Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Proximal femoral bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty often requires bypassing the deficient metaphyseal bone to obtain distal fixation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of stem diameter and length of diaph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paprosky Wayne G, Jacobs Joshua J, Berger Richard A, Hallab Nadim J, Meneghini R Michael, Rosenberg Aaron G
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-10-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Online Access:http://www.josr-online.com/content/1/1/5
_version_ 1811305609071427584
author Paprosky Wayne G
Jacobs Joshua J
Berger Richard A
Hallab Nadim J
Meneghini R Michael
Rosenberg Aaron G
author_facet Paprosky Wayne G
Jacobs Joshua J
Berger Richard A
Hallab Nadim J
Meneghini R Michael
Rosenberg Aaron G
author_sort Paprosky Wayne G
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Proximal femoral bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty often requires bypassing the deficient metaphyseal bone to obtain distal fixation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of stem diameter and length of diaphyseal contact in achieving rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Twenty-four cadaveric femoral specimens were implanted with a fully porous-coated stem. Two different diameters were tested and the stems were implanted at multiple contact lengths without proximal bone support. Each specimen underwent torsional testing to failure and rotational micromotion was measured at the implant-bone interface.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The larger stem diameter demonstrated a greater torsional stability for a given length of cortical contact (p ≤ 0.05). Decreasing length of diaphyseal contact length was associated with less torsional stability. Torsional resistance was inconsistent at 2 cm of depth.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Larger stem diameters frequently used in revisions may be associated with less diaphyseal contact length to achieve equivalent rotational stability compared to smaller diameter stems. Furthermore, a minimum of 3 cm or 4 cm of diaphyseal contact with a porous-coated stem should be achieved in proximal femoral bone deficiency and will likely be dependent on the stem diameter utilized at the time of surgery.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T08:29:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e35e008c558e430991544712830c045f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T08:29:29Z
publishDate 2006-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-e35e008c558e430991544712830c045f2022-12-22T02:54:19ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2006-10-0111510.1186/1749-799X-1-5Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysisPaprosky Wayne GJacobs Joshua JBerger Richard AHallab Nadim JMeneghini R MichaelRosenberg Aaron G<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Proximal femoral bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty often requires bypassing the deficient metaphyseal bone to obtain distal fixation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of stem diameter and length of diaphyseal contact in achieving rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Twenty-four cadaveric femoral specimens were implanted with a fully porous-coated stem. Two different diameters were tested and the stems were implanted at multiple contact lengths without proximal bone support. Each specimen underwent torsional testing to failure and rotational micromotion was measured at the implant-bone interface.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The larger stem diameter demonstrated a greater torsional stability for a given length of cortical contact (p ≤ 0.05). Decreasing length of diaphyseal contact length was associated with less torsional stability. Torsional resistance was inconsistent at 2 cm of depth.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Larger stem diameters frequently used in revisions may be associated with less diaphyseal contact length to achieve equivalent rotational stability compared to smaller diameter stems. Furthermore, a minimum of 3 cm or 4 cm of diaphyseal contact with a porous-coated stem should be achieved in proximal femoral bone deficiency and will likely be dependent on the stem diameter utilized at the time of surgery.</p>http://www.josr-online.com/content/1/1/5
spellingShingle Paprosky Wayne G
Jacobs Joshua J
Berger Richard A
Hallab Nadim J
Meneghini R Michael
Rosenberg Aaron G
Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
title Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
title_full Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
title_fullStr Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
title_full_unstemmed Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
title_short Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
title_sort stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty a biomechanical analysis
url http://www.josr-online.com/content/1/1/5
work_keys_str_mv AT paproskywayneg stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis
AT jacobsjoshuaj stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis
AT bergerricharda stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis
AT hallabnadimj stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis
AT meneghinirmichael stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis
AT rosenbergaarong stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis