Integrating Social Forestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Indonesia

Social forestry (SF) has long been implemented in production and protected forests in Indonesia. SF is considered to be a win–win solution for occupied and cultivated forest areas. The aim of this paper was to review the implementation of social forestry in Indonesia and its strengths and challenges...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hendra Gunawan, Irma Yeny, Endang Karlina, Sri Suharti, Murniati, Subarudi, Budi Mulyanto, Sulistya Ekawati, Raden Garsetiasih, Pratiwi, Bugi Kabul Sumirat, Reny Sawitri, Nur M. Heriyanto, Mariana Takandjandji, Asmanah Widarti, Surati, Desmiwati, Titi Kalima, Rachman Effendi, Edwin Martin, Nur Arifatul Ulya, Sylviani, Ari Nurlia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/13/12/2152
_version_ 1797458410248077312
author Hendra Gunawan
Irma Yeny
Endang Karlina
Sri Suharti
Murniati
Subarudi
Budi Mulyanto
Sulistya Ekawati
Raden Garsetiasih
Pratiwi
Bugi Kabul Sumirat
Reny Sawitri
Nur M. Heriyanto
Mariana Takandjandji
Asmanah Widarti
Surati
Desmiwati
Titi Kalima
Rachman Effendi
Edwin Martin
Nur Arifatul Ulya
Sylviani
Ari Nurlia
author_facet Hendra Gunawan
Irma Yeny
Endang Karlina
Sri Suharti
Murniati
Subarudi
Budi Mulyanto
Sulistya Ekawati
Raden Garsetiasih
Pratiwi
Bugi Kabul Sumirat
Reny Sawitri
Nur M. Heriyanto
Mariana Takandjandji
Asmanah Widarti
Surati
Desmiwati
Titi Kalima
Rachman Effendi
Edwin Martin
Nur Arifatul Ulya
Sylviani
Ari Nurlia
author_sort Hendra Gunawan
collection DOAJ
description Social forestry (SF) has long been implemented in production and protected forests in Indonesia. SF is considered to be a win–win solution for occupied and cultivated forest areas. The aim of this paper was to review the implementation of social forestry in Indonesia and its strengths and challenges. The secondary purpose was to synthesize the lessons learned and recommendations for the government about designing SF that can integrate the objective of forest biodiversity conservation and the social welfare of the surrounding communities. The study used a systematic literature review (SLR) of international and national peer-reviewed articles. The results of the study indicate that SF is intended to achieve benefits in three main areas: social, economic, and ecological. However, the review found that the ecological aspects of biodiversity conservation often receive less attention compared to the social and economic goals. A strong point of SF implementation is increasing community access to forest land use, while a challenge that must be resolved is that including communities in forest management can result in fragmentation and changes to animal habitats; thus, there is the potential for population decline and extinction. This study advises policymakers to pay more attention to ecological functions to ensure forest sustainability in SF development.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:36:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e3db89ef5ec544588194d489a00b290c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:36:43Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-e3db89ef5ec544588194d489a00b290c2023-11-24T14:56:20ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072022-12-011312215210.3390/f13122152Integrating Social Forestry and Biodiversity Conservation in IndonesiaHendra Gunawan0Irma Yeny1Endang Karlina2Sri Suharti3Murniati4Subarudi5Budi Mulyanto6Sulistya Ekawati7Raden Garsetiasih8Pratiwi9Bugi Kabul Sumirat10Reny Sawitri11Nur M. Heriyanto12Mariana Takandjandji13Asmanah Widarti14Surati15Desmiwati16Titi Kalima17Rachman Effendi18Edwin Martin19Nur Arifatul Ulya20Sylviani21Ari Nurlia22Research Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), JL. Gatot Subroto No. 10, Jakarta 12710, IndonesiaFaculty of Agriculture, IPB University, JL. Raya Darmaga Km. 8, Bogor 16680, IndonesiaResearch Center for Society and Culture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gedung Sasana Widya Sarwono Lantai 06, JL. Jend. Gatot Subroto No.10, Jakarta 12710, IndonesiaResearch Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Society and Culture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gedung Sasana Widya Sarwono Lantai 06, JL. Jend. Gatot Subroto No.10, Jakarta 12710, IndonesiaResearch Center for Society and Culture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gedung Sasana Widya Sarwono Lantai 06, JL. Jend. Gatot Subroto No.10, Jakarta 12710, IndonesiaResearch Center for Society and Culture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gedung Sasana Widya Sarwono Lantai 06, JL. Jend. Gatot Subroto No.10, Jakarta 12710, IndonesiaResearch Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Ecology and Ethnobiology-National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jalan Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km.46, Cibinong 16911, IndonesiaResearch Center for Society and Culture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gedung Sasana Widya Sarwono Lantai 06, JL. Jend. Gatot Subroto No.10, Jakarta 12710, IndonesiaResearch Center for Behavioral and Circular Economics, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gedung Widya Graha Lt.4, JL. Jend. Gatot Subroto No.10, Jakarta 12710, IndonesiaResearch Center for Society and Culture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gedung Sasana Widya Sarwono Lantai 06, JL. Jend. Gatot Subroto No.10, Jakarta 12710, IndonesiaResearch Center for Society and Culture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gedung Sasana Widya Sarwono Lantai 06, JL. Jend. Gatot Subroto No.10, Jakarta 12710, IndonesiaSocial forestry (SF) has long been implemented in production and protected forests in Indonesia. SF is considered to be a win–win solution for occupied and cultivated forest areas. The aim of this paper was to review the implementation of social forestry in Indonesia and its strengths and challenges. The secondary purpose was to synthesize the lessons learned and recommendations for the government about designing SF that can integrate the objective of forest biodiversity conservation and the social welfare of the surrounding communities. The study used a systematic literature review (SLR) of international and national peer-reviewed articles. The results of the study indicate that SF is intended to achieve benefits in three main areas: social, economic, and ecological. However, the review found that the ecological aspects of biodiversity conservation often receive less attention compared to the social and economic goals. A strong point of SF implementation is increasing community access to forest land use, while a challenge that must be resolved is that including communities in forest management can result in fragmentation and changes to animal habitats; thus, there is the potential for population decline and extinction. This study advises policymakers to pay more attention to ecological functions to ensure forest sustainability in SF development.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/13/12/2152communitylivelihoodconservationbiodiversityfragmentationdisturbance
spellingShingle Hendra Gunawan
Irma Yeny
Endang Karlina
Sri Suharti
Murniati
Subarudi
Budi Mulyanto
Sulistya Ekawati
Raden Garsetiasih
Pratiwi
Bugi Kabul Sumirat
Reny Sawitri
Nur M. Heriyanto
Mariana Takandjandji
Asmanah Widarti
Surati
Desmiwati
Titi Kalima
Rachman Effendi
Edwin Martin
Nur Arifatul Ulya
Sylviani
Ari Nurlia
Integrating Social Forestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Indonesia
Forests
community
livelihood
conservation
biodiversity
fragmentation
disturbance
title Integrating Social Forestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Indonesia
title_full Integrating Social Forestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Indonesia
title_fullStr Integrating Social Forestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Integrating Social Forestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Indonesia
title_short Integrating Social Forestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Indonesia
title_sort integrating social forestry and biodiversity conservation in indonesia
topic community
livelihood
conservation
biodiversity
fragmentation
disturbance
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/13/12/2152
work_keys_str_mv AT hendragunawan integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT irmayeny integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT endangkarlina integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT srisuharti integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT murniati integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT subarudi integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT budimulyanto integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT sulistyaekawati integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT radengarsetiasih integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT pratiwi integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT bugikabulsumirat integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT renysawitri integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT nurmheriyanto integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT marianatakandjandji integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT asmanahwidarti integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT surati integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT desmiwati integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT titikalima integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT rachmaneffendi integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT edwinmartin integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT nurarifatululya integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT sylviani integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia
AT arinurlia integratingsocialforestryandbiodiversityconservationinindonesia