Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior
Characterization of critically stressed seismogenic fault systems in diverse tectonic settings can be used to explore the stress/frictional condition of faults, along with its sensitivity for seismicity modulation by periodic stress perturbation. However, the process of seismicity modulation in resp...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-05-01
|
Series: | Geoscience Frontiers |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987122000056 |
_version_ | 1797712909445365760 |
---|---|
author | Batakrushna Senapati Bhaskar Kundu Shuanggen Jin |
author_facet | Batakrushna Senapati Bhaskar Kundu Shuanggen Jin |
author_sort | Batakrushna Senapati |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Characterization of critically stressed seismogenic fault systems in diverse tectonic settings can be used to explore the stress/frictional condition of faults, along with its sensitivity for seismicity modulation by periodic stress perturbation. However, the process of seismicity modulation in response to external stress perturbation remains debated. In this paper, the characteristic difference in the seismicity modulation due to resonance destabilization phenomenon governed by rate-and-state friction is presented and validated with the globally reported cases of seismicity modulation in diverse tectonic settings. The relatively faster-moving plate boundary regions are equally susceptible for both shorter-period (e.g., semi-diurnal, diurnal, and other small tidal constituents) and long-period (e.g., semi-annual, annual, pole tide and pole wobble) seismicity modulation processes in response to stress perturbations from natural harmonic forcing, including tidal, semi-annual, annual, or multi-annual time scales. In contrast, slowly deforming stable plate interior regions and diffuse deformation zones appear to be more sensitive for long-period seismicity modulation of semi-annual, annual, or even multi-annual time scales but less sensitive for short-period seismicity modulation. This finding is also supported by the theoretical model predictions from the resonance destabilization process and worldwide documented natural observations of seismicity modulation in diverse types of tectonic settings. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T07:28:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e453f6d35fef43c894f0c8705f29a2c3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1674-9871 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T07:28:43Z |
publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Geoscience Frontiers |
spelling | doaj.art-e453f6d35fef43c894f0c8705f29a2c32023-09-02T21:58:43ZengElsevierGeoscience Frontiers1674-98712022-05-01133101352Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interiorBatakrushna Senapati0Bhaskar Kundu1Shuanggen Jin2Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, NIT Rourkela, Rourkela 769008, IndiaDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, NIT Rourkela, Rourkela 769008, India; Corresponding author.Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China; School of Remote Sensing and Geomatics Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaCharacterization of critically stressed seismogenic fault systems in diverse tectonic settings can be used to explore the stress/frictional condition of faults, along with its sensitivity for seismicity modulation by periodic stress perturbation. However, the process of seismicity modulation in response to external stress perturbation remains debated. In this paper, the characteristic difference in the seismicity modulation due to resonance destabilization phenomenon governed by rate-and-state friction is presented and validated with the globally reported cases of seismicity modulation in diverse tectonic settings. The relatively faster-moving plate boundary regions are equally susceptible for both shorter-period (e.g., semi-diurnal, diurnal, and other small tidal constituents) and long-period (e.g., semi-annual, annual, pole tide and pole wobble) seismicity modulation processes in response to stress perturbations from natural harmonic forcing, including tidal, semi-annual, annual, or multi-annual time scales. In contrast, slowly deforming stable plate interior regions and diffuse deformation zones appear to be more sensitive for long-period seismicity modulation of semi-annual, annual, or even multi-annual time scales but less sensitive for short-period seismicity modulation. This finding is also supported by the theoretical model predictions from the resonance destabilization process and worldwide documented natural observations of seismicity modulation in diverse types of tectonic settings.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987122000056Seismicity modulationResonance destabilizationPlate boundaryStable plate interior |
spellingShingle | Batakrushna Senapati Bhaskar Kundu Shuanggen Jin Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior Geoscience Frontiers Seismicity modulation Resonance destabilization Plate boundary Stable plate interior |
title | Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior |
title_full | Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior |
title_fullStr | Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior |
title_full_unstemmed | Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior |
title_short | Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior |
title_sort | seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs stable plate interior |
topic | Seismicity modulation Resonance destabilization Plate boundary Stable plate interior |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987122000056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT batakrushnasenapati seismicitymodulationbyexternalstressperturbationsinplateboundaryvsstableplateinterior AT bhaskarkundu seismicitymodulationbyexternalstressperturbationsinplateboundaryvsstableplateinterior AT shuanggenjin seismicitymodulationbyexternalstressperturbationsinplateboundaryvsstableplateinterior |