The effects of mechanical force on fibroblast behavior in cutaneous injury

Wound healing results in the formation of scar tissue which can be associated with functional impairment, psychological stress, and significant socioeconomic cost which exceeds 20 billion dollars annually in the United States alone. Pathologic scarring is often associated with exaggerated action of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlotte E. Berry, Mauricio Downer, Annah G. Morgan, Michelle Griffin, Norah E. Liang, Lionel Kameni, Jennifer B. Laufey Parker, Jason Guo, Michael T. Longaker, Derrick C. Wan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1167067/full
_version_ 1797845030107348992
author Charlotte E. Berry
Mauricio Downer
Annah G. Morgan
Michelle Griffin
Norah E. Liang
Lionel Kameni
Jennifer B. Laufey Parker
Jason Guo
Michael T. Longaker
Michael T. Longaker
Derrick C. Wan
author_facet Charlotte E. Berry
Mauricio Downer
Annah G. Morgan
Michelle Griffin
Norah E. Liang
Lionel Kameni
Jennifer B. Laufey Parker
Jason Guo
Michael T. Longaker
Michael T. Longaker
Derrick C. Wan
author_sort Charlotte E. Berry
collection DOAJ
description Wound healing results in the formation of scar tissue which can be associated with functional impairment, psychological stress, and significant socioeconomic cost which exceeds 20 billion dollars annually in the United States alone. Pathologic scarring is often associated with exaggerated action of fibroblasts and subsequent excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins which results in fibrotic thickening of the dermis. In skin wounds, fibroblasts transition to myofibroblasts which contract the wound and contribute to remodeling of the extracellular matrix. Mechanical stress on wounds has long been clinically observed to result in increased pathologic scar formation, and studies over the past decade have begun to uncover the cellular mechanisms that underly this phenomenon. In this article, we will review the investigations which have identified proteins involved in mechano-sensing, such as focal adhesion kinase, as well as other important pathway components that relay the transcriptional effects of mechanical forces, such as RhoA/ROCK, the hippo pathway, YAP/TAZ, and Piezo1. Additionally, we will discuss findings in animal models which show the inhibition of these pathways to promote wound healing, reduce contracture, mitigate scar formation, and restore normal extracellular matrix architecture. Recent advances in single cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics and the resulting ability to further characterize mechanoresponsive fibroblast subpopulations and the genes that define them will be summarized. Given the importance of mechanical signaling in scar formation, several clinical treatments focused on reducing tension on the wound have been developed and are described here. Finally, we will look toward future research which may reveal novel cellular pathways and deepen our understanding of the pathogenesis of pathologic scarring. The past decade of scientific inquiry has drawn many lines connecting these cellular mechanisms that may lead to a map for the development of transitional treatments for patients on the path to scarless healing.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:31:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e462ed156463422591a9e3343543040d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-875X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:31:57Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Surgery
spelling doaj.art-e462ed156463422591a9e3343543040d2023-04-18T04:58:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2023-04-011010.3389/fsurg.2023.11670671167067The effects of mechanical force on fibroblast behavior in cutaneous injuryCharlotte E. Berry0Mauricio Downer1Annah G. Morgan2Michelle Griffin3Norah E. Liang4Lionel Kameni5Jennifer B. Laufey Parker6Jason Guo7Michael T. Longaker8Michael T. Longaker9Derrick C. Wan10Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United StatesHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United StatesWound healing results in the formation of scar tissue which can be associated with functional impairment, psychological stress, and significant socioeconomic cost which exceeds 20 billion dollars annually in the United States alone. Pathologic scarring is often associated with exaggerated action of fibroblasts and subsequent excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins which results in fibrotic thickening of the dermis. In skin wounds, fibroblasts transition to myofibroblasts which contract the wound and contribute to remodeling of the extracellular matrix. Mechanical stress on wounds has long been clinically observed to result in increased pathologic scar formation, and studies over the past decade have begun to uncover the cellular mechanisms that underly this phenomenon. In this article, we will review the investigations which have identified proteins involved in mechano-sensing, such as focal adhesion kinase, as well as other important pathway components that relay the transcriptional effects of mechanical forces, such as RhoA/ROCK, the hippo pathway, YAP/TAZ, and Piezo1. Additionally, we will discuss findings in animal models which show the inhibition of these pathways to promote wound healing, reduce contracture, mitigate scar formation, and restore normal extracellular matrix architecture. Recent advances in single cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics and the resulting ability to further characterize mechanoresponsive fibroblast subpopulations and the genes that define them will be summarized. Given the importance of mechanical signaling in scar formation, several clinical treatments focused on reducing tension on the wound have been developed and are described here. Finally, we will look toward future research which may reveal novel cellular pathways and deepen our understanding of the pathogenesis of pathologic scarring. The past decade of scientific inquiry has drawn many lines connecting these cellular mechanisms that may lead to a map for the development of transitional treatments for patients on the path to scarless healing.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1167067/fullmechanical forcefibroblastmyofibroblastscarreview
spellingShingle Charlotte E. Berry
Mauricio Downer
Annah G. Morgan
Michelle Griffin
Norah E. Liang
Lionel Kameni
Jennifer B. Laufey Parker
Jason Guo
Michael T. Longaker
Michael T. Longaker
Derrick C. Wan
The effects of mechanical force on fibroblast behavior in cutaneous injury
Frontiers in Surgery
mechanical force
fibroblast
myofibroblast
scar
review
title The effects of mechanical force on fibroblast behavior in cutaneous injury
title_full The effects of mechanical force on fibroblast behavior in cutaneous injury
title_fullStr The effects of mechanical force on fibroblast behavior in cutaneous injury
title_full_unstemmed The effects of mechanical force on fibroblast behavior in cutaneous injury
title_short The effects of mechanical force on fibroblast behavior in cutaneous injury
title_sort effects of mechanical force on fibroblast behavior in cutaneous injury
topic mechanical force
fibroblast
myofibroblast
scar
review
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1167067/full
work_keys_str_mv AT charlotteeberry theeffectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT mauriciodowner theeffectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT annahgmorgan theeffectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT michellegriffin theeffectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT noraheliang theeffectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT lionelkameni theeffectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT jenniferblaufeyparker theeffectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT jasonguo theeffectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT michaeltlongaker theeffectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT michaeltlongaker theeffectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT derrickcwan theeffectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT charlotteeberry effectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT mauriciodowner effectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT annahgmorgan effectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT michellegriffin effectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT noraheliang effectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT lionelkameni effectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT jenniferblaufeyparker effectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT jasonguo effectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT michaeltlongaker effectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT michaeltlongaker effectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury
AT derrickcwan effectsofmechanicalforceonfibroblastbehaviorincutaneousinjury