Genome-wide Association Study (GWAS) and Its Application for Improving the Genomic Estimated Breeding Values (GEBV) of the Berkshire Pork Quality Traits

Genome-wide Association Study (GWAS) and Its Application for Improving the Genomic Estimated Breeding Values (GEBV) of the Berkshire Pork Quality Traits

The missing heritability has been a major problem in the analysis of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). We introduced the traditional genome-wide association study (GWAS) into the BLUP to improve the heritability estimation. We analyzed eight pork quality traits of the Berkshire breeds using GW...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Young-Sup Lee, Hyeonsoo Jeong, Mengistie Taye, Hyeon Jeong Kim, Sojeong Ka, Youn-Chul Ryu, Seoae Cho
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies 2015-11-01
Series:	Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Subjects:	Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Genome Wide Association Study Missing Heritability Problem Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury Lemma Single Nucleotide Polymorphism–Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Berkshire Pigs
Online Access:	http://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/ajas-28-11-1551.pdf

Similar Items

The Usage of an SNP-SNP Relationship Matrix for Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) Analysis Using a Community-Based Cohort Study
by: Young-Sup Lee, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01)

Using genomic selection to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for multi-populations in pigs
by: Chang Yin, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

Estimation and prediction based on k-record values from normal distribution
by: Manoj Chacko, et al.
Published: (2014-10-01)

Comparison of genomic predictions for carcass and reproduction traits in Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire populations in Korea
by: Asif Iqbal, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01)

Evaluation of Genome Based Estimated Breeding Values for Meat Quality in a Berkshire Population Using High Density Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Chips
by: S. Baby, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

Genomic Prediction Accuracy Using Haplotypes Defined by Size and Hierarchical Clustering Based on Linkage Disequilibrium
by: Sohyoung Won, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Corrigendum: Genomic Prediction Accuracy Using Haplotypes Defined by Size and Hierarchical Clustering Based on Linkage Disequilibrium
by: Sohyoung Won, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Short communication: Genomic prediction based on unbiased estimation of the genomic relationship matrix in pigs
by: M.Y. Li, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)

Upper bounds for the Euclidean distances between the BLUPs
by: Markiewicz Augustyn, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

Genomic Prediction of Yield Traits in Single-Cross Hybrid Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
by: Marlee R. Labroo, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Genomic Prediction of Growth Traits in Yorkshire Pigs of Different Reference Group Sizes Using Different Estimated Breeding Value Models
by: Chang Yin, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01)

Genomic Prediction Using Low Density Marker Panels in Aquaculture: Performance Across Species, Traits, and Genotyping Platforms
by: Christina Kriaridou, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Integrating Gene Expression Data into Single-Step Method (ssBLUP) Improves Genomic Prediction Accuracy for Complex Traits of Duroc × Erhualian F<sub>2</sub> Pig Population
by: Fangjun Xu, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)

A comparison of genetic and genomic breeding values in Saanen and Alpine goats
by: A. Negro, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01)

Increased Predictive Accuracy of Multi-Environment Genomic Prediction Model for Yield and Related Traits in Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
by: Vipin Tomar, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)

Performance Comparison of Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction and Four Machine Learning Models for Estimating Genomic Breeding Values in Working Dogs
by: Joseph A. Thorsrud, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)

Comparison of genome-wide association and genomic prediction methods for milk production traits in Korean Holstein cattle
by: SeokHyun Lee, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)

Comparison of different validation methods for single-step genomic evaluations based on a simulated cattle population
by: Judith Himmelbauer, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

Exploring unknown parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction: Insights from a simulated cattle population
by: Judith Himmelbauer, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01)

Impact of genotyping strategy on the accuracy of genomic prediction in simulated populations of purebred swine
by: X. Li, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Single-step genomic evaluation for growth traits in a Mexican Braunvieh cattle population
by: Jonathan Emanuel Valerio-Hernández, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01)

The Prediction of the Expected Current Selection Coefficient of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Associated with Holstein Milk Yield, Fat and Protein Contents
by: Young-Sup Lee, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Single-Step Methodology for Genomic Evaluation in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo)
by: Emhimad E. A. Abdalla, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Associated SNPs, Heritabilities, Trait Correlations, and Genomic Breeding Values for Resistance in Snap Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to Root Rot Caused by Fusarium solani (Mart.) f. sp. phaseoli (Burkholder)
by: Abigail R. Huster, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

A rapid method for computing the inverse of the gametic covariance matrix between relatives for a marked Quantitative Trait Locus
by: Freeman Albert E, et al.
Published: (2001-03-01)

Genomic selection through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction improves the accuracy of evaluation in Hanwoo cattle
by: Mi Na Park, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits in Canadian Alpine and Saanen dairy goats
by: Erin Massender, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Dynamic stress–strength reliability estimation of system with survival signature
by: Yiming Liu, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)

Evaluating the use of statistical and machine learning methods for estimating breed composition of purebred and crossbred animals in thirteen cattle breeds using genomic information
by: C. A. Ryan, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)

Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes
by: Shiva Azizinia, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)

Location Of Objects with a High Degree of Inner Precision
by: Kubáček Lubomír
Published: (2014-03-01)

On Moments of Inverse Kumaraswamy Distribution Based on Progressive Type-II Censored Order Statistics
by: Areej M. AL-Zaydi
Published: (2024-11-01)

On the Lindley Record Values and Associated Inference
by: A. Fallah, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects
by: Matti Taskinen, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)

Application of single-step genomic evaluation using social genetic effect model for growth in pig
by: Joon Ki Hong, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Response of Cowpea (<i>Vigna unguiculata</i> L. Walp) Accessions to Moisture Stress
by: Nyimasata Manneh, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)

Comparison of test-day and lactation models of sire evaluation in Murrah buffalo
by: VIJAY KUMAR, et al.
Published: (2014-09-01)

Bayesian Inference and Prediction for Normal Distribution Based on Records
by: Akbar Asgharzadeh, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)

DATA IMPUTATION IN SWITCHBACK DESIGNS USING A MIXED MODEL WITH CORRELATED ERRORS IMPUTACIÓN DE DATOS EN DISEÑOS SWITCHBACK USANDO UN MODELO MIXTO CON ERRORES CORRELACIONADOS
by: Grajales Luis Fernando, et al.
Published: (2006-11-01)

Partition of the genetic trend to validate multiple selection decisions
by: L.A. García-Cortés, et al.
Published: (2008-01-01)