The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information

Abstract Interceptive eavesdropping on the alarm calls of heterospecifics provides crucial information about predators. Previous research suggests predator discrimination, call relevance, reliability, and reception explain when eavesdropping will evolve. However, there has been no quantitative analy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cameron Rouse Turner, Matt Spike, Robert D. Magrath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-07-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10272
_version_ 1797357877925511168
author Cameron Rouse Turner
Matt Spike
Robert D. Magrath
author_facet Cameron Rouse Turner
Matt Spike
Robert D. Magrath
author_sort Cameron Rouse Turner
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Interceptive eavesdropping on the alarm calls of heterospecifics provides crucial information about predators. Previous research suggests predator discrimination, call relevance, reliability, and reception explain when eavesdropping will evolve. However, there has been no quantitative analysis to scrutinize these principles, or how they interact. We develop a mathematical framework that formalizes the study of the key principles thought to select for eavesdropping. Interceptive eavesdropping appears to be greatly affected by the threat faced by caller and eavesdropper, as well as presence of informational noise affecting the detection of calls and predators. Accordingly, our model uses signal detection theory to examine when selection will favor alarm calling by a sender species and fleeing by an eavesdropping receiver species. We find eavesdropping is most strongly selected when (1) the receiver faces substantial threats, (2) species are ecologically similar, (3) senders often correctly discriminate threats, (4) receivers often correctly perceive calls, and (5) the receiver's personal discrimination of threats is poor. Furthermore, we find (6) that very high predation levels can select against eavesdropping because prey cannot continuously flee and must conserve energy. Reliability of heterospecific calls for identifying threats is thought to be important in selecting for eavesdropping. Consequently, we formally define reliability, showing its connection to specificity and sensitivity, clarifying how these quantities can be measured. We find that high call relevance, due to similar vulnerability to predators between species, strongly favors eavesdropping. This is because senders trade‐off false alarms and missed predator detections in a way that is also favorable for the eavesdropper, by producing less of the costlier error. Unexpectedly, highly relevant calls increase the total number of combined errors and so have lower reliability. Expectedly, when noise greatly affects personally gathered cues to threats, but not heterospecific calls or detection of predators, eavesdropping is favored.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T14:51:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e36702a32a2943cbbaf795cdc51beedb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T14:51:47Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-e36702a32a2943cbbaf795cdc51beedb2024-01-11T02:50:02ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582023-07-01137n/an/a10.1002/ece3.10272The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal informationCameron Rouse Turner0Matt Spike1Robert D. Magrath2Computational Cognitive Science Lab, Department of Computer Science Princeton University Princeton New Jersey USACentre for Language Evolution, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UKDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory AustraliaAbstract Interceptive eavesdropping on the alarm calls of heterospecifics provides crucial information about predators. Previous research suggests predator discrimination, call relevance, reliability, and reception explain when eavesdropping will evolve. However, there has been no quantitative analysis to scrutinize these principles, or how they interact. We develop a mathematical framework that formalizes the study of the key principles thought to select for eavesdropping. Interceptive eavesdropping appears to be greatly affected by the threat faced by caller and eavesdropper, as well as presence of informational noise affecting the detection of calls and predators. Accordingly, our model uses signal detection theory to examine when selection will favor alarm calling by a sender species and fleeing by an eavesdropping receiver species. We find eavesdropping is most strongly selected when (1) the receiver faces substantial threats, (2) species are ecologically similar, (3) senders often correctly discriminate threats, (4) receivers often correctly perceive calls, and (5) the receiver's personal discrimination of threats is poor. Furthermore, we find (6) that very high predation levels can select against eavesdropping because prey cannot continuously flee and must conserve energy. Reliability of heterospecific calls for identifying threats is thought to be important in selecting for eavesdropping. Consequently, we formally define reliability, showing its connection to specificity and sensitivity, clarifying how these quantities can be measured. We find that high call relevance, due to similar vulnerability to predators between species, strongly favors eavesdropping. This is because senders trade‐off false alarms and missed predator detections in a way that is also favorable for the eavesdropper, by producing less of the costlier error. Unexpectedly, highly relevant calls increase the total number of combined errors and so have lower reliability. Expectedly, when noise greatly affects personally gathered cues to threats, but not heterospecific calls or detection of predators, eavesdropping is favored.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10272alarm calleavesdroppingsignal detection theorysignalingsocial information use
spellingShingle Cameron Rouse Turner
Matt Spike
Robert D. Magrath
The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information
Ecology and Evolution
alarm call
eavesdropping
signal detection theory
signaling
social information use
title The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information
title_full The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information
title_fullStr The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information
title_short The evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: Relevance, reliability, and personal information
title_sort evolution of eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls relevance reliability and personal information
topic alarm call
eavesdropping
signal detection theory
signaling
social information use
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10272
work_keys_str_mv AT cameronrouseturner theevolutionofeavesdroppingonheterospecificalarmcallsrelevancereliabilityandpersonalinformation
AT mattspike theevolutionofeavesdroppingonheterospecificalarmcallsrelevancereliabilityandpersonalinformation
AT robertdmagrath theevolutionofeavesdroppingonheterospecificalarmcallsrelevancereliabilityandpersonalinformation
AT cameronrouseturner evolutionofeavesdroppingonheterospecificalarmcallsrelevancereliabilityandpersonalinformation
AT mattspike evolutionofeavesdroppingonheterospecificalarmcallsrelevancereliabilityandpersonalinformation
AT robertdmagrath evolutionofeavesdroppingonheterospecificalarmcallsrelevancereliabilityandpersonalinformation