Hume’s theory of social constitution of the self

Hume distinguishes between the self of thought and imagination and the self of the passions. He is criticized for contradicting himself as he allegedly attributes fictitiousness to the self in book one of the Treatise but later reintroduces the self in books two and three. Hume’s account of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Azeri Siyaves
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade 2019-01-01
Series:Filozofija i Društvo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2019/0353-57381904511A.pdf
_version_ 1819225116681175040
author Azeri Siyaves
author_facet Azeri Siyaves
author_sort Azeri Siyaves
collection DOAJ
description Hume distinguishes between the self of thought and imagination and the self of the passions. He is criticized for contradicting himself as he allegedly attributes fictitiousness to the self in book one of the Treatise but later reintroduces the self in books two and three. Hume’s account of the idea of the self, however, is not contradictory: he shows the impossibility of a pure associationist-empiricist account of the self. Instead, he proposes a social account of the constitution of the idea of the self and consciousness. In doing so, Hume’s account of the self anticipates social-historical theories of the self.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T10:04:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e3d2ad41378d4b2b906d32e5c1dd4c59
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0353-5738
2334-8577
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-23T10:04:29Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
record_format Article
series Filozofija i Društvo
spelling doaj.art-e3d2ad41378d4b2b906d32e5c1dd4c592022-12-21T17:51:07ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382334-85772019-01-0130451153410.2298/FID1904511A0353-57381904511AHume’s theory of social constitution of the selfAzeri Siyaves0Archives Henri-Poincaré - Philosophie et Recherches sur les Sciences et les Technologies (AHP-PReST), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceHume distinguishes between the self of thought and imagination and the self of the passions. He is criticized for contradicting himself as he allegedly attributes fictitiousness to the self in book one of the Treatise but later reintroduces the self in books two and three. Hume’s account of the idea of the self, however, is not contradictory: he shows the impossibility of a pure associationist-empiricist account of the self. Instead, he proposes a social account of the constitution of the idea of the self and consciousness. In doing so, Hume’s account of the self anticipates social-historical theories of the self.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2019/0353-57381904511A.pdfhumeconsciousnessselfsubjectivity
spellingShingle Azeri Siyaves
Hume’s theory of social constitution of the self
Filozofija i Društvo
hume
consciousness
self
subjectivity
title Hume’s theory of social constitution of the self
title_full Hume’s theory of social constitution of the self
title_fullStr Hume’s theory of social constitution of the self
title_full_unstemmed Hume’s theory of social constitution of the self
title_short Hume’s theory of social constitution of the self
title_sort hume s theory of social constitution of the self
topic hume
consciousness
self
subjectivity
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2019/0353-57381904511A.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT azerisiyaves humestheoryofsocialconstitutionoftheself