The dynamics of capitalism and the return of classes

The growing social inequality and the abandonment of the welfare-state model raise the question of the return of classes to the historical arena. The author argues that the contemporary society can be characterized as capitalist due to its main structural element - a pattern of striving for profit;...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: R. I. Anisimov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2022-12-01
Series:RUDN journal of Sociology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/viewFile/33221/21603
_version_ 1828068216280186880
author R. I. Anisimov
author_facet R. I. Anisimov
author_sort R. I. Anisimov
collection DOAJ
description The growing social inequality and the abandonment of the welfare-state model raise the question of the return of classes to the historical arena. The author argues that the contemporary society can be characterized as capitalist due to its main structural element - a pattern of striving for profit; at the same time, the contemporary capitalist society has changed the vector of making profit from external expansion (search for new markets and centers of production) to internal intensity (automatization, increased exploitation, total commodification, removal of institutional barriers to profit). Today, capitalism has exhausted the possibilities of external expansion and is changing its strategy to the restructuring of social systems and its actors, which is accompanied by the abandonment of the welfare-state model and by the growing instability in labor relations. This leads to the situation in which middle classes disappear and social inequality grows. The concept of classes developed by K. Marx has regained its importance, since the theories created in the middle of the 20th century no longer correspond to the contemporary realities. The article revises the Marxist class model, in particular the author argues that the type of ownership is no longer a key differentiating criterion, and capitalists and proletarians are no longer the main classes of the contemporary society. The classes of employers and precariat are more relevant for describing the contemporary society. The ideas of these two classes also differ: the precariat strives to preserve social guarantees and labor rights; while employers, on the contrary, strive to maximize profits by reducing social guarantees and violating labor rights.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T23:58:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e3b1c926d70c41429505d60490dfc55b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2313-2272
2408-8897
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T23:58:19Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
record_format Article
series RUDN journal of Sociology
spelling doaj.art-e3b1c926d70c41429505d60490dfc55b2023-01-10T09:58:11ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN journal of Sociology2313-22722408-88972022-12-0122493794810.22363/2313-2272-2022-22-4-937-94821086The dynamics of capitalism and the return of classesR. I. Anisimov0Russian State University for HumanitiesThe growing social inequality and the abandonment of the welfare-state model raise the question of the return of classes to the historical arena. The author argues that the contemporary society can be characterized as capitalist due to its main structural element - a pattern of striving for profit; at the same time, the contemporary capitalist society has changed the vector of making profit from external expansion (search for new markets and centers of production) to internal intensity (automatization, increased exploitation, total commodification, removal of institutional barriers to profit). Today, capitalism has exhausted the possibilities of external expansion and is changing its strategy to the restructuring of social systems and its actors, which is accompanied by the abandonment of the welfare-state model and by the growing instability in labor relations. This leads to the situation in which middle classes disappear and social inequality grows. The concept of classes developed by K. Marx has regained its importance, since the theories created in the middle of the 20th century no longer correspond to the contemporary realities. The article revises the Marxist class model, in particular the author argues that the type of ownership is no longer a key differentiating criterion, and capitalists and proletarians are no longer the main classes of the contemporary society. The classes of employers and precariat are more relevant for describing the contemporary society. The ideas of these two classes also differ: the precariat strives to preserve social guarantees and labor rights; while employers, on the contrary, strive to maximize profits by reducing social guarantees and violating labor rights.https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/viewFile/33221/21603capitalismk. marxexternal expansioninternal expansion of capitalismabandonment of welfare statepovertyinequalityproletariatprecariat
spellingShingle R. I. Anisimov
The dynamics of capitalism and the return of classes
RUDN journal of Sociology
capitalism
k. marx
external expansion
internal expansion of capitalism
abandonment of welfare state
poverty
inequality
proletariat
precariat
title The dynamics of capitalism and the return of classes
title_full The dynamics of capitalism and the return of classes
title_fullStr The dynamics of capitalism and the return of classes
title_full_unstemmed The dynamics of capitalism and the return of classes
title_short The dynamics of capitalism and the return of classes
title_sort dynamics of capitalism and the return of classes
topic capitalism
k. marx
external expansion
internal expansion of capitalism
abandonment of welfare state
poverty
inequality
proletariat
precariat
url https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/viewFile/33221/21603
work_keys_str_mv AT rianisimov thedynamicsofcapitalismandthereturnofclasses
AT rianisimov dynamicsofcapitalismandthereturnofclasses