Scientists' Reputations Are Based on Getting It Right, Not Being Right.
Replication is vital for increasing precision and accuracy of scientific claims. However, when replications "succeed" or "fail," they could have reputational consequences for the claim's originators. Surveys of United States adults (N = 4,786), undergraduates (N = 428), and...
Main Authors: | Charles R Ebersole, Jordan R Axt, Brian A Nosek |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-05-01
|
Series: | PLoS Biology |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4865149?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Getting it right is better than being right, right?
by: Jim A. Reekers
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Getting it right: being smarter about clinical trials.
by: Barnett S Kramer, et al.
Published: (2006-04-01) -
Getting it right on the road
by: Carvalho, Martin, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Reputational scoring and the right to an explanation
by: Federico Galli
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Being right vs. getting it right: orientation to being recorded in psychotherapeutic interaction as disaffiliative vs. affiliative practice
by: Michael M. Franzen, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01)