Vaccinating Meat Chickens against <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella:</i> A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Foodborne enteritis is a major disease burden globally. Two of the most common causative bacterial enteropathogens in humans are <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> species which are strongly associated with the consumption of raw or contaminated chicken. The poultry i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adriana C. Castelo Taboada, Anthony Pavic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Vaccines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/11/1936
_version_ 1797463853895778304
author Adriana C. Castelo Taboada
Anthony Pavic
author_facet Adriana C. Castelo Taboada
Anthony Pavic
author_sort Adriana C. Castelo Taboada
collection DOAJ
description Foodborne enteritis is a major disease burden globally. Two of the most common causative bacterial enteropathogens in humans are <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> species which are strongly associated with the consumption of raw or contaminated chicken. The poultry industry has approached this issue by use of a multi-hurdle method across the production chain to reduce or eliminate this risk. The use of poultry vaccines is one of these control methods. A systematic review and meta-analysis of vaccination effects against caecal <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> were performed on primary research published between 2009 and 2022. Screening was conducted by three reviewers with one reviewer performing subsequent data extraction and one reviewer performing the risk of bias assessment. The confidence in cumulative evidence was evaluated based on the GRADE method. Meta-analyses were performed using standardised mean differences (SMDs) with additional analyses and random effects regression models on intervention effects grouped by the vaccine type. A total of 13 <i>Campylobacter</i> and 19 <i>Salmonella</i> studies satisfied the eligibility criteria for this review. Many studies included multi-arm interventions, resulting in a total of 25 <i>Campylobacter</i> and 34 <i>Salmonella</i> comparators which were synthesised. The analyses revealed a large reduction in pathogen levels; however, many effects required statistical adjustment due to unit of analysis errors. There was a moderate level of confidence in the reduction of <i>Campylobacter</i> by 0.93 SMD units (95% CI: −1.275 to −0.585; <i>p</i> value < 0.001) and a very low level of confidence in the reduction of <i>Salmonella</i> by 1.10 SMD units (95% CI: −1.419 to −0.776; <i>p</i> value < 0.001). The Chi<sup>2</sup> test for heterogeneity (<i>p</i> value 0.001 and <0.001 for <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella,</i> respectively) and the I<sup>2</sup> statistic (52.4% and 77.5% for <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella</i>, respectively) indicated high levels of heterogeneity in the SMDs across the comparators. The certainty of gathered evidence was also affected by a high risk of study bias mostly due to a lack of detailed reporting and, additionally for <i>Salmonella</i>, the presence of publication bias. Further research is recommended to source areas of heterogeneity, and a conscious effort to follow reporting guidelines and consider units of analysis can improve the strength of evidence gathered to provide recommendations to the industry.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:56:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e4194e9c847140d3a73b0fde56562b27
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-393X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:56:40Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Vaccines
spelling doaj.art-e4194e9c847140d3a73b0fde56562b272023-11-24T10:16:54ZengMDPI AGVaccines2076-393X2022-11-011011193610.3390/vaccines10111936Vaccinating Meat Chickens against <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella:</i> A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisAdriana C. Castelo Taboada0Anthony Pavic1Birling Laboratories Pty. Ltd., 975 The Northern Road, Bringelly, NSW 2556, AustraliaBirling Laboratories Pty. Ltd., 975 The Northern Road, Bringelly, NSW 2556, AustraliaFoodborne enteritis is a major disease burden globally. Two of the most common causative bacterial enteropathogens in humans are <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> species which are strongly associated with the consumption of raw or contaminated chicken. The poultry industry has approached this issue by use of a multi-hurdle method across the production chain to reduce or eliminate this risk. The use of poultry vaccines is one of these control methods. A systematic review and meta-analysis of vaccination effects against caecal <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> were performed on primary research published between 2009 and 2022. Screening was conducted by three reviewers with one reviewer performing subsequent data extraction and one reviewer performing the risk of bias assessment. The confidence in cumulative evidence was evaluated based on the GRADE method. Meta-analyses were performed using standardised mean differences (SMDs) with additional analyses and random effects regression models on intervention effects grouped by the vaccine type. A total of 13 <i>Campylobacter</i> and 19 <i>Salmonella</i> studies satisfied the eligibility criteria for this review. Many studies included multi-arm interventions, resulting in a total of 25 <i>Campylobacter</i> and 34 <i>Salmonella</i> comparators which were synthesised. The analyses revealed a large reduction in pathogen levels; however, many effects required statistical adjustment due to unit of analysis errors. There was a moderate level of confidence in the reduction of <i>Campylobacter</i> by 0.93 SMD units (95% CI: −1.275 to −0.585; <i>p</i> value < 0.001) and a very low level of confidence in the reduction of <i>Salmonella</i> by 1.10 SMD units (95% CI: −1.419 to −0.776; <i>p</i> value < 0.001). The Chi<sup>2</sup> test for heterogeneity (<i>p</i> value 0.001 and <0.001 for <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella,</i> respectively) and the I<sup>2</sup> statistic (52.4% and 77.5% for <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella</i>, respectively) indicated high levels of heterogeneity in the SMDs across the comparators. The certainty of gathered evidence was also affected by a high risk of study bias mostly due to a lack of detailed reporting and, additionally for <i>Salmonella</i>, the presence of publication bias. Further research is recommended to source areas of heterogeneity, and a conscious effort to follow reporting guidelines and consider units of analysis can improve the strength of evidence gathered to provide recommendations to the industry.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/11/1936bacteriacaecaimmunisationpoultrybroilerenteropathogen
spellingShingle Adriana C. Castelo Taboada
Anthony Pavic
Vaccinating Meat Chickens against <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella:</i> A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Vaccines
bacteria
caeca
immunisation
poultry
broiler
enteropathogen
title Vaccinating Meat Chickens against <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella:</i> A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Vaccinating Meat Chickens against <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella:</i> A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Vaccinating Meat Chickens against <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella:</i> A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Vaccinating Meat Chickens against <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella:</i> A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Vaccinating Meat Chickens against <i>Campylobacter</i> and <i>Salmonella:</i> A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort vaccinating meat chickens against i campylobacter i and i salmonella i a systematic review and meta analysis
topic bacteria
caeca
immunisation
poultry
broiler
enteropathogen
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/11/1936
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianaccastelotaboada vaccinatingmeatchickensagainsticampylobacteriandisalmonellaiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT anthonypavic vaccinatingmeatchickensagainsticampylobacteriandisalmonellaiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis