Low diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement on CT and MRI in diagnosis of spinal fractures in multiple myeloma

Skeletal disease is common in multiple myeloma. We investigated the inter-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy of spinal fractures diagnosed by computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from 12 myeloma patients. Two radiologists independently assessed the images. CT, MRI, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Viktor Dalen, Anne-Sofie Vegsgaard Olsen, Claude-Pierre Jerome, Jonn-Terje Geitung, Anders E.A. Dahm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Hematology Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/hr/article/view/9037
_version_ 1797936715011194880
author Viktor Dalen
Anne-Sofie Vegsgaard Olsen
Claude-Pierre Jerome
Jonn-Terje Geitung
Anders E.A. Dahm
author_facet Viktor Dalen
Anne-Sofie Vegsgaard Olsen
Claude-Pierre Jerome
Jonn-Terje Geitung
Anders E.A. Dahm
author_sort Viktor Dalen
collection DOAJ
description Skeletal disease is common in multiple myeloma. We investigated the inter-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy of spinal fractures diagnosed by computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from 12 myeloma patients. Two radiologists independently assessed the images. CT, MRI, and other images were combined to a gold standard. The inter-observer agreement was assessed with Cohen’s kappa. Radiologist 1 diagnosed 20 malignant spinal fractures on CT and 26 on MRI, while radiologist 2 diagnosed 12 malignant spinal fractures on CT and 22 on MRI. In comparison the gold standard diagnosed 10 malignant spinal fractures. The sensitivity for malignant fractures varied from 0.5 to 1 for CT and MRI, and the specificity varied from 0.17 to 0.67. On MRI, the specificity for malignant spinal fractures was 0.17 for both radiologists. The inter-observer agreement for malignant spinal fractures on CT was -0.42 (Cohen’s kappa) and -0.13 for MRI, while for osteoporotic fractures it was -0.24 for CT and 0.53 for MRI. We conclude that malignant spinal fractures were over-diagnosed on CT and MRI. The inter-observer agreement was extremely poor.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T18:34:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e3ce0caa9a1e4d7fb1615b9f18528529
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2038-8322
2038-8330
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T18:34:41Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Hematology Reports
spelling doaj.art-e3ce0caa9a1e4d7fb1615b9f185285292023-02-02T02:20:47ZengMDPI AGHematology Reports2038-83222038-83302021-10-0113310.4081/hr.2021.9037Low diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement on CT and MRI in diagnosis of spinal fractures in multiple myelomaViktor Dalen0Anne-Sofie Vegsgaard Olsen1Claude-Pierre Jerome2Jonn-Terje Geitung3Anders E.A. Dahm4Medical Faculty, University of OsloMedical Faculty, University of OsloDepartment of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, LørenskogDepartment of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of OsloInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo; Department of Haematology, Akershus University Hospital, LørenskogSkeletal disease is common in multiple myeloma. We investigated the inter-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy of spinal fractures diagnosed by computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from 12 myeloma patients. Two radiologists independently assessed the images. CT, MRI, and other images were combined to a gold standard. The inter-observer agreement was assessed with Cohen’s kappa. Radiologist 1 diagnosed 20 malignant spinal fractures on CT and 26 on MRI, while radiologist 2 diagnosed 12 malignant spinal fractures on CT and 22 on MRI. In comparison the gold standard diagnosed 10 malignant spinal fractures. The sensitivity for malignant fractures varied from 0.5 to 1 for CT and MRI, and the specificity varied from 0.17 to 0.67. On MRI, the specificity for malignant spinal fractures was 0.17 for both radiologists. The inter-observer agreement for malignant spinal fractures on CT was -0.42 (Cohen’s kappa) and -0.13 for MRI, while for osteoporotic fractures it was -0.24 for CT and 0.53 for MRI. We conclude that malignant spinal fractures were over-diagnosed on CT and MRI. The inter-observer agreement was extremely poor.https://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/hr/article/view/9037Diagnostic specificitymalignant fracturesosteoporotic fracturesdiagnostic imaginghaematologymultiple myeloma
spellingShingle Viktor Dalen
Anne-Sofie Vegsgaard Olsen
Claude-Pierre Jerome
Jonn-Terje Geitung
Anders E.A. Dahm
Low diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement on CT and MRI in diagnosis of spinal fractures in multiple myeloma
Hematology Reports
Diagnostic specificity
malignant fractures
osteoporotic fractures
diagnostic imaging
haematology
multiple myeloma
title Low diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement on CT and MRI in diagnosis of spinal fractures in multiple myeloma
title_full Low diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement on CT and MRI in diagnosis of spinal fractures in multiple myeloma
title_fullStr Low diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement on CT and MRI in diagnosis of spinal fractures in multiple myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Low diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement on CT and MRI in diagnosis of spinal fractures in multiple myeloma
title_short Low diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement on CT and MRI in diagnosis of spinal fractures in multiple myeloma
title_sort low diagnostic accuracy and inter observer agreement on ct and mri in diagnosis of spinal fractures in multiple myeloma
topic Diagnostic specificity
malignant fractures
osteoporotic fractures
diagnostic imaging
haematology
multiple myeloma
url https://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/hr/article/view/9037
work_keys_str_mv AT viktordalen lowdiagnosticaccuracyandinterobserveragreementonctandmriindiagnosisofspinalfracturesinmultiplemyeloma
AT annesofievegsgaardolsen lowdiagnosticaccuracyandinterobserveragreementonctandmriindiagnosisofspinalfracturesinmultiplemyeloma
AT claudepierrejerome lowdiagnosticaccuracyandinterobserveragreementonctandmriindiagnosisofspinalfracturesinmultiplemyeloma
AT jonnterjegeitung lowdiagnosticaccuracyandinterobserveragreementonctandmriindiagnosisofspinalfracturesinmultiplemyeloma
AT anderseadahm lowdiagnosticaccuracyandinterobserveragreementonctandmriindiagnosisofspinalfracturesinmultiplemyeloma