralqualityasassessedbytheprofilculturalmethodrelatedtoquantitativeindicatorsofsoilphysicalquality |