Assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Abstract The study aimed to evaluate the impact of abdominal drain placement (vs. omission) on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), focusing on complications, time to canalization, deambulation, and pain management. A prospectively-maintained institutional database wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesco Ditonno, Riccardo Bertolo, Alessandro Veccia, Sonia Costantino, Francesca Montanaro, Francesco Artoni, Alberto Baielli, Michele Boldini, Davide Brusa, Vincenzo De Marco, Filippo Migliorini, Antonio Benito Porcaro, Riccardo Rizzetto, Maria Angela Cerruto, Riccardo Autorino, Alessandro Antonelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2024-04-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59404-w
_version_ 1827264716929499136
author Francesco Ditonno
Riccardo Bertolo
Alessandro Veccia
Sonia Costantino
Francesca Montanaro
Francesco Artoni
Alberto Baielli
Michele Boldini
Davide Brusa
Vincenzo De Marco
Filippo Migliorini
Antonio Benito Porcaro
Riccardo Rizzetto
Maria Angela Cerruto
Riccardo Autorino
Alessandro Antonelli
author_facet Francesco Ditonno
Riccardo Bertolo
Alessandro Veccia
Sonia Costantino
Francesca Montanaro
Francesco Artoni
Alberto Baielli
Michele Boldini
Davide Brusa
Vincenzo De Marco
Filippo Migliorini
Antonio Benito Porcaro
Riccardo Rizzetto
Maria Angela Cerruto
Riccardo Autorino
Alessandro Antonelli
author_sort Francesco Ditonno
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The study aimed to evaluate the impact of abdominal drain placement (vs. omission) on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), focusing on complications, time to canalization, deambulation, and pain management. A prospectively-maintained institutional database was queried to get data of patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses between January 2018 and May 2023 at our Institution. Baseline, surgical, and postoperative data were collected. Retrieved patients were stratified based upon placement of abdominal drain (Y/N). Descriptive analyses comparing the two groups were conducted as appropriate. After adjusting for potential confounders, a logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate significant predictors of any grade and “major” complications. 342 patients were included: 192 patients in the “drain group” versus 150 patients in the “no-drain” group. Renal masses were larger (p < 0.001) and at higher complexity (RENAL score, p = 0.01), in the drain group. Procedures in the drain group had statistically significantly longer operative time, ischemia time, and higher blood loss (all p-values < 0.001). The urinary collecting system was more likely involved compared to the no-drain group (p = 0.01). At multivariate analysis, abdominal drainage was not a significant predictor of any grade (OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.33–1.87) and major postoperative complications (OR 3.62, 95%CI 0.53–9.68). Patients in the drain group experienced a statistically significantly higher hemoglobin drop (p < 0.01). Moreover, they exhibited statistically significant higher paracetamol consumption (p < 0.001) and need for additional opioids (p = 0.02). In summary, the study results suggest the safety of omitting drain placement and remark on the need for personalized decision-making, which considers patient and procedural factors.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T07:16:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e42d8901697d4eba9630d8f5fc7bebb3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-22T03:50:29Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-e42d8901697d4eba9630d8f5fc7bebb32024-04-28T11:20:20ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222024-04-011411810.1038/s41598-024-59404-wAssessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomyFrancesco Ditonno0Riccardo Bertolo1Alessandro Veccia2Sonia Costantino3Francesca Montanaro4Francesco Artoni5Alberto Baielli6Michele Boldini7Davide Brusa8Vincenzo De Marco9Filippo Migliorini10Antonio Benito Porcaro11Riccardo Rizzetto12Maria Angela Cerruto13Riccardo Autorino14Alessandro Antonelli15Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaDepartment of Urology, Rush University Medical CenterDepartment of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI VeronaAbstract The study aimed to evaluate the impact of abdominal drain placement (vs. omission) on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), focusing on complications, time to canalization, deambulation, and pain management. A prospectively-maintained institutional database was queried to get data of patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses between January 2018 and May 2023 at our Institution. Baseline, surgical, and postoperative data were collected. Retrieved patients were stratified based upon placement of abdominal drain (Y/N). Descriptive analyses comparing the two groups were conducted as appropriate. After adjusting for potential confounders, a logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate significant predictors of any grade and “major” complications. 342 patients were included: 192 patients in the “drain group” versus 150 patients in the “no-drain” group. Renal masses were larger (p < 0.001) and at higher complexity (RENAL score, p = 0.01), in the drain group. Procedures in the drain group had statistically significantly longer operative time, ischemia time, and higher blood loss (all p-values < 0.001). The urinary collecting system was more likely involved compared to the no-drain group (p = 0.01). At multivariate analysis, abdominal drainage was not a significant predictor of any grade (OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.33–1.87) and major postoperative complications (OR 3.62, 95%CI 0.53–9.68). Patients in the drain group experienced a statistically significantly higher hemoglobin drop (p < 0.01). Moreover, they exhibited statistically significant higher paracetamol consumption (p < 0.001) and need for additional opioids (p = 0.02). In summary, the study results suggest the safety of omitting drain placement and remark on the need for personalized decision-making, which considers patient and procedural factors.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59404-wRenal neoplasmRoboticNephrectomyDrainComplications
spellingShingle Francesco Ditonno
Riccardo Bertolo
Alessandro Veccia
Sonia Costantino
Francesca Montanaro
Francesco Artoni
Alberto Baielli
Michele Boldini
Davide Brusa
Vincenzo De Marco
Filippo Migliorini
Antonio Benito Porcaro
Riccardo Rizzetto
Maria Angela Cerruto
Riccardo Autorino
Alessandro Antonelli
Assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
Scientific Reports
Renal neoplasm
Robotic
Nephrectomy
Drain
Complications
title Assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
title_full Assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
title_fullStr Assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
title_short Assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
title_sort assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot assisted partial nephrectomy
topic Renal neoplasm
Robotic
Nephrectomy
Drain
Complications
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59404-w
work_keys_str_mv AT francescoditonno assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT riccardobertolo assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT alessandroveccia assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT soniacostantino assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT francescamontanaro assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT francescoartoni assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT albertobaielli assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT micheleboldini assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT davidebrusa assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT vincenzodemarco assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT filippomigliorini assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT antoniobenitoporcaro assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT riccardorizzetto assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT mariaangelacerruto assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT riccardoautorino assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy
AT alessandroantonelli assessingtheperioperativeoutcomesofabdominaldrainomissionafterrobotassistedpartialnephrectomy