Revisiting the Logical Problem of Evil and Swinburne’s Greater Goods Theodicy

The problem of evil is challenging the belief in the omniscient, omnipotent, and wholly good God. In its logical sense and deductive form, it claims that there are some pointless evils and myriads of life disorderliness with the existence of which God’s existence and his positive attributions are in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tavakkol Kouhi Giglou, Javad Danesh
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Imam Sadiq University 2015-04-01
Series:پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین
Subjects:
Online Access:https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1638_23895e7e987a2a6abd97d3dc3044cdfe.pdf
_version_ 1827325399300833280
author Tavakkol Kouhi Giglou
Javad Danesh
author_facet Tavakkol Kouhi Giglou
Javad Danesh
author_sort Tavakkol Kouhi Giglou
collection DOAJ
description The problem of evil is challenging the belief in the omniscient, omnipotent, and wholly good God. In its logical sense and deductive form, it claims that there are some pointless evils and myriads of life disorderliness with the existence of which God’s existence and his positive attributions are inconsistent. Needless to say, the reliability of this argument is based on the trueness or at least probable trueness of the concrete statement. Nevertheless, some philosophers like Swinburne have tried to deny the statement by the answers such as Greater goods theodicy. This article tries to look closely at atheists' logical argument and their alleged concrete statements, and then examine the Swinburne’s defense and its difficulties.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:26:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e46666bee2de4e4e8ea995c01b963b36
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2228-6578
2228-6586
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:26:39Z
publishDate 2015-04-01
publisher Imam Sadiq University
record_format Article
series پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین
spelling doaj.art-e46666bee2de4e4e8ea995c01b963b362024-03-06T08:03:02ZfasImam Sadiq Universityپژوهشنامه فلسفه دین2228-65782228-65862015-04-0113114916410.30497/prr.2015.16381638Revisiting the Logical Problem of Evil and Swinburne’s Greater Goods TheodicyTavakkol Kouhi Giglou0Javad Danesh1Faculty Member at the Department of Islamic Studies, Islamic Azad University, Ahar Branch, Ahar, IranFaculty Member of Islamic Science and Culture Academy, Qom, IranThe problem of evil is challenging the belief in the omniscient, omnipotent, and wholly good God. In its logical sense and deductive form, it claims that there are some pointless evils and myriads of life disorderliness with the existence of which God’s existence and his positive attributions are inconsistent. Needless to say, the reliability of this argument is based on the trueness or at least probable trueness of the concrete statement. Nevertheless, some philosophers like Swinburne have tried to deny the statement by the answers such as Greater goods theodicy. This article tries to look closely at atheists' logical argument and their alleged concrete statements, and then examine the Swinburne’s defense and its difficulties.https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1638_23895e7e987a2a6abd97d3dc3044cdfe.pdflogical problem of eviladjunctive propositionthe principle of credulitygreater goods
spellingShingle Tavakkol Kouhi Giglou
Javad Danesh
Revisiting the Logical Problem of Evil and Swinburne’s Greater Goods Theodicy
پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین
logical problem of evil
adjunctive proposition
the principle of credulity
greater goods
title Revisiting the Logical Problem of Evil and Swinburne’s Greater Goods Theodicy
title_full Revisiting the Logical Problem of Evil and Swinburne’s Greater Goods Theodicy
title_fullStr Revisiting the Logical Problem of Evil and Swinburne’s Greater Goods Theodicy
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the Logical Problem of Evil and Swinburne’s Greater Goods Theodicy
title_short Revisiting the Logical Problem of Evil and Swinburne’s Greater Goods Theodicy
title_sort revisiting the logical problem of evil and swinburne s greater goods theodicy
topic logical problem of evil
adjunctive proposition
the principle of credulity
greater goods
url https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1638_23895e7e987a2a6abd97d3dc3044cdfe.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tavakkolkouhigiglou revisitingthelogicalproblemofevilandswinburnesgreatergoodstheodicy
AT javaddanesh revisitingthelogicalproblemofevilandswinburnesgreatergoodstheodicy