An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal Code
The Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution and the guardian of human rights has the duty to ensure that the Law does not contradict the constitution and does not violate human rights. One of the manifestations of this can be seen in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnal-umbuton.ac.id/index.php/Volkgeist/article/view/678 |
| _version_ | 1818484772753637376 |
|---|---|
| author | Xavier Nugraha Kusuma Wardani Raharjo Ahmad Ardhiansyah Alip Pamungkas Raharjo |
| author_facet | Xavier Nugraha Kusuma Wardani Raharjo Ahmad Ardhiansyah Alip Pamungkas Raharjo |
| author_sort | Xavier Nugraha |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution and the guardian of human rights has the duty to ensure that the Law does not contradict the constitution and does not violate human rights. One of the manifestations of this can be seen in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013, where the Constitutional Court removed the element "Some other deeds or unpleasant treatment/act" in Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. With the removal of the core elements of Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, raises questions related to the existence of the offense whether it still exists or not. Based on this, this study will examine 1) Application of Article 335 of the Criminal Code Before the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013 and 2.) Application of Article 335 of the Criminal Code After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013. This research is a normative legal research with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. Based on this research, it was found that after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013 that offenses of unpleasant acts had been reconstructed into forced offenses.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T15:59:23Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e3b1c8f2a2f344548a177d7a8f33afc0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2528-360X 2621-6159 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T15:59:23Z |
| publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
| publisher | Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist |
| spelling | doaj.art-e3b1c8f2a2f344548a177d7a8f33afc02022-12-22T01:42:29ZengFakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah ButonJurnal Hukum Volkgeist2528-360X2621-61592021-06-015210.35326/volkgeist.v5i2.678An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal CodeXavier Nugraha0Kusuma Wardani Raharjo1Ahmad Ardhiansyah2Alip Pamungkas Raharjo3Airlangga UniversityUniversitas AirlanggaUniversitas AirlanggaUniversitas Airlangga The Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution and the guardian of human rights has the duty to ensure that the Law does not contradict the constitution and does not violate human rights. One of the manifestations of this can be seen in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013, where the Constitutional Court removed the element "Some other deeds or unpleasant treatment/act" in Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. With the removal of the core elements of Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, raises questions related to the existence of the offense whether it still exists or not. Based on this, this study will examine 1) Application of Article 335 of the Criminal Code Before the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013 and 2.) Application of Article 335 of the Criminal Code After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013. This research is a normative legal research with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. Based on this research, it was found that after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013 that offenses of unpleasant acts had been reconstructed into forced offenses. https://jurnal-umbuton.ac.id/index.php/Volkgeist/article/view/678Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal CodeDecision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013,Unpleasant Acts |
| spellingShingle | Xavier Nugraha Kusuma Wardani Raharjo Ahmad Ardhiansyah Alip Pamungkas Raharjo An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal Code Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013, Unpleasant Acts |
| title | An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal Code |
| title_full | An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal Code |
| title_fullStr | An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal Code |
| title_full_unstemmed | An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal Code |
| title_short | An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal Code |
| title_sort | analysis of the offense of unpleasant action in article 335 paragraph 1 of the indonesian criminal code |
| topic | Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013, Unpleasant Acts |
| url | https://jurnal-umbuton.ac.id/index.php/Volkgeist/article/view/678 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xaviernugraha ananalysisoftheoffenseofunpleasantactioninarticle335paragraph1oftheindonesiancriminalcode AT kusumawardaniraharjo ananalysisoftheoffenseofunpleasantactioninarticle335paragraph1oftheindonesiancriminalcode AT ahmadardhiansyah ananalysisoftheoffenseofunpleasantactioninarticle335paragraph1oftheindonesiancriminalcode AT alippamungkasraharjo ananalysisoftheoffenseofunpleasantactioninarticle335paragraph1oftheindonesiancriminalcode AT xaviernugraha analysisoftheoffenseofunpleasantactioninarticle335paragraph1oftheindonesiancriminalcode AT kusumawardaniraharjo analysisoftheoffenseofunpleasantactioninarticle335paragraph1oftheindonesiancriminalcode AT ahmadardhiansyah analysisoftheoffenseofunpleasantactioninarticle335paragraph1oftheindonesiancriminalcode AT alippamungkasraharjo analysisoftheoffenseofunpleasantactioninarticle335paragraph1oftheindonesiancriminalcode |