Evaluation of evapotranspiration methods for model validation in a semi-arid watershed in northern China

This study evaluates the performance of four evapotranspiration methods (Priestley-Taylor, Penman-Monteith, Hargreaves and Makkink) of differing complexity in a semi-arid environment in north China. The results are compared to observed water vapour fluxes derived from eddy flux measurements. The ana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. Schneider, B. Ketzer, L. Breuer, K. B. Vaché, C. Bernhofer, H.-G. Frede
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2007-05-01
Series:Advances in Geosciences
Online Access:http://www.adv-geosci.net/11/37/2007/adgeo-11-37-2007.pdf
_version_ 1818759005845061632
author K. Schneider
B. Ketzer
L. Breuer
K. B. Vaché
C. Bernhofer
H.-G. Frede
author_facet K. Schneider
B. Ketzer
L. Breuer
K. B. Vaché
C. Bernhofer
H.-G. Frede
author_sort K. Schneider
collection DOAJ
description This study evaluates the performance of four evapotranspiration methods (Priestley-Taylor, Penman-Monteith, Hargreaves and Makkink) of differing complexity in a semi-arid environment in north China. The results are compared to observed water vapour fluxes derived from eddy flux measurements. The analysis became necessary after discharge simulations using an automatically calibrated version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) failed to reproduce runoff measurements. Although the study area receives most of the annual rainfall during the vegetation period, high temperatures can cause water scarcity. We investigate which evapotranspiration method is most suitable for this environment and whether the model performance of SWAT can be improved with the most adequate evapotranspiration method. <br><br> The evapotranspiration models were tested in two consecutive years with different rainfall amounts. In general, the simple Hargreaves and Makkink equations outmatch the more complex Priestley-Taylor and Penman-Monteith methods, although their performance depended on water availability. Effects on the quality of SWAT runoff simulations, however, remained minor. Although evapotranspiration is an important process in the hydrology of this steppe environment, our analysis indicates that other driving factors still need to be identified to improve SWAT simulations.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T06:35:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e3e3437286fc4dda8275a26b4636b021
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7340
1680-7359
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T06:35:51Z
publishDate 2007-05-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Advances in Geosciences
spelling doaj.art-e3e3437286fc4dda8275a26b4636b0212022-12-21T21:17:47ZengCopernicus PublicationsAdvances in Geosciences1680-73401680-73592007-05-01113742Evaluation of evapotranspiration methods for model validation in a semi-arid watershed in northern ChinaK. SchneiderB. KetzerL. BreuerK. B. VachéC. BernhoferH.-G. FredeThis study evaluates the performance of four evapotranspiration methods (Priestley-Taylor, Penman-Monteith, Hargreaves and Makkink) of differing complexity in a semi-arid environment in north China. The results are compared to observed water vapour fluxes derived from eddy flux measurements. The analysis became necessary after discharge simulations using an automatically calibrated version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) failed to reproduce runoff measurements. Although the study area receives most of the annual rainfall during the vegetation period, high temperatures can cause water scarcity. We investigate which evapotranspiration method is most suitable for this environment and whether the model performance of SWAT can be improved with the most adequate evapotranspiration method. <br><br> The evapotranspiration models were tested in two consecutive years with different rainfall amounts. In general, the simple Hargreaves and Makkink equations outmatch the more complex Priestley-Taylor and Penman-Monteith methods, although their performance depended on water availability. Effects on the quality of SWAT runoff simulations, however, remained minor. Although evapotranspiration is an important process in the hydrology of this steppe environment, our analysis indicates that other driving factors still need to be identified to improve SWAT simulations.http://www.adv-geosci.net/11/37/2007/adgeo-11-37-2007.pdf
spellingShingle K. Schneider
B. Ketzer
L. Breuer
K. B. Vaché
C. Bernhofer
H.-G. Frede
Evaluation of evapotranspiration methods for model validation in a semi-arid watershed in northern China
Advances in Geosciences
title Evaluation of evapotranspiration methods for model validation in a semi-arid watershed in northern China
title_full Evaluation of evapotranspiration methods for model validation in a semi-arid watershed in northern China
title_fullStr Evaluation of evapotranspiration methods for model validation in a semi-arid watershed in northern China
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of evapotranspiration methods for model validation in a semi-arid watershed in northern China
title_short Evaluation of evapotranspiration methods for model validation in a semi-arid watershed in northern China
title_sort evaluation of evapotranspiration methods for model validation in a semi arid watershed in northern china
url http://www.adv-geosci.net/11/37/2007/adgeo-11-37-2007.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kschneider evaluationofevapotranspirationmethodsformodelvalidationinasemiaridwatershedinnorthernchina
AT bketzer evaluationofevapotranspirationmethodsformodelvalidationinasemiaridwatershedinnorthernchina
AT lbreuer evaluationofevapotranspirationmethodsformodelvalidationinasemiaridwatershedinnorthernchina
AT kbvache evaluationofevapotranspirationmethodsformodelvalidationinasemiaridwatershedinnorthernchina
AT cbernhofer evaluationofevapotranspirationmethodsformodelvalidationinasemiaridwatershedinnorthernchina
AT hgfrede evaluationofevapotranspirationmethodsformodelvalidationinasemiaridwatershedinnorthernchina