Tumor Contrast-Enhancement for Monitoring of PRRT 177Lu-DOTATATE in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients

Background: Therapy monitoring of cancer treatment by contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), applying response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria version 1. 1 (RECIST 1.1) is less suitable for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) which, when responding, tend to show stabilization rather than shrinkage. New...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olof Pettersson, Katarzyna Fröss-Baron, Joakim Crona, Anders Sundin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00193/full
_version_ 1819000638451744768
author Olof Pettersson
Katarzyna Fröss-Baron
Joakim Crona
Anders Sundin
author_facet Olof Pettersson
Katarzyna Fröss-Baron
Joakim Crona
Anders Sundin
author_sort Olof Pettersson
collection DOAJ
description Background: Therapy monitoring of cancer treatment by contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), applying response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria version 1. 1 (RECIST 1.1) is less suitable for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) which, when responding, tend to show stabilization rather than shrinkage. New methods are needed to further classify patients in order to identify non-responders at an early stage and avoid unnecessary adverse effects and costs. Changes in arterial tumor attenuation and contrast-enhancement could be used to identify the effect of therapy, perhaps even in early stages of treatment.Methods: Patients with metastatic pancreatic NETs (PNETs) receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE underwent CECT at baseline, mid-treatment (PRRT cycles 3–5) and at follow-up, 3 months after the last PRRT cycle. At baseline CECT, the liver metastasis with the highest arterial attenuation was identified in each patient. The fold changes in arterial tumor attenuation (Hounsfield Units, HU), contrast-enhancement (HU), and transversal tumor area (cm2) between CECT at baseline, mid-treatment and follow-up were calculated. Correlation of the tumor metrics to outcome parameters such as progression-free survival (PFS) and time to best response was performed.Results: Fifty-two patients were included (27 men, 25 women), median age 60 years (range 29–80), median Ki-67 8% (range 1–30). Six patients had grade 1 PNETs, forty had grade 2 and four had grade 3 tumors. As an internal control, it was first tested and established that the tumor contrast-enhancement was not merely related to that of the abdominal aorta. The mean ± SD arterial attenuation of the liver metastases was similar at baseline, 217 ± 62 HU and at mid-treatment, 238 ± 80 HU and then decreased to 198 ± 62 HU at follow-up, compared to baseline (p = 0.024, n = 52) and mid-treatment (p = 0.0004, n = 43). The transversal tumor area decreased 25% between baseline and follow-up (p = 0.013, n = 52). Tumor contrast-enhancement increased slightly from baseline to mid-treatment and these fold changes correlated with PFS (R2 = 0.33, p = 0.0002, n = 37) and with time to best response (R2 = 0.34, p < 0.0001, n = 37).Conclusions: Early changes in contrast-enhancement and arterial attenuation in PNET liver metastases may for CECT monitoring of PRRT yield complementary information to evaluation by RECIST 1.1.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T22:36:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e35ee60cab1b4146925760915873108b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T22:36:30Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-e35ee60cab1b4146925760915873108b2022-12-21T19:24:35ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-02-011010.3389/fonc.2020.00193495812Tumor Contrast-Enhancement for Monitoring of PRRT 177Lu-DOTATATE in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor PatientsOlof Pettersson0Katarzyna Fröss-Baron1Joakim Crona2Anders Sundin3Section of Radiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenSection of Radiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenBackground: Therapy monitoring of cancer treatment by contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), applying response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria version 1. 1 (RECIST 1.1) is less suitable for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) which, when responding, tend to show stabilization rather than shrinkage. New methods are needed to further classify patients in order to identify non-responders at an early stage and avoid unnecessary adverse effects and costs. Changes in arterial tumor attenuation and contrast-enhancement could be used to identify the effect of therapy, perhaps even in early stages of treatment.Methods: Patients with metastatic pancreatic NETs (PNETs) receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE underwent CECT at baseline, mid-treatment (PRRT cycles 3–5) and at follow-up, 3 months after the last PRRT cycle. At baseline CECT, the liver metastasis with the highest arterial attenuation was identified in each patient. The fold changes in arterial tumor attenuation (Hounsfield Units, HU), contrast-enhancement (HU), and transversal tumor area (cm2) between CECT at baseline, mid-treatment and follow-up were calculated. Correlation of the tumor metrics to outcome parameters such as progression-free survival (PFS) and time to best response was performed.Results: Fifty-two patients were included (27 men, 25 women), median age 60 years (range 29–80), median Ki-67 8% (range 1–30). Six patients had grade 1 PNETs, forty had grade 2 and four had grade 3 tumors. As an internal control, it was first tested and established that the tumor contrast-enhancement was not merely related to that of the abdominal aorta. The mean ± SD arterial attenuation of the liver metastases was similar at baseline, 217 ± 62 HU and at mid-treatment, 238 ± 80 HU and then decreased to 198 ± 62 HU at follow-up, compared to baseline (p = 0.024, n = 52) and mid-treatment (p = 0.0004, n = 43). The transversal tumor area decreased 25% between baseline and follow-up (p = 0.013, n = 52). Tumor contrast-enhancement increased slightly from baseline to mid-treatment and these fold changes correlated with PFS (R2 = 0.33, p = 0.0002, n = 37) and with time to best response (R2 = 0.34, p < 0.0001, n = 37).Conclusions: Early changes in contrast-enhancement and arterial attenuation in PNET liver metastases may for CECT monitoring of PRRT yield complementary information to evaluation by RECIST 1.1.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00193/fulltherapy monitoringneuroendocrine tumorcomputed tomographycontrast-enhancementNETCT
spellingShingle Olof Pettersson
Katarzyna Fröss-Baron
Joakim Crona
Anders Sundin
Tumor Contrast-Enhancement for Monitoring of PRRT 177Lu-DOTATATE in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients
Frontiers in Oncology
therapy monitoring
neuroendocrine tumor
computed tomography
contrast-enhancement
NET
CT
title Tumor Contrast-Enhancement for Monitoring of PRRT 177Lu-DOTATATE in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients
title_full Tumor Contrast-Enhancement for Monitoring of PRRT 177Lu-DOTATATE in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients
title_fullStr Tumor Contrast-Enhancement for Monitoring of PRRT 177Lu-DOTATATE in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients
title_full_unstemmed Tumor Contrast-Enhancement for Monitoring of PRRT 177Lu-DOTATATE in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients
title_short Tumor Contrast-Enhancement for Monitoring of PRRT 177Lu-DOTATATE in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients
title_sort tumor contrast enhancement for monitoring of prrt 177lu dotatate in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients
topic therapy monitoring
neuroendocrine tumor
computed tomography
contrast-enhancement
NET
CT
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00193/full
work_keys_str_mv AT olofpettersson tumorcontrastenhancementformonitoringofprrt177ludotatateinpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorpatients
AT katarzynafrossbaron tumorcontrastenhancementformonitoringofprrt177ludotatateinpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorpatients
AT joakimcrona tumorcontrastenhancementformonitoringofprrt177ludotatateinpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorpatients
AT anderssundin tumorcontrastenhancementformonitoringofprrt177ludotatateinpancreaticneuroendocrinetumorpatients