Differences of Training Structures on Stimulus Class Formation in Computational Agents

Stimulus Equivalence (SE) is a behavioural phenomenon in which organisms respond functionally to stimuli without explicit training. SE provides a framework in the experimental analysis of behaviour to study language, symbolic behaviour, and cognition. It is also a frequently discussed matter in inte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexis Carrillo, Moisés Betancort
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/7/4/39
_version_ 1827744175781576704
author Alexis Carrillo
Moisés Betancort
author_facet Alexis Carrillo
Moisés Betancort
author_sort Alexis Carrillo
collection DOAJ
description Stimulus Equivalence (SE) is a behavioural phenomenon in which organisms respond functionally to stimuli without explicit training. SE provides a framework in the experimental analysis of behaviour to study language, symbolic behaviour, and cognition. It is also a frequently discussed matter in interdisciplinary research, linking behaviour analysis with linguistics and neuroscience. Previous research has attempted to replicate SE with computational agents, mostly based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models. The aim of this paper was to analyse the effect of three Training Structures (TSs) on stimulus class formation in a simulation with ANNs as computational agents performing a classification task, in a matching-to-sample procedure. Twelve simulations were carried out as a product of the implementation of four ANN architectures on the three TSs. SE was not achieved, but two agents showed an emergent response on half of the transitivity test pairs on linear sequence TSs and reflexivity on one member of the class. The results suggested that an ANN with a large enough number of units in a hidden layer can perform a limited number of emergent relations within specific experimental conditions: reflexivity on B and transitivity on AC, when pairs AB and BC are trained on a three-member stimulus class and tested in a classification task. Reinforcement learning is proposed as the framework for further simulations.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T04:40:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e3e33cf4cbc24d0ab215297d8c373a32
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2414-4088
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T04:40:49Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
spelling doaj.art-e3e33cf4cbc24d0ab215297d8c373a322023-11-17T20:42:23ZengMDPI AGMultimodal Technologies and Interaction2414-40882023-04-01743910.3390/mti7040039Differences of Training Structures on Stimulus Class Formation in Computational AgentsAlexis Carrillo0Moisés Betancort1Departamento de Psicología Clínica, Psicobiología y Metodología, Campus de Guajara, Universidad de La Laguna, Apartado 456, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, SpainDepartamento de Psicología Clínica, Psicobiología y Metodología, Campus de Guajara, Universidad de La Laguna, Apartado 456, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, SpainStimulus Equivalence (SE) is a behavioural phenomenon in which organisms respond functionally to stimuli without explicit training. SE provides a framework in the experimental analysis of behaviour to study language, symbolic behaviour, and cognition. It is also a frequently discussed matter in interdisciplinary research, linking behaviour analysis with linguistics and neuroscience. Previous research has attempted to replicate SE with computational agents, mostly based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models. The aim of this paper was to analyse the effect of three Training Structures (TSs) on stimulus class formation in a simulation with ANNs as computational agents performing a classification task, in a matching-to-sample procedure. Twelve simulations were carried out as a product of the implementation of four ANN architectures on the three TSs. SE was not achieved, but two agents showed an emergent response on half of the transitivity test pairs on linear sequence TSs and reflexivity on one member of the class. The results suggested that an ANN with a large enough number of units in a hidden layer can perform a limited number of emergent relations within specific experimental conditions: reflexivity on B and transitivity on AC, when pairs AB and BC are trained on a three-member stimulus class and tested in a classification task. Reinforcement learning is proposed as the framework for further simulations.https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/7/4/39stimulus equivalencemachine learningmatching to sampleartificial neural network
spellingShingle Alexis Carrillo
Moisés Betancort
Differences of Training Structures on Stimulus Class Formation in Computational Agents
Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
stimulus equivalence
machine learning
matching to sample
artificial neural network
title Differences of Training Structures on Stimulus Class Formation in Computational Agents
title_full Differences of Training Structures on Stimulus Class Formation in Computational Agents
title_fullStr Differences of Training Structures on Stimulus Class Formation in Computational Agents
title_full_unstemmed Differences of Training Structures on Stimulus Class Formation in Computational Agents
title_short Differences of Training Structures on Stimulus Class Formation in Computational Agents
title_sort differences of training structures on stimulus class formation in computational agents
topic stimulus equivalence
machine learning
matching to sample
artificial neural network
url https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/7/4/39
work_keys_str_mv AT alexiscarrillo differencesoftrainingstructuresonstimulusclassformationincomputationalagents
AT moisesbetancort differencesoftrainingstructuresonstimulusclassformationincomputationalagents