Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety

Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and hand-sewn IPAA with mucosectomy in cases of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed accordi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Mohammad Iqbal Hussain, Amine Gouader, Bassam Krimi, Alessandro Mazzotta, Adriano Carneira Da Costa, Niccolo Petrucciani, Mehdi Bouassida, Jim Khan, Faouzi Noomen, Hani Oweira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2024-02-01
Series:Cancer Control
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241236338
_version_ 1827340534290579456
author Mohamed Ali Chaouch
Mohammad Iqbal Hussain
Amine Gouader
Bassam Krimi
Alessandro Mazzotta
Adriano Carneira Da Costa
Niccolo Petrucciani
Mehdi Bouassida
Jim Khan
Faouzi Noomen
Hani Oweira
author_facet Mohamed Ali Chaouch
Mohammad Iqbal Hussain
Amine Gouader
Bassam Krimi
Alessandro Mazzotta
Adriano Carneira Da Costa
Niccolo Petrucciani
Mehdi Bouassida
Jim Khan
Faouzi Noomen
Hani Oweira
author_sort Mohamed Ali Chaouch
collection DOAJ
description Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and hand-sewn IPAA with mucosectomy in cases of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines 2020 and AMSTAR 2 (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Subgroup analysis was performed according to the indication for surgery. Results The bibliographic research yielded 31 trials: 3 RCTs, 5 prospective clinical trials, and 24 CCTs including 8872 patients: 4871 patients in the stapled group and 4038 in the hand-sewn group. Regarding postoperative outcomes, the stapled group had a lower rate of anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, and ileal pouch failure. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, anastomotic leak, pelvic sepsis, pouchitis, or hospital stay. For functional outcomes, the stapled group was associated with greater outcomes in terms of seepage per day and by night, pad use, night incontinence, resting pressure, and squeeze pressure. There were no differences in stool Frequency per 24h, stool frequency at night, antidiarrheal medication, sexual impotence, or length of the high-pressure zone. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of dysplasia and neoplasia. Conclusions Compared to hand-sewn anastomosis, stapled ileoanal anastomosis leads to a large reduction in anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, ileal pouch failure, seepage by day and night, pad use, and night incontinence. This may ensure a higher resting pressure and squeeze pressure in manometry evaluation. Protocol Registration The protocol was registered at PROSPERO under CRD 42022379880.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T21:21:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e398e489811d400f8f0247acb51a06d1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1526-2359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T21:21:24Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Cancer Control
spelling doaj.art-e398e489811d400f8f0247acb51a06d12024-02-27T11:03:32ZengSAGE PublishingCancer Control1526-23592024-02-013110.1177/10732748241236338Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological SafetyMohamed Ali ChaouchMohammad Iqbal HussainAmine GouaderBassam KrimiAlessandro MazzottaAdriano Carneira Da CostaNiccolo PetruccianiMehdi BouassidaJim KhanFaouzi NoomenHani OweiraPurpose This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and hand-sewn IPAA with mucosectomy in cases of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines 2020 and AMSTAR 2 (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Subgroup analysis was performed according to the indication for surgery. Results The bibliographic research yielded 31 trials: 3 RCTs, 5 prospective clinical trials, and 24 CCTs including 8872 patients: 4871 patients in the stapled group and 4038 in the hand-sewn group. Regarding postoperative outcomes, the stapled group had a lower rate of anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, and ileal pouch failure. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, anastomotic leak, pelvic sepsis, pouchitis, or hospital stay. For functional outcomes, the stapled group was associated with greater outcomes in terms of seepage per day and by night, pad use, night incontinence, resting pressure, and squeeze pressure. There were no differences in stool Frequency per 24h, stool frequency at night, antidiarrheal medication, sexual impotence, or length of the high-pressure zone. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of dysplasia and neoplasia. Conclusions Compared to hand-sewn anastomosis, stapled ileoanal anastomosis leads to a large reduction in anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, ileal pouch failure, seepage by day and night, pad use, and night incontinence. This may ensure a higher resting pressure and squeeze pressure in manometry evaluation. Protocol Registration The protocol was registered at PROSPERO under CRD 42022379880.https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241236338
spellingShingle Mohamed Ali Chaouch
Mohammad Iqbal Hussain
Amine Gouader
Bassam Krimi
Alessandro Mazzotta
Adriano Carneira Da Costa
Niccolo Petrucciani
Mehdi Bouassida
Jim Khan
Faouzi Noomen
Hani Oweira
Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety
Cancer Control
title Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety
title_full Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety
title_fullStr Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety
title_full_unstemmed Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety
title_short Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety
title_sort stapled anastomosis versus hand sewn anastomosis with mucosectomy for ileal pouch anal anastomosis a systematic review and meta analysis of postoperative outcomes functional outcomes and oncological safety
url https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241236338
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedalichaouch stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety
AT mohammadiqbalhussain stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety
AT aminegouader stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety
AT bassamkrimi stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety
AT alessandromazzotta stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety
AT adrianocarneiradacosta stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety
AT niccolopetrucciani stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety
AT mehdibouassida stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety
AT jimkhan stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety
AT faouzinoomen stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety
AT hanioweira stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety