Critical Thinking versus Neurosexism
The aim of this paper is to offer a view of the assumptions that guide the practice of claiming sex differences in the brain. After the realization that much of the research and publication of neuroscientific findings assume such a difference, we found a great deal of what has been called neurosexis...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad Pontificia Comillas
2017-02-01
|
Series: | Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.upcomillas.es/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/7694 |
Summary: | The aim of this paper is to offer a view of the assumptions that guide the practice of claiming sex differences in the brain. After the realization that much of the research and publication of neuroscientific findings assume such a difference, we found a great deal of what has been called neurosexism. As a way to overcome it and from a feminist theory with a political commitment we propose a critical approach to the neurosciences. This is understood as a reflective collaboration between disciplines that could provide a framework for overcoming prejudices in thinking and designing science. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0031-4749 2386-5822 |