Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior

Characterization of critically stressed seismogenic fault systems in diverse tectonic settings can be used to explore the stress/frictional condition of faults, along with its sensitivity for seismicity modulation by periodic stress perturbation. However, the process of seismicity modulation in resp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Batakrushna Senapati, Bhaskar Kundu, Shuanggen Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-05-01
Series:Geoscience Frontiers
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987122000056
_version_ 1797712909445365760
author Batakrushna Senapati
Bhaskar Kundu
Shuanggen Jin
author_facet Batakrushna Senapati
Bhaskar Kundu
Shuanggen Jin
author_sort Batakrushna Senapati
collection DOAJ
description Characterization of critically stressed seismogenic fault systems in diverse tectonic settings can be used to explore the stress/frictional condition of faults, along with its sensitivity for seismicity modulation by periodic stress perturbation. However, the process of seismicity modulation in response to external stress perturbation remains debated. In this paper, the characteristic difference in the seismicity modulation due to resonance destabilization phenomenon governed by rate-and-state friction is presented and validated with the globally reported cases of seismicity modulation in diverse tectonic settings. The relatively faster-moving plate boundary regions are equally susceptible for both shorter-period (e.g., semi-diurnal, diurnal, and other small tidal constituents) and long-period (e.g., semi-annual, annual, pole tide and pole wobble) seismicity modulation processes in response to stress perturbations from natural harmonic forcing, including tidal, semi-annual, annual, or multi-annual time scales. In contrast, slowly deforming stable plate interior regions and diffuse deformation zones appear to be more sensitive for long-period seismicity modulation of semi-annual, annual, or even multi-annual time scales but less sensitive for short-period seismicity modulation. This finding is also supported by the theoretical model predictions from the resonance destabilization process and worldwide documented natural observations of seismicity modulation in diverse types of tectonic settings.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T07:28:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e453f6d35fef43c894f0c8705f29a2c3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1674-9871
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T07:28:43Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Geoscience Frontiers
spelling doaj.art-e453f6d35fef43c894f0c8705f29a2c32023-09-02T21:58:43ZengElsevierGeoscience Frontiers1674-98712022-05-01133101352Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interiorBatakrushna Senapati0Bhaskar Kundu1Shuanggen Jin2Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, NIT Rourkela, Rourkela 769008, IndiaDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, NIT Rourkela, Rourkela 769008, India; Corresponding author.Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China; School of Remote Sensing and Geomatics Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaCharacterization of critically stressed seismogenic fault systems in diverse tectonic settings can be used to explore the stress/frictional condition of faults, along with its sensitivity for seismicity modulation by periodic stress perturbation. However, the process of seismicity modulation in response to external stress perturbation remains debated. In this paper, the characteristic difference in the seismicity modulation due to resonance destabilization phenomenon governed by rate-and-state friction is presented and validated with the globally reported cases of seismicity modulation in diverse tectonic settings. The relatively faster-moving plate boundary regions are equally susceptible for both shorter-period (e.g., semi-diurnal, diurnal, and other small tidal constituents) and long-period (e.g., semi-annual, annual, pole tide and pole wobble) seismicity modulation processes in response to stress perturbations from natural harmonic forcing, including tidal, semi-annual, annual, or multi-annual time scales. In contrast, slowly deforming stable plate interior regions and diffuse deformation zones appear to be more sensitive for long-period seismicity modulation of semi-annual, annual, or even multi-annual time scales but less sensitive for short-period seismicity modulation. This finding is also supported by the theoretical model predictions from the resonance destabilization process and worldwide documented natural observations of seismicity modulation in diverse types of tectonic settings.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987122000056Seismicity modulationResonance destabilizationPlate boundaryStable plate interior
spellingShingle Batakrushna Senapati
Bhaskar Kundu
Shuanggen Jin
Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior
Geoscience Frontiers
Seismicity modulation
Resonance destabilization
Plate boundary
Stable plate interior
title Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior
title_full Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior
title_fullStr Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior
title_full_unstemmed Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior
title_short Seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs. stable plate interior
title_sort seismicity modulation by external stress perturbations in plate boundary vs stable plate interior
topic Seismicity modulation
Resonance destabilization
Plate boundary
Stable plate interior
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987122000056
work_keys_str_mv AT batakrushnasenapati seismicitymodulationbyexternalstressperturbationsinplateboundaryvsstableplateinterior
AT bhaskarkundu seismicitymodulationbyexternalstressperturbationsinplateboundaryvsstableplateinterior
AT shuanggenjin seismicitymodulationbyexternalstressperturbationsinplateboundaryvsstableplateinterior