Comparative efficacy of five traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction: Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background: More than half of all heart failure (HF) patients have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). The combination of traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) with Western medicine treatment (WMT) has been reported to have bet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu Zheng, Huizhen Zheng, Zhihua Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-01-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023104026
_version_ 1797337126244712448
author Yu Zheng
Huizhen Zheng
Zhihua Guo
author_facet Yu Zheng
Huizhen Zheng
Zhihua Guo
author_sort Yu Zheng
collection DOAJ
description Background: More than half of all heart failure (HF) patients have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). The combination of traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) with Western medicine treatment (WMT) has been reported to have better efficacy than using WMT alone. However, the positive effects of TCMIs combined with WMT on HFrEF and HFmrEF require more comprehensive and systematic evidence and warrant further investigation. Methods: The NMA searched eight databases, including four English and four Chinese, from database creation to November 10, 2022. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB 2) to assess the selected studies' quality. OpenBUGS and STATA 17.0 were used for network meta-analysis. Results: The 101 RCTs were included in the systematic review. Studies have shown that when combined with any of the five TCMIs, WMT was more efficient than WMT alone. Shenmai injection (SMI) + WMT may be the best treatment for clinical effectiveness rate (CER) improvement and b-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) reduction. Huangqi injection (HQI) + WMT was the best treatment for improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Danhong injection (DHI) + WMT may be the best treatment for lowering left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD). Xinmailong injection (XMLI) + WMT was likely the best treatment for increasing the 6-min walking test (6MWT). In addition, XMLI had the lowest incidence of adverse reactions (3.38%). Conclusions: Shenfu injection (SFI), SMI, DHI, XMLI, and HQI combined with WMT have stronger efficiency in treating HFrEF and HFmrEF. However, as all studies were conducted in China, this review is limited by the inevitable selection bias, and further high-quality multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:04:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e459c696d8ed4b46898ffc721e40ce2c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:04:54Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj.art-e459c696d8ed4b46898ffc721e40ce2c2024-02-01T06:30:59ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402024-01-01101e23194Comparative efficacy of five traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction: Bayesian network meta-analysisYu Zheng0Huizhen Zheng1Zhihua Guo2First Clinical College of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410007, China; College of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, ChinaFirst Clinical College of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410007, China; College of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, ChinaCollege of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China; Corresponding author.Background: More than half of all heart failure (HF) patients have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). The combination of traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) with Western medicine treatment (WMT) has been reported to have better efficacy than using WMT alone. However, the positive effects of TCMIs combined with WMT on HFrEF and HFmrEF require more comprehensive and systematic evidence and warrant further investigation. Methods: The NMA searched eight databases, including four English and four Chinese, from database creation to November 10, 2022. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB 2) to assess the selected studies' quality. OpenBUGS and STATA 17.0 were used for network meta-analysis. Results: The 101 RCTs were included in the systematic review. Studies have shown that when combined with any of the five TCMIs, WMT was more efficient than WMT alone. Shenmai injection (SMI) + WMT may be the best treatment for clinical effectiveness rate (CER) improvement and b-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) reduction. Huangqi injection (HQI) + WMT was the best treatment for improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Danhong injection (DHI) + WMT may be the best treatment for lowering left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD). Xinmailong injection (XMLI) + WMT was likely the best treatment for increasing the 6-min walking test (6MWT). In addition, XMLI had the lowest incidence of adverse reactions (3.38%). Conclusions: Shenfu injection (SFI), SMI, DHI, XMLI, and HQI combined with WMT have stronger efficiency in treating HFrEF and HFmrEF. However, as all studies were conducted in China, this review is limited by the inevitable selection bias, and further high-quality multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023104026Traditional Chinese medicine injectionHeart failure with (mildly) reduced ejection fractionClinical efficacyNetwork meta-analysisBayesian model
spellingShingle Yu Zheng
Huizhen Zheng
Zhihua Guo
Comparative efficacy of five traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction: Bayesian network meta-analysis
Heliyon
Traditional Chinese medicine injection
Heart failure with (mildly) reduced ejection fraction
Clinical efficacy
Network meta-analysis
Bayesian model
title Comparative efficacy of five traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction: Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy of five traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction: Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of five traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction: Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of five traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction: Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy of five traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction: Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy of five traditional chinese medicine injections for treating heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction bayesian network meta analysis
topic Traditional Chinese medicine injection
Heart failure with (mildly) reduced ejection fraction
Clinical efficacy
Network meta-analysis
Bayesian model
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023104026
work_keys_str_mv AT yuzheng comparativeefficacyoffivetraditionalchinesemedicineinjectionsfortreatingheartfailurewithreducedandmildlyreducedejectionfractionbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT huizhenzheng comparativeefficacyoffivetraditionalchinesemedicineinjectionsfortreatingheartfailurewithreducedandmildlyreducedejectionfractionbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhihuaguo comparativeefficacyoffivetraditionalchinesemedicineinjectionsfortreatingheartfailurewithreducedandmildlyreducedejectionfractionbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis