Commenting the article by P.Y. Kantor: сounter-arguments
The article presents objections to the arguments set out in article «Revisiting an issue of mandatory assignment of complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination of legal capability: pro arguments» by P.Yu. Kantor in favor of legislative recognition of mandatory complex forensic psychol...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
2016-03-01
|
| Series: | Психология и право |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyandlaw/2016/n1/80687.shtml |
| _version_ | 1818516143010217984 |
|---|---|
| author | Safuanov F.S. Shishkov S.N. |
| author_facet | Safuanov F.S. Shishkov S.N. |
| author_sort | Safuanov F.S. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article presents objections to the arguments set out in article «Revisiting an issue of mandatory assignment of complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination of legal capability: pro arguments» by P.Yu. Kantor in favor of legislative recognition of mandatory complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination of legal capability in the case of adjudge a citizen incapable due to mental disorder. From the point of view of the theory and methodology of complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination, the authors inappropriately constrict competence limits of forensic psychiatrists and ignore the possibility and the need to integrate medical and psychological knowledge in forensics. P. Yu. Kantor’s theses about the total dominance of psychiatric examinations in civil proceedings and a painful and humiliating for subject forensic psychiatric examination in Russia are objectionable. The present paper shows negative organizational and legal consequences of this legal norm and proposes a wide interdisciplinary discussion on the problem. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T00:38:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e3a4a202392443a2938d09f372d42cad |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2222-5196 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T00:38:11Z |
| publishDate | 2016-03-01 |
| publisher | Moscow State University of Psychology and Education |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Психология и право |
| spelling | doaj.art-e3a4a202392443a2938d09f372d42cad2022-12-22T01:27:02ZrusMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationПсихология и право2222-51962016-03-016191710.17759/psylaw.2016060102Commenting the article by P.Y. Kantor: сounter-argumentsSafuanov F.S.0Shishkov S.N.1V.P. Serbsky Federal Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Addiction, Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation V.P. Serbsky Federal Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Addiction, Ministry of Health Care of the Russian FederationThe article presents objections to the arguments set out in article «Revisiting an issue of mandatory assignment of complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination of legal capability: pro arguments» by P.Yu. Kantor in favor of legislative recognition of mandatory complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination of legal capability in the case of adjudge a citizen incapable due to mental disorder. From the point of view of the theory and methodology of complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination, the authors inappropriately constrict competence limits of forensic psychiatrists and ignore the possibility and the need to integrate medical and psychological knowledge in forensics. P. Yu. Kantor’s theses about the total dominance of psychiatric examinations in civil proceedings and a painful and humiliating for subject forensic psychiatric examination in Russia are objectionable. The present paper shows negative organizational and legal consequences of this legal norm and proposes a wide interdisciplinary discussion on the problem.http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyandlaw/2016/n1/80687.shtmllimited dispositive legal capacitylegal incapacitationcomplex forensic psychological and psychiatric examinationforensic psychiatric examination in litigation proceedingsmandatory legal enquiry. |
| spellingShingle | Safuanov F.S. Shishkov S.N. Commenting the article by P.Y. Kantor: сounter-arguments Психология и право limited dispositive legal capacity legal incapacitation complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination forensic psychiatric examination in litigation proceedings mandatory legal enquiry. |
| title | Commenting the article by P.Y. Kantor: сounter-arguments |
| title_full | Commenting the article by P.Y. Kantor: сounter-arguments |
| title_fullStr | Commenting the article by P.Y. Kantor: сounter-arguments |
| title_full_unstemmed | Commenting the article by P.Y. Kantor: сounter-arguments |
| title_short | Commenting the article by P.Y. Kantor: сounter-arguments |
| title_sort | commenting the article by p y kantor сounter arguments |
| topic | limited dispositive legal capacity legal incapacitation complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination forensic psychiatric examination in litigation proceedings mandatory legal enquiry. |
| url | http://psyjournals.ru/en/psyandlaw/2016/n1/80687.shtml |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT safuanovfs commentingthearticlebypykantorsounterarguments AT shishkovsn commentingthearticlebypykantorsounterarguments |