DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND FUNDAMENTALS RIGTHS: A STUDY ABOUT DISCOURSES OF ACCUSERS IN JURY PLENARY IN RECIFE, PE
The authors study prosecutors discourse in the Jury court in Recife city. The objective was to evaluate the respect for fundamental rights in the plenary session. Methodologically bibliographic review was done of the constitutional functions of the District Attorney and content analysis of the mater...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
2017-08-01
|
| Series: | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/29189/20995 |
| Summary: | The authors study prosecutors discourse in the Jury court in Recife city. The objective was to evaluate the respect for fundamental rights in the plenary session. Methodologically bibliographic review was done of the constitutional functions of the District Attorney and content analysis of the material collected by the ethnography research of the sessions. The researchers concluded that the oral arguments of the prosecution are used to manage security despite the constitutional fundamental rights, using elements of the criminal law. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1982-7636 |