Evidence of Sustainable Learning from the Mastery Rubric for Ethical Reasoning

Interest in sustainable learning has been growing over the past 20 years but it has never been determined whether students—whose learning we are trying to sustain—can perceive either the sustainability of their learning or any of the features of this construct. A four-item survey was developed based...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rochelle E. Tractenberg, Kevin T. FitzGerald, Jeff Collmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-12-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/7/1/2
_version_ 1817990231412965376
author Rochelle E. Tractenberg
Kevin T. FitzGerald
Jeff Collmann
author_facet Rochelle E. Tractenberg
Kevin T. FitzGerald
Jeff Collmann
author_sort Rochelle E. Tractenberg
collection DOAJ
description Interest in sustainable learning has been growing over the past 20 years but it has never been determined whether students—whose learning we are trying to sustain—can perceive either the sustainability of their learning or any of the features of this construct. A four-item survey was developed based on a published definition of “sustainable learning”, and was sent to the 12 graduate students who have completed a new seminar in ethical reasoning. A thematic analysis of the narrative responses was submitted to a degrees-of-freedom analysis to determine the level and type of evidence for student perception of sustainability. Respondents (n = 9) endorsed each of the four dimensions of sustainable learning—and each gave examples for each dimension outside of, and after the end of, the course. One respondent endorsed all dimensions of sustainable learning, but was uncertain whether the course itself led to one particular sustainability dimension. While these results must be considered preliminary because our sample is small and the survey is the first of its kind, they suggest that graduate students can and do perceive each of the four features of sustainability. The survey needs refinement for future/wider use; but this four-dimensional definition could be useful to develop and promote (and assess) sustainable learning in higher education.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:56:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e44c6c361a4c4773b09ab2bdaf791451
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7102
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:56:45Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj.art-e44c6c361a4c4773b09ab2bdaf7914512022-12-22T02:21:35ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022016-12-0171210.3390/educsci7010002educsci7010002Evidence of Sustainable Learning from the Mastery Rubric for Ethical ReasoningRochelle E. Tractenberg0Kevin T. FitzGerald1Jeff Collmann2Collaborative for Research on Outcomes and Metrics; Departments of Neurology; Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomathematics; Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Suite 207 Building D, 4000 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20057, USACatholic Health Care Ethics; Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics; Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Suite 236, Building D, 4000 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20057, USAProfessor Emeritus, Georgetown University, 37th & O Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20057, USAInterest in sustainable learning has been growing over the past 20 years but it has never been determined whether students—whose learning we are trying to sustain—can perceive either the sustainability of their learning or any of the features of this construct. A four-item survey was developed based on a published definition of “sustainable learning”, and was sent to the 12 graduate students who have completed a new seminar in ethical reasoning. A thematic analysis of the narrative responses was submitted to a degrees-of-freedom analysis to determine the level and type of evidence for student perception of sustainability. Respondents (n = 9) endorsed each of the four dimensions of sustainable learning—and each gave examples for each dimension outside of, and after the end of, the course. One respondent endorsed all dimensions of sustainable learning, but was uncertain whether the course itself led to one particular sustainability dimension. While these results must be considered preliminary because our sample is small and the survey is the first of its kind, they suggest that graduate students can and do perceive each of the four features of sustainability. The survey needs refinement for future/wider use; but this four-dimensional definition could be useful to develop and promote (and assess) sustainable learning in higher education.http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/7/1/2Mastery Rubricsustainable learningethics educationmetacognitionactionable evidence of learning
spellingShingle Rochelle E. Tractenberg
Kevin T. FitzGerald
Jeff Collmann
Evidence of Sustainable Learning from the Mastery Rubric for Ethical Reasoning
Education Sciences
Mastery Rubric
sustainable learning
ethics education
metacognition
actionable evidence of learning
title Evidence of Sustainable Learning from the Mastery Rubric for Ethical Reasoning
title_full Evidence of Sustainable Learning from the Mastery Rubric for Ethical Reasoning
title_fullStr Evidence of Sustainable Learning from the Mastery Rubric for Ethical Reasoning
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of Sustainable Learning from the Mastery Rubric for Ethical Reasoning
title_short Evidence of Sustainable Learning from the Mastery Rubric for Ethical Reasoning
title_sort evidence of sustainable learning from the mastery rubric for ethical reasoning
topic Mastery Rubric
sustainable learning
ethics education
metacognition
actionable evidence of learning
url http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/7/1/2
work_keys_str_mv AT rochelleetractenberg evidenceofsustainablelearningfromthemasteryrubricforethicalreasoning
AT kevintfitzgerald evidenceofsustainablelearningfromthemasteryrubricforethicalreasoning
AT jeffcollmann evidenceofsustainablelearningfromthemasteryrubricforethicalreasoning