The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information
Abstract Interceptive eavesdropping on the alarm calls of heterospecifics provides crucial information about predators. Previous research suggests predator discrimination, call relevance, reliability, and reception explain when eavesdropping will evolve. However, there has been no quantitative analy...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2023-07-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10272 |
_version_ | 1797357877925511168 |
---|---|
author | Cameron Rouse Turner Matt Spike Robert D. Magrath |
author_facet | Cameron Rouse Turner Matt Spike Robert D. Magrath |
author_sort | Cameron Rouse Turner |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Interceptive eavesdropping on the alarm calls of heterospecifics provides crucial information about predators. Previous research suggests predator discrimination, call relevance, reliability, and reception explain when eavesdropping will evolve. However, there has been no quantitative analysis to scrutinize these principles, or how they interact. We develop a mathematical framework that formalizes the study of the key principles thought to select for eavesdropping. Interceptive eavesdropping appears to be greatly affected by the threat faced by caller and eavesdropper, as well as presence of informational noise affecting the detection of calls and predators. Accordingly, our model uses signal detection theory to examine when selection will favor alarm calling by a sender species and fleeing by an eavesdropping receiver species. We find eavesdropping is most strongly selected when (1) the receiver faces substantial threats, (2) species are ecologically similar, (3) senders often correctly discriminate threats, (4) receivers often correctly perceive calls, and (5) the receiver's personal discrimination of threats is poor. Furthermore, we find (6) that very high predation levels can select against eavesdropping because prey cannot continuously flee and must conserve energy. Reliability of heterospecific calls for identifying threats is thought to be important in selecting for eavesdropping. Consequently, we formally define reliability, showing its connection to specificity and sensitivity, clarifying how these quantities can be measured. We find that high call relevance, due to similar vulnerability to predators between species, strongly favors eavesdropping. This is because senders trade‐off false alarms and missed predator detections in a way that is also favorable for the eavesdropper, by producing less of the costlier error. Unexpectedly, highly relevant calls increase the total number of combined errors and so have lower reliability. Expectedly, when noise greatly affects personally gathered cues to threats, but not heterospecific calls or detection of predators, eavesdropping is favored. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T14:51:47Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e36702a32a2943cbbaf795cdc51beedb |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2045-7758 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T14:51:47Z |
publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Ecology and Evolution |
spelling | doaj.art-e36702a32a2943cbbaf795cdc51beedb2024-01-11T02:50:02ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582023-07-01137n/an/a10.1002/ece3.10272The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal informationCameron Rouse Turner0Matt Spike1Robert D. Magrath2Computational Cognitive Science Lab, Department of Computer Science Princeton University Princeton New Jersey USACentre for Language Evolution, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UKDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory AustraliaAbstract Interceptive eavesdropping on the alarm calls of heterospecifics provides crucial information about predators. Previous research suggests predator discrimination, call relevance, reliability, and reception explain when eavesdropping will evolve. However, there has been no quantitative analysis to scrutinize these principles, or how they interact. We develop a mathematical framework that formalizes the study of the key principles thought to select for eavesdropping. Interceptive eavesdropping appears to be greatly affected by the threat faced by caller and eavesdropper, as well as presence of informational noise affecting the detection of calls and predators. Accordingly, our model uses signal detection theory to examine when selection will favor alarm calling by a sender species and fleeing by an eavesdropping receiver species. We find eavesdropping is most strongly selected when (1) the receiver faces substantial threats, (2) species are ecologically similar, (3) senders often correctly discriminate threats, (4) receivers often correctly perceive calls, and (5) the receiver's personal discrimination of threats is poor. Furthermore, we find (6) that very high predation levels can select against eavesdropping because prey cannot continuously flee and must conserve energy. Reliability of heterospecific calls for identifying threats is thought to be important in selecting for eavesdropping. Consequently, we formally define reliability, showing its connection to specificity and sensitivity, clarifying how these quantities can be measured. We find that high call relevance, due to similar vulnerability to predators between species, strongly favors eavesdropping. This is because senders trade‐off false alarms and missed predator detections in a way that is also favorable for the eavesdropper, by producing less of the costlier error. Unexpectedly, highly relevant calls increase the total number of combined errors and so have lower reliability. Expectedly, when noise greatly affects personally gathered cues to threats, but not heterospecific calls or detection of predators, eavesdropping is favored.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10272alarm calleavesdroppingsignal detection theorysignalingsocial information use |
spellingShingle | Cameron Rouse Turner Matt Spike Robert D. Magrath The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information Ecology and Evolution alarm call eavesdropping signal detection theory signaling social information use |
title | The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information |
title_full | The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information |
title_fullStr | The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information |
title_full_unstemmed | The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information |
title_short | The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information |
title_sort | evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls relevance reliability and personal information |
topic | alarm call eavesdropping signal detection theory signaling social information use |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cameronrouseturner theevolutionofeavesdroppingonheterospecificalarmcallsrelevancereliabilityandpersonalinformation AT mattspike theevolutionofeavesdroppingonheterospecificalarmcallsrelevancereliabilityandpersonalinformation AT robertdmagrath theevolutionofeavesdroppingonheterospecificalarmcallsrelevancereliabilityandpersonalinformation AT cameronrouseturner evolutionofeavesdroppingonheterospecificalarmcallsrelevancereliabilityandpersonalinformation AT mattspike evolutionofeavesdroppingonheterospecificalarmcallsrelevancereliabilityandpersonalinformation AT robertdmagrath evolutionofeavesdroppingonheterospecificalarmcallsrelevancereliabilityandpersonalinformation |