Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety
Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and hand-sewn IPAA with mucosectomy in cases of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed accordi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2024-02-01
|
| Series: | Cancer Control |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241236338 |
| _version_ | 1827340534290579456 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohamed Ali Chaouch Mohammad Iqbal Hussain Amine Gouader Bassam Krimi Alessandro Mazzotta Adriano Carneira Da Costa Niccolo Petrucciani Mehdi Bouassida Jim Khan Faouzi Noomen Hani Oweira |
| author_facet | Mohamed Ali Chaouch Mohammad Iqbal Hussain Amine Gouader Bassam Krimi Alessandro Mazzotta Adriano Carneira Da Costa Niccolo Petrucciani Mehdi Bouassida Jim Khan Faouzi Noomen Hani Oweira |
| author_sort | Mohamed Ali Chaouch |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and hand-sewn IPAA with mucosectomy in cases of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines 2020 and AMSTAR 2 (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Subgroup analysis was performed according to the indication for surgery. Results The bibliographic research yielded 31 trials: 3 RCTs, 5 prospective clinical trials, and 24 CCTs including 8872 patients: 4871 patients in the stapled group and 4038 in the hand-sewn group. Regarding postoperative outcomes, the stapled group had a lower rate of anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, and ileal pouch failure. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, anastomotic leak, pelvic sepsis, pouchitis, or hospital stay. For functional outcomes, the stapled group was associated with greater outcomes in terms of seepage per day and by night, pad use, night incontinence, resting pressure, and squeeze pressure. There were no differences in stool Frequency per 24h, stool frequency at night, antidiarrheal medication, sexual impotence, or length of the high-pressure zone. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of dysplasia and neoplasia. Conclusions Compared to hand-sewn anastomosis, stapled ileoanal anastomosis leads to a large reduction in anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, ileal pouch failure, seepage by day and night, pad use, and night incontinence. This may ensure a higher resting pressure and squeeze pressure in manometry evaluation. Protocol Registration The protocol was registered at PROSPERO under CRD 42022379880. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T21:21:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e398e489811d400f8f0247acb51a06d1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1526-2359 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T21:21:24Z |
| publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cancer Control |
| spelling | doaj.art-e398e489811d400f8f0247acb51a06d12024-02-27T11:03:32ZengSAGE PublishingCancer Control1526-23592024-02-013110.1177/10732748241236338Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological SafetyMohamed Ali ChaouchMohammad Iqbal HussainAmine GouaderBassam KrimiAlessandro MazzottaAdriano Carneira Da CostaNiccolo PetruccianiMehdi BouassidaJim KhanFaouzi NoomenHani OweiraPurpose This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and hand-sewn IPAA with mucosectomy in cases of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines 2020 and AMSTAR 2 (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Subgroup analysis was performed according to the indication for surgery. Results The bibliographic research yielded 31 trials: 3 RCTs, 5 prospective clinical trials, and 24 CCTs including 8872 patients: 4871 patients in the stapled group and 4038 in the hand-sewn group. Regarding postoperative outcomes, the stapled group had a lower rate of anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, and ileal pouch failure. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, anastomotic leak, pelvic sepsis, pouchitis, or hospital stay. For functional outcomes, the stapled group was associated with greater outcomes in terms of seepage per day and by night, pad use, night incontinence, resting pressure, and squeeze pressure. There were no differences in stool Frequency per 24h, stool frequency at night, antidiarrheal medication, sexual impotence, or length of the high-pressure zone. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of dysplasia and neoplasia. Conclusions Compared to hand-sewn anastomosis, stapled ileoanal anastomosis leads to a large reduction in anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, ileal pouch failure, seepage by day and night, pad use, and night incontinence. This may ensure a higher resting pressure and squeeze pressure in manometry evaluation. Protocol Registration The protocol was registered at PROSPERO under CRD 42022379880.https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241236338 |
| spellingShingle | Mohamed Ali Chaouch Mohammad Iqbal Hussain Amine Gouader Bassam Krimi Alessandro Mazzotta Adriano Carneira Da Costa Niccolo Petrucciani Mehdi Bouassida Jim Khan Faouzi Noomen Hani Oweira Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety Cancer Control |
| title | Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety |
| title_full | Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety |
| title_fullStr | Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety |
| title_full_unstemmed | Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety |
| title_short | Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety |
| title_sort | stapled anastomosis versus hand sewn anastomosis with mucosectomy for ileal pouch anal anastomosis a systematic review and meta analysis of postoperative outcomes functional outcomes and oncological safety |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241236338 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mohamedalichaouch stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety AT mohammadiqbalhussain stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety AT aminegouader stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety AT bassamkrimi stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety AT alessandromazzotta stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety AT adrianocarneiradacosta stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety AT niccolopetrucciani stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety AT mehdibouassida stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety AT jimkhan stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety AT faouzinoomen stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety AT hanioweira stapledanastomosisversushandsewnanastomosiswithmucosectomyforilealpouchanalanastomosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpostoperativeoutcomesfunctionaloutcomesandoncologicalsafety |