Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort.
<h4>Background</h4>Early career researchers face a hypercompetitive funding environment. To help identify effective intervention strategies for early career researchers, we examined whether first-time NIH R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application were more s...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257559 |
| _version_ | 1798035806931124224 |
|---|---|
| author | Jamie Mihoko Doyle Michael T Baiocchi Michaela Kiernan |
| author_facet | Jamie Mihoko Doyle Michael T Baiocchi Michaela Kiernan |
| author_sort | Jamie Mihoko Doyle |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Early career researchers face a hypercompetitive funding environment. To help identify effective intervention strategies for early career researchers, we examined whether first-time NIH R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful at obtaining any R01 funding within 3 and 5 years than original, unfunded applicants who submitted new NIH applications, and we examined whether underrepresented minority (URM) applicants differentially benefited from resubmission. Our observational study is consistent with an NIH working group's recommendations to develop interventions to encourage resubmission.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>First-time applicants with US medical school academic faculty appointments who submitted an unfunded R01 application between 2000-2014 yielded 4,789 discussed and 7,019 not discussed applications. We then created comparable groups of first-time R01 applicants (resubmitted original R01 application or submitted new NIH applications) using optimal full matching that included applicant and application characteristics. Primary and subgroup analyses used generalized mixed models with obtaining any NIH R01 funding within 3 and 5 years as the two outcomes. A gamma sensitivity analysis was performed. URM applicants represented 11% and 12% of discussed and not discussed applications, respectively. First-time R01 applicants resubmitting their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful obtaining R01 funding within 3 and 5 years than applicants submitting new applications-for both discussed and not discussed applications: discussed within 3 years (OR 4.17 [95 CI 3.53, 4.93]) and 5 years (3.33 [2.82-3.92]); and not discussed within 3 years (2.81 [2.52, 3.13]) and 5 years (2.47 [2.22-2.74]). URM applicants additionally benefited within 5 years for not discussed applications.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Encouraging early career researchers applying as faculty at a school of medicine to resubmit R01 applications is a promising potential modifiable factor and intervention strategy. First-time R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application had log-odds of obtaining downstream R01 funding within 3 and 5 years 2-4 times higher than applicants who did not resubmit their original application and submitted new NIH applications instead. Findings held for both discussed and not discussed applications. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T21:03:23Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e3f074c6c01f4a589df7f3d5bb287ca0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T21:03:23Z |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-e3f074c6c01f4a589df7f3d5bb287ca02022-12-22T04:03:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-011611e025755910.1371/journal.pone.0257559Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort.Jamie Mihoko DoyleMichael T BaiocchiMichaela Kiernan<h4>Background</h4>Early career researchers face a hypercompetitive funding environment. To help identify effective intervention strategies for early career researchers, we examined whether first-time NIH R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful at obtaining any R01 funding within 3 and 5 years than original, unfunded applicants who submitted new NIH applications, and we examined whether underrepresented minority (URM) applicants differentially benefited from resubmission. Our observational study is consistent with an NIH working group's recommendations to develop interventions to encourage resubmission.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>First-time applicants with US medical school academic faculty appointments who submitted an unfunded R01 application between 2000-2014 yielded 4,789 discussed and 7,019 not discussed applications. We then created comparable groups of first-time R01 applicants (resubmitted original R01 application or submitted new NIH applications) using optimal full matching that included applicant and application characteristics. Primary and subgroup analyses used generalized mixed models with obtaining any NIH R01 funding within 3 and 5 years as the two outcomes. A gamma sensitivity analysis was performed. URM applicants represented 11% and 12% of discussed and not discussed applications, respectively. First-time R01 applicants resubmitting their original, unfunded R01 application were more successful obtaining R01 funding within 3 and 5 years than applicants submitting new applications-for both discussed and not discussed applications: discussed within 3 years (OR 4.17 [95 CI 3.53, 4.93]) and 5 years (3.33 [2.82-3.92]); and not discussed within 3 years (2.81 [2.52, 3.13]) and 5 years (2.47 [2.22-2.74]). URM applicants additionally benefited within 5 years for not discussed applications.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Encouraging early career researchers applying as faculty at a school of medicine to resubmit R01 applications is a promising potential modifiable factor and intervention strategy. First-time R01 applicants who resubmitted their original, unfunded R01 application had log-odds of obtaining downstream R01 funding within 3 and 5 years 2-4 times higher than applicants who did not resubmit their original application and submitted new NIH applications instead. Findings held for both discussed and not discussed applications.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257559 |
| spellingShingle | Jamie Mihoko Doyle Michael T Baiocchi Michaela Kiernan Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort. PLoS ONE |
| title | Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort. |
| title_full | Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort. |
| title_fullStr | Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort. |
| title_short | Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort. |
| title_sort | downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications a matched cohort |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257559 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jamiemihokodoyle downstreamfundingsuccessofearlycareerresearchersforresubmittedversusnewapplicationsamatchedcohort AT michaeltbaiocchi downstreamfundingsuccessofearlycareerresearchersforresubmittedversusnewapplicationsamatchedcohort AT michaelakiernan downstreamfundingsuccessofearlycareerresearchersforresubmittedversusnewapplicationsamatchedcohort |