Semantic cross-scale numerical anchoring

Anchoring effects are robust, varied and can be consequential. Researchers have provided a variety of alternative explanations for these effects. More recently, it has become apparent that anchoring effects might be produced by a variety of different processes, either acting simultaneously, or else...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam J. L. Harris, Maarten Speekenbrink
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2016-11-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/16/16609/jdm16609.pdf
_version_ 1827887526469173248
author Adam J. L. Harris
Maarten Speekenbrink
author_facet Adam J. L. Harris
Maarten Speekenbrink
author_sort Adam J. L. Harris
collection DOAJ
description Anchoring effects are robust, varied and can be consequential. Researchers have provided a variety of alternative explanations for these effects. More recently, it has become apparent that anchoring effects might be produced by a variety of different processes, either acting simultaneously, or else individually in distinct situations. An unresolved issue is whether anchoring, aside from simple numeric priming, can transcend scales. That is, is it necessary that the anchor value and the target judgment are expressed in the same units? Despite some theoretical predictions to the contrary, this paper demonstrates semantic cross-scale anchoring in four experiments. Such effects are important for the direction of future theorising on the causes of anchoring effects and understanding the scope of their consequences in applied domains.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:19:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e3b891a4f87d4d21ae83514b1b4ef577
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:19:53Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-e3b891a4f87d4d21ae83514b1b4ef5772023-08-02T01:03:01ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752016-11-01116572581Semantic cross-scale numerical anchoringAdam J. L. HarrisMaarten SpeekenbrinkAnchoring effects are robust, varied and can be consequential. Researchers have provided a variety of alternative explanations for these effects. More recently, it has become apparent that anchoring effects might be produced by a variety of different processes, either acting simultaneously, or else individually in distinct situations. An unresolved issue is whether anchoring, aside from simple numeric priming, can transcend scales. That is, is it necessary that the anchor value and the target judgment are expressed in the same units? Despite some theoretical predictions to the contrary, this paper demonstrates semantic cross-scale anchoring in four experiments. Such effects are important for the direction of future theorising on the causes of anchoring effects and understanding the scope of their consequences in applied domains.http://journal.sjdm.org/16/16609/jdm16609.pdfanchoring heuristics scale distortion selective accessibility anchoring-and-adjustment bias.NAKeywords
spellingShingle Adam J. L. Harris
Maarten Speekenbrink
Semantic cross-scale numerical anchoring
Judgment and Decision Making
anchoring
heuristics
scale distortion
selective accessibility
anchoring-and-adjustment
bias.NAKeywords
title Semantic cross-scale numerical anchoring
title_full Semantic cross-scale numerical anchoring
title_fullStr Semantic cross-scale numerical anchoring
title_full_unstemmed Semantic cross-scale numerical anchoring
title_short Semantic cross-scale numerical anchoring
title_sort semantic cross scale numerical anchoring
topic anchoring
heuristics
scale distortion
selective accessibility
anchoring-and-adjustment
bias.NAKeywords
url http://journal.sjdm.org/16/16609/jdm16609.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT adamjlharris semanticcrossscalenumericalanchoring
AT maartenspeekenbrink semanticcrossscalenumericalanchoring