The idea of a university: beyond étatisme, managerialism, and “ivory tower” (on intermediary functions of a university)

Modern universities often become a subject of discussion in the public sphere, during which the relevance of university programs, the financing of science and higher education, and a number of other issues are discussed. These discussions again and again prompt political theorists to reflect on t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kirill G. Filimonov, Andrey V. Topychkanov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Law 2020-07-01
Series:Антиномии
Subjects:
Online Access:http://yearbook.uran.ru/images/files/Ant_2_20_104126.pdf
_version_ 1818429976742985728
author Kirill G. Filimonov
Andrey V. Topychkanov
author_facet Kirill G. Filimonov
Andrey V. Topychkanov
author_sort Kirill G. Filimonov
collection DOAJ
description Modern universities often become a subject of discussion in the public sphere, during which the relevance of university programs, the financing of science and higher education, and a number of other issues are discussed. These discussions again and again prompt political theorists to reflect on the “idea of a university”. These ideas are associated with values, expectations and beliefs, and are most often expressed in the form of normative representations based either on pragmatism that define the university as a functional element of the state system, or on utilitarianism that required from the university to satisfy the economic demands of society, or on idealism that forces position the university as an “ivory tower”. The presented positions somewhat exaggerate the value of some of the university’s abilities to the detriment of others and distort not only the optics of research, but also the social beliefs that influences the development of state systems and universities. Based on the institutional approach, the authors of this article propose a theoretical position that allows to grasp the current pragmatics of the university community, the market and the state regarding the development of universities and their contribution to the organization of the societal order. According to this position, the university should be considered as an intermediary institution that has public subjectivity; acts as an organizational form of the university community and agent of societal relations; carries out a communicative exchange with the external environment (represented by societies, states, markets); creates conditions for the interaction of various agents of societal relations, including on their own space via a formalized rational public discussion; finally, it produces knowledge that influences the organization of the societal order. All of this taken together allows us to consider the university a mediator. This position of the university allows it to successfully fulfill its mediating role, both within the university corporation and outside it, balance between different social expectations and remain in one of the most stable and adaptive organizational forms that constitute the societal order.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T15:26:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e3e1d97563594fa78bab167a6f98e974
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2686-7206
2686-925X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T15:26:04Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Law
record_format Article
series Антиномии
spelling doaj.art-e3e1d97563594fa78bab167a6f98e9742022-12-21T22:56:02ZengUral Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and LawАнтиномии2686-72062686-925X2020-07-0120210412610.24411/2686-7206-2020-10204The idea of a university: beyond étatisme, managerialism, and “ivory tower” (on intermediary functions of a university)Kirill G. Filimonovhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-8666Andrey V. Topychkanovhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5372-4414Modern universities often become a subject of discussion in the public sphere, during which the relevance of university programs, the financing of science and higher education, and a number of other issues are discussed. These discussions again and again prompt political theorists to reflect on the “idea of a university”. These ideas are associated with values, expectations and beliefs, and are most often expressed in the form of normative representations based either on pragmatism that define the university as a functional element of the state system, or on utilitarianism that required from the university to satisfy the economic demands of society, or on idealism that forces position the university as an “ivory tower”. The presented positions somewhat exaggerate the value of some of the university’s abilities to the detriment of others and distort not only the optics of research, but also the social beliefs that influences the development of state systems and universities. Based on the institutional approach, the authors of this article propose a theoretical position that allows to grasp the current pragmatics of the university community, the market and the state regarding the development of universities and their contribution to the organization of the societal order. According to this position, the university should be considered as an intermediary institution that has public subjectivity; acts as an organizational form of the university community and agent of societal relations; carries out a communicative exchange with the external environment (represented by societies, states, markets); creates conditions for the interaction of various agents of societal relations, including on their own space via a formalized rational public discussion; finally, it produces knowledge that influences the organization of the societal order. All of this taken together allows us to consider the university a mediator. This position of the university allows it to successfully fulfill its mediating role, both within the university corporation and outside it, balance between different social expectations and remain in one of the most stable and adaptive organizational forms that constitute the societal order.http://yearbook.uran.ru/images/files/Ant_2_20_104126.pdfuniversitythe idea of a universityétatismemanagerialismmediationintermediaryinstitutionsocietal order
spellingShingle Kirill G. Filimonov
Andrey V. Topychkanov
The idea of a university: beyond étatisme, managerialism, and “ivory tower” (on intermediary functions of a university)
Антиномии
university
the idea of a university
étatisme
managerialism
mediation
intermediaryinstitution
societal order
title The idea of a university: beyond étatisme, managerialism, and “ivory tower” (on intermediary functions of a university)
title_full The idea of a university: beyond étatisme, managerialism, and “ivory tower” (on intermediary functions of a university)
title_fullStr The idea of a university: beyond étatisme, managerialism, and “ivory tower” (on intermediary functions of a university)
title_full_unstemmed The idea of a university: beyond étatisme, managerialism, and “ivory tower” (on intermediary functions of a university)
title_short The idea of a university: beyond étatisme, managerialism, and “ivory tower” (on intermediary functions of a university)
title_sort idea of a university beyond etatisme managerialism and ivory tower on intermediary functions of a university
topic university
the idea of a university
étatisme
managerialism
mediation
intermediaryinstitution
societal order
url http://yearbook.uran.ru/images/files/Ant_2_20_104126.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kirillgfilimonov theideaofauniversitybeyondetatismemanagerialismandivorytoweronintermediaryfunctionsofauniversity
AT andreyvtopychkanov theideaofauniversitybeyondetatismemanagerialismandivorytoweronintermediaryfunctionsofauniversity
AT kirillgfilimonov ideaofauniversitybeyondetatismemanagerialismandivorytoweronintermediaryfunctionsofauniversity
AT andreyvtopychkanov ideaofauniversitybeyondetatismemanagerialismandivorytoweronintermediaryfunctionsofauniversity