Utilisation of rehabilitation due to mental disorders during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a difference-in-differences analysis

Abstract Background Our analyses examined the extent to which the use of rehabilitation for patients with mental disorders decreased due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Methods We used monthly cross-sectional administrative data on rehabilitation utilisation due to mental disorders in 2019 and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthias Bethge, David Fauser, Pia Zollmann, Marco Streibelt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-03-01
Series:BMC Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04627-w
_version_ 1797863909235884032
author Matthias Bethge
David Fauser
Pia Zollmann
Marco Streibelt
author_facet Matthias Bethge
David Fauser
Pia Zollmann
Marco Streibelt
author_sort Matthias Bethge
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Our analyses examined the extent to which the use of rehabilitation for patients with mental disorders decreased due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Methods We used monthly cross-sectional administrative data on rehabilitation utilisation due to mental disorders in 2019 and 2020 and estimated a difference-in-differences model to determine the reduction in rehabilitation utilisation attributable to the pandemic. Results We included 151,775 rehabilitations in 2019 and 123,229 rehabilitations in 2020 in our analysis. The number of rehabilitations decreased from April to December by 14.2% due to the pandemic (March to December: 21.8%). The decline was more pronounced for women than for men and varied regionally. Temporal and regional differences in utilisation were moderately associated with the decrease in mobility in the pandemic year. In the first phase of the pandemic, i.e., March and April 2020, the decline was strongly associated with the regional incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusion Due to the pandemic, significantly fewer rehabilitations due to mental disorders occurred in Germany in 2020 than in 2019. The likely increasing need for rehabilitation for people with mental disorders should be addressed by making rehabilitation access and delivery more flexible.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:44:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e385229cfad84b198ba18c7a4465143c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-244X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:44:17Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-e385229cfad84b198ba18c7a4465143c2023-03-22T12:01:11ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2023-03-012311710.1186/s12888-023-04627-wUtilisation of rehabilitation due to mental disorders during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a difference-in-differences analysisMatthias Bethge0David Fauser1Pia Zollmann2Marco Streibelt3Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of LübeckInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of LübeckFederal German Pension InsuranceFederal German Pension InsuranceAbstract Background Our analyses examined the extent to which the use of rehabilitation for patients with mental disorders decreased due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Methods We used monthly cross-sectional administrative data on rehabilitation utilisation due to mental disorders in 2019 and 2020 and estimated a difference-in-differences model to determine the reduction in rehabilitation utilisation attributable to the pandemic. Results We included 151,775 rehabilitations in 2019 and 123,229 rehabilitations in 2020 in our analysis. The number of rehabilitations decreased from April to December by 14.2% due to the pandemic (March to December: 21.8%). The decline was more pronounced for women than for men and varied regionally. Temporal and regional differences in utilisation were moderately associated with the decrease in mobility in the pandemic year. In the first phase of the pandemic, i.e., March and April 2020, the decline was strongly associated with the regional incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusion Due to the pandemic, significantly fewer rehabilitations due to mental disorders occurred in Germany in 2020 than in 2019. The likely increasing need for rehabilitation for people with mental disorders should be addressed by making rehabilitation access and delivery more flexible.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04627-wRehabilitationMental health servicesMental disordersSARS-CoV-2
spellingShingle Matthias Bethge
David Fauser
Pia Zollmann
Marco Streibelt
Utilisation of rehabilitation due to mental disorders during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a difference-in-differences analysis
BMC Psychiatry
Rehabilitation
Mental health services
Mental disorders
SARS-CoV-2
title Utilisation of rehabilitation due to mental disorders during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a difference-in-differences analysis
title_full Utilisation of rehabilitation due to mental disorders during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a difference-in-differences analysis
title_fullStr Utilisation of rehabilitation due to mental disorders during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a difference-in-differences analysis
title_full_unstemmed Utilisation of rehabilitation due to mental disorders during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a difference-in-differences analysis
title_short Utilisation of rehabilitation due to mental disorders during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a difference-in-differences analysis
title_sort utilisation of rehabilitation due to mental disorders during the sars cov 2 pandemic a difference in differences analysis
topic Rehabilitation
Mental health services
Mental disorders
SARS-CoV-2
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04627-w
work_keys_str_mv AT matthiasbethge utilisationofrehabilitationduetomentaldisordersduringthesarscov2pandemicadifferenceindifferencesanalysis
AT davidfauser utilisationofrehabilitationduetomentaldisordersduringthesarscov2pandemicadifferenceindifferencesanalysis
AT piazollmann utilisationofrehabilitationduetomentaldisordersduringthesarscov2pandemicadifferenceindifferencesanalysis
AT marcostreibelt utilisationofrehabilitationduetomentaldisordersduringthesarscov2pandemicadifferenceindifferencesanalysis