Philological Remarks on Two Genealogies of the Crimean-Tatar Clan Shirin
Objectives: Philological analysis of two genealogies of the Crimean-Tatar clan termed the Shirin, and an identification of a possible common source of these genealogies. Research materials: Two genealogies (family-trees) of the most prominent clan of the Crimean Khanate, the Shirin, have survived....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of History
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Золотоордынское обозрение |
Online Access: | http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2017-4-8/ |
_version_ | 1826907678069227520 |
---|---|
author | Göncöl Cs. |
author_facet | Göncöl Cs. |
author_sort | Göncöl Cs. |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objectives: Philological analysis of two genealogies of the Crimean-Tatar clan termed the Shirin, and an identification of a possible common source of these genealogies.
Research materials: Two genealogies (family-trees) of the most prominent clan of the Crimean Khanate, the Shirin, have survived. The earlier one was preserved in the chronicle of the ʿUmdetü l aḫbār ‘Essence of Histories’ (1748), written by ʿAbdu l Ġaffār Qırımī, a historian of the Crimean Khanate and judge on Shirin estates. The later one was presented by clan-members after 1807 to the Crimean Assembly of Nobility (Таврическое дворянское собрание) for the recognition of their noble status and estates. This version was translated into Russian and published by Lashkov. Therefore, the question arises: can the two genealogies have a common source?
Results and the novelty of the research: Through a philological comparison of the material, the aim of the author was to demonstrate that the genealogies of the Shirin clan show similarities in content, structure, and text. The author supposes that the texts of ʿAbdu l Ġaffār Qırımī and the genealogy preserved in Russian translation could have been compiled from the same source, perhaps a preliminary Shirin genealogy which, judging from its content, the author dates to the 1660s. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T18:22:32Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e3a77eb6d9414ef6af698715810caf3f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2308-152X 2313-6197 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2025-02-17T09:09:47Z |
publishDate | 2017-12-01 |
publisher | Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of History |
record_format | Article |
series | Золотоордынское обозрение |
spelling | doaj.art-e3a77eb6d9414ef6af698715810caf3f2025-01-02T15:49:17ZengTatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of HistoryЗолотоордынское обозрение2308-152X2313-61972017-12-0154811824http://dx.doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2017-5-4.811-824Philological Remarks on Two Genealogies of the Crimean-Tatar Clan ShirinGöncöl Cs.0Turkological Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and University of Szeged Szeged, Hungary csaba986@gmail.comObjectives: Philological analysis of two genealogies of the Crimean-Tatar clan termed the Shirin, and an identification of a possible common source of these genealogies. Research materials: Two genealogies (family-trees) of the most prominent clan of the Crimean Khanate, the Shirin, have survived. The earlier one was preserved in the chronicle of the ʿUmdetü l aḫbār ‘Essence of Histories’ (1748), written by ʿAbdu l Ġaffār Qırımī, a historian of the Crimean Khanate and judge on Shirin estates. The later one was presented by clan-members after 1807 to the Crimean Assembly of Nobility (Таврическое дворянское собрание) for the recognition of their noble status and estates. This version was translated into Russian and published by Lashkov. Therefore, the question arises: can the two genealogies have a common source? Results and the novelty of the research: Through a philological comparison of the material, the aim of the author was to demonstrate that the genealogies of the Shirin clan show similarities in content, structure, and text. The author supposes that the texts of ʿAbdu l Ġaffār Qırımī and the genealogy preserved in Russian translation could have been compiled from the same source, perhaps a preliminary Shirin genealogy which, judging from its content, the author dates to the 1660s.http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2017-4-8/ |
spellingShingle | Göncöl Cs. Philological Remarks on Two Genealogies of the Crimean-Tatar Clan Shirin Золотоордынское обозрение |
title | Philological Remarks on Two Genealogies of the Crimean-Tatar Clan Shirin |
title_full | Philological Remarks on Two Genealogies of the Crimean-Tatar Clan Shirin |
title_fullStr | Philological Remarks on Two Genealogies of the Crimean-Tatar Clan Shirin |
title_full_unstemmed | Philological Remarks on Two Genealogies of the Crimean-Tatar Clan Shirin |
title_short | Philological Remarks on Two Genealogies of the Crimean-Tatar Clan Shirin |
title_sort | philological remarks on two genealogies of the crimean tatar clan shirin |
url | http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2017-4-8/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goncolcs philologicalremarksontwogenealogiesofthecrimeantatarclanshirin |