Understanding Motivations for STI Testing: Comparing Presenters and Non-presenters Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a leading health risk to the college-aged population with young adults age 15- 24 accounting for half the new STI diagnoses in the United States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018). Despite these alarming numbers, approximately 50-70% of coll...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lindsay Neuberger, Megan Pabian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of North Florida 2019-07-01
Series:Florida Public Health Review
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1232&context=fphr
_version_ 1819092627021103104
author Lindsay Neuberger
Megan Pabian
author_facet Lindsay Neuberger
Megan Pabian
author_sort Lindsay Neuberger
collection DOAJ
description Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a leading health risk to the college-aged population with young adults age 15- 24 accounting for half the new STI diagnoses in the United States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018). Despite these alarming numbers, approximately 50-70% of college students have not been tested for STIs (Barth, Cook, Downs, Switzer, & Fischhoff, 2002; Bontempi, Mugno, Bulmer, Danvers, & Vancour, 2009; Boudewyns & Paquin, 2011). The current manuscript draws on the Theory of Planed Behavior and the Health Belief Model to explore how attitudes, norms, perceived behavioral control, and barriers contribute to STI testing intentions. In a novel extension of Boudewyns and Paquin (2011) and Wombacher, Dai, Matig, and Harrington (2018), two unique groups of students are examined: those presenting for STI testing at a university health center, and individuals who did not present for testing. Results suggest attitude is the strongest predictor of intention to get tested, and individuals with previous experience as well as those presenting have greater intentions to engage in future STI testing. This comparison between young adults engaging in a positive health behavior (i.e., testing) and those who have not illuminates differences between these populations and provides valuable insight for future STI testing campaign message development.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T22:58:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e42f78c92a224cf390257be4797b4a8a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2643-6248
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T22:58:37Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher University of North Florida
record_format Article
series Florida Public Health Review
spelling doaj.art-e42f78c92a224cf390257be4797b4a8a2022-12-21T18:47:23ZengUniversity of North FloridaFlorida Public Health Review2643-62482019-07-01167179Understanding Motivations for STI Testing: Comparing Presenters and Non-presenters Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief ModelLindsay Neuberger0Megan Pabian1Nicholson School of Communication and Media, University of Central FloridaUCF Health, University of Central FloridaSexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a leading health risk to the college-aged population with young adults age 15- 24 accounting for half the new STI diagnoses in the United States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018). Despite these alarming numbers, approximately 50-70% of college students have not been tested for STIs (Barth, Cook, Downs, Switzer, & Fischhoff, 2002; Bontempi, Mugno, Bulmer, Danvers, & Vancour, 2009; Boudewyns & Paquin, 2011). The current manuscript draws on the Theory of Planed Behavior and the Health Belief Model to explore how attitudes, norms, perceived behavioral control, and barriers contribute to STI testing intentions. In a novel extension of Boudewyns and Paquin (2011) and Wombacher, Dai, Matig, and Harrington (2018), two unique groups of students are examined: those presenting for STI testing at a university health center, and individuals who did not present for testing. Results suggest attitude is the strongest predictor of intention to get tested, and individuals with previous experience as well as those presenting have greater intentions to engage in future STI testing. This comparison between young adults engaging in a positive health behavior (i.e., testing) and those who have not illuminates differences between these populations and provides valuable insight for future STI testing campaign message development.https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1232&context=fphr
spellingShingle Lindsay Neuberger
Megan Pabian
Understanding Motivations for STI Testing: Comparing Presenters and Non-presenters Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model
Florida Public Health Review
title Understanding Motivations for STI Testing: Comparing Presenters and Non-presenters Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model
title_full Understanding Motivations for STI Testing: Comparing Presenters and Non-presenters Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model
title_fullStr Understanding Motivations for STI Testing: Comparing Presenters and Non-presenters Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Motivations for STI Testing: Comparing Presenters and Non-presenters Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model
title_short Understanding Motivations for STI Testing: Comparing Presenters and Non-presenters Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model
title_sort understanding motivations for sti testing comparing presenters and non presenters using the theory of planned behavior and health belief model
url https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1232&context=fphr
work_keys_str_mv AT lindsayneuberger understandingmotivationsforstitestingcomparingpresentersandnonpresentersusingthetheoryofplannedbehaviorandhealthbeliefmodel
AT meganpabian understandingmotivationsforstitestingcomparingpresentersandnonpresentersusingthetheoryofplannedbehaviorandhealthbeliefmodel