Comparison of Global and Regional Compliance-Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration on Regional Lung Ventilation in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
PurposeTo investigate the difference in the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selected with chest electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and with global dynamic respiratory system compliance (Crs) in moderate-to-severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (pARDS).MethodsPatients with m...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.805680/full |
_version_ | 1811251008977764352 |
---|---|
author | Hong Ren Li Xie Zhulin Wang Xiaoliao Tang Botao Ning Teng Teng Juan Qian Ying Wang Lijun Fu Zhanqi Zhao Zhanqi Zhao Long Xiang Long Xiang |
author_facet | Hong Ren Li Xie Zhulin Wang Xiaoliao Tang Botao Ning Teng Teng Juan Qian Ying Wang Lijun Fu Zhanqi Zhao Zhanqi Zhao Long Xiang Long Xiang |
author_sort | Hong Ren |
collection | DOAJ |
description | PurposeTo investigate the difference in the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selected with chest electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and with global dynamic respiratory system compliance (Crs) in moderate-to-severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (pARDS).MethodsPatients with moderate-to-severe pARDS (PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg) were retrospectively included. On the day of pARDS diagnosis, two PEEP levels were determined during the decremental PEEP titration for each individual using the best compliance (PEEPC) and EIT-based regional compliance (PEEPEIT) methods. The differences of global and regional compliance (for both gravity-dependent and non-dependent regions) under the two PEEP conditions were compared. In addition, the EIT-based global inhomogeneity index (GI), the center of ventilation (CoV), and standard deviation of regional delayed ventilation (RVDSD) were also calculated and compared.ResultsA total of 12 children with pARDS (5 with severe and 7 with moderate pARDS) were included. PEEPC and PEEPEIT were identical in 6 patients. In others, the differences were only ± 2 cm H2O (one PEEP step). There were no statistical differences in global compliance at PEEPC and PEEPEIT [28.7 (2.84–33.15) vs. 29.74 (2.84–33.47) ml/cm H2O median (IQR), p = 0.028 (the significant level after adjusted for multiple comparison was 0.017)]. Furthermore, no differences were found in regional compliances and other EIT-based parameters measuring spatial and temporal ventilation distributions.ConclusionAlthough EIT provided information on ventilation distribution, PEEP selected with the best Crs might be non-inferior to EIT-guided regional ventilation in moderate-to-severe pARDS. Further study with a large sample size is required to confirm the finding. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T16:13:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e3c0ad98a40d4d86bef989e4f989a66f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2296-858X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T16:13:12Z |
publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-e3c0ad98a40d4d86bef989e4f989a66f2022-12-22T03:25:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2022-05-01910.3389/fmed.2022.805680805680Comparison of Global and Regional Compliance-Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration on Regional Lung Ventilation in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeHong Ren0Li Xie1Zhulin Wang2Xiaoliao Tang3Botao Ning4Teng Teng5Juan Qian6Ying Wang7Lijun Fu8Zhanqi Zhao9Zhanqi Zhao10Long Xiang11Long Xiang12Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaClinical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, ChinaInstitute of Technical Medicine, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, GermanyDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Neonatal, Second People’s Hospital of Kashgar, Xinjiang, ChinaPurposeTo investigate the difference in the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selected with chest electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and with global dynamic respiratory system compliance (Crs) in moderate-to-severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (pARDS).MethodsPatients with moderate-to-severe pARDS (PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg) were retrospectively included. On the day of pARDS diagnosis, two PEEP levels were determined during the decremental PEEP titration for each individual using the best compliance (PEEPC) and EIT-based regional compliance (PEEPEIT) methods. The differences of global and regional compliance (for both gravity-dependent and non-dependent regions) under the two PEEP conditions were compared. In addition, the EIT-based global inhomogeneity index (GI), the center of ventilation (CoV), and standard deviation of regional delayed ventilation (RVDSD) were also calculated and compared.ResultsA total of 12 children with pARDS (5 with severe and 7 with moderate pARDS) were included. PEEPC and PEEPEIT were identical in 6 patients. In others, the differences were only ± 2 cm H2O (one PEEP step). There were no statistical differences in global compliance at PEEPC and PEEPEIT [28.7 (2.84–33.15) vs. 29.74 (2.84–33.47) ml/cm H2O median (IQR), p = 0.028 (the significant level after adjusted for multiple comparison was 0.017)]. Furthermore, no differences were found in regional compliances and other EIT-based parameters measuring spatial and temporal ventilation distributions.ConclusionAlthough EIT provided information on ventilation distribution, PEEP selected with the best Crs might be non-inferior to EIT-guided regional ventilation in moderate-to-severe pARDS. Further study with a large sample size is required to confirm the finding.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.805680/fullacute respiratory distress syndromelung protective ventilationelectrical impedance tomographypediatricsrespiratory compliance |
spellingShingle | Hong Ren Li Xie Zhulin Wang Xiaoliao Tang Botao Ning Teng Teng Juan Qian Ying Wang Lijun Fu Zhanqi Zhao Zhanqi Zhao Long Xiang Long Xiang Comparison of Global and Regional Compliance-Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration on Regional Lung Ventilation in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Frontiers in Medicine acute respiratory distress syndrome lung protective ventilation electrical impedance tomography pediatrics respiratory compliance |
title | Comparison of Global and Regional Compliance-Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration on Regional Lung Ventilation in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
title_full | Comparison of Global and Regional Compliance-Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration on Regional Lung Ventilation in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Global and Regional Compliance-Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration on Regional Lung Ventilation in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Global and Regional Compliance-Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration on Regional Lung Ventilation in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
title_short | Comparison of Global and Regional Compliance-Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration on Regional Lung Ventilation in Moderate-to-Severe Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
title_sort | comparison of global and regional compliance guided positive end expiratory pressure titration on regional lung ventilation in moderate to severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome |
topic | acute respiratory distress syndrome lung protective ventilation electrical impedance tomography pediatrics respiratory compliance |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.805680/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongren comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT lixie comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT zhulinwang comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT xiaoliaotang comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT botaoning comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT tengteng comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT juanqian comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT yingwang comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT lijunfu comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT zhanqizhao comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT zhanqizhao comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT longxiang comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT longxiang comparisonofglobalandregionalcomplianceguidedpositiveendexpiratorypressuretitrationonregionallungventilationinmoderatetoseverepediatricacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome |