Infection control measures in nosocomial MRSA outbreaks-Results of a systematic analysis.

There is a lack of data on factors that contribute to the implementation of hygiene measures during nosocomial outbreaks (NO) caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Therefore, we first conducted a systematic literature analysis to identify MRSA outbreak reports. The expenditur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Béke Pannewick, Claas Baier, Frank Schwab, Ralf-Peter Vonberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249837&type=printable
_version_ 1826554458113310720
author Béke Pannewick
Claas Baier
Frank Schwab
Ralf-Peter Vonberg
author_facet Béke Pannewick
Claas Baier
Frank Schwab
Ralf-Peter Vonberg
author_sort Béke Pannewick
collection DOAJ
description There is a lack of data on factors that contribute to the implementation of hygiene measures during nosocomial outbreaks (NO) caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Therefore, we first conducted a systematic literature analysis to identify MRSA outbreak reports. The expenditure for infection control in each outbreak was then evaluated by a weighted cumulative hygiene score (WCHS). Effects of factors on this score were determined by multivariable linear regression analysis. 104 NO got included, mostly from neonatology (n = 32), surgery (n = 27), internal medicine and burn units (n = 10 each), including 4,361 patients (thereof 657 infections and 73 deaths) and 279 employees. The outbreak sources remained unknown in 10 NO and were not reported from further 61 NO. The national MRSA prevalence did not correlate with the WCHS (p = .714). There were significant WCHS differences for internal medicine (p = 0.014), burn units (p<0.01), for Japanese NO (p<0.01), and NO with an unknown source (p<0.01). In sum, management of a NO due to MRSA does not depend on the local MRSA burden. However, differences of MRSA management among medical departments do exist. Strict adherence to the Outbreak Reports and Intervention Studies Of Nosocomial infection (ORION) statement is highly recommended for. The WCHS may also serve as a useful tool to quantify infection control effort and could therefore be used for further investigations.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T01:42:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e3b36cd1448d4c9191c7e36cc86778ce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-14T07:41:14Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-e3b36cd1448d4c9191c7e36cc86778ce2025-03-03T05:35:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01164e024983710.1371/journal.pone.0249837Infection control measures in nosocomial MRSA outbreaks-Results of a systematic analysis.Béke PannewickClaas BaierFrank SchwabRalf-Peter VonbergThere is a lack of data on factors that contribute to the implementation of hygiene measures during nosocomial outbreaks (NO) caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Therefore, we first conducted a systematic literature analysis to identify MRSA outbreak reports. The expenditure for infection control in each outbreak was then evaluated by a weighted cumulative hygiene score (WCHS). Effects of factors on this score were determined by multivariable linear regression analysis. 104 NO got included, mostly from neonatology (n = 32), surgery (n = 27), internal medicine and burn units (n = 10 each), including 4,361 patients (thereof 657 infections and 73 deaths) and 279 employees. The outbreak sources remained unknown in 10 NO and were not reported from further 61 NO. The national MRSA prevalence did not correlate with the WCHS (p = .714). There were significant WCHS differences for internal medicine (p = 0.014), burn units (p<0.01), for Japanese NO (p<0.01), and NO with an unknown source (p<0.01). In sum, management of a NO due to MRSA does not depend on the local MRSA burden. However, differences of MRSA management among medical departments do exist. Strict adherence to the Outbreak Reports and Intervention Studies Of Nosocomial infection (ORION) statement is highly recommended for. The WCHS may also serve as a useful tool to quantify infection control effort and could therefore be used for further investigations.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249837&type=printable
spellingShingle Béke Pannewick
Claas Baier
Frank Schwab
Ralf-Peter Vonberg
Infection control measures in nosocomial MRSA outbreaks-Results of a systematic analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Infection control measures in nosocomial MRSA outbreaks-Results of a systematic analysis.
title_full Infection control measures in nosocomial MRSA outbreaks-Results of a systematic analysis.
title_fullStr Infection control measures in nosocomial MRSA outbreaks-Results of a systematic analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Infection control measures in nosocomial MRSA outbreaks-Results of a systematic analysis.
title_short Infection control measures in nosocomial MRSA outbreaks-Results of a systematic analysis.
title_sort infection control measures in nosocomial mrsa outbreaks results of a systematic analysis
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249837&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT bekepannewick infectioncontrolmeasuresinnosocomialmrsaoutbreaksresultsofasystematicanalysis
AT claasbaier infectioncontrolmeasuresinnosocomialmrsaoutbreaksresultsofasystematicanalysis
AT frankschwab infectioncontrolmeasuresinnosocomialmrsaoutbreaksresultsofasystematicanalysis
AT ralfpetervonberg infectioncontrolmeasuresinnosocomialmrsaoutbreaksresultsofasystematicanalysis