Evaluation of Snowmelt Estimation Techniques for Enhanced Spring Peak Flow Prediction

Water resources management and planning requires accurate and reliable spring flood forecasts. In cold and snowy countries, particularly in snow-dominated watersheds, enhanced flood prediction requires adequate snowmelt estimation techniques. Whereas the majority of the studies on snow modeling have...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jetal Agnihotri, Paulin Coulibaly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/5/1290
_version_ 1797569083955216384
author Jetal Agnihotri
Paulin Coulibaly
author_facet Jetal Agnihotri
Paulin Coulibaly
author_sort Jetal Agnihotri
collection DOAJ
description Water resources management and planning requires accurate and reliable spring flood forecasts. In cold and snowy countries, particularly in snow-dominated watersheds, enhanced flood prediction requires adequate snowmelt estimation techniques. Whereas the majority of the studies on snow modeling have focused on comparing the performance of empirical techniques and physically based methods, very few studies have investigated empirical models and conceptual models for improving spring peak flow prediction. The objective of this study is to investigate the potential of empirical degree-day method (DDM) to effectively and accurately predict peak flows compared to sophisticated and conceptual SNOW-17 model at two watersheds in Canada: the La-Grande River Basin (LGRB) and the Upper Assiniboine river at Shellmouth Reservoir (UASR). Additional insightful contributions include the evaluation of a seasonal model calibration approach, an annual model calibration method, and two hydrological models: McMaster University Hydrologiska Byrans Vattenbalansavdelning (MAC-HBV) and Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting model (SAC-SMA). A total of eight model scenarios were considered for each watershed. Results indicate that DDM was very competitive with SNOW-17 at both the study sites, whereas it showed significant improvement in prediction accuracy at UASR. Moreover, the seasonally calibrated model appears to be an effective alternative to an annual model calibration approach, while the SAC-SMA model outperformed the MAC-HBV model, no matter which snowmelt computation method, calibration approach, or study basin is used. Conclusively, the DDM and seasonal model calibration approach coupled with the SAC-SMA hydrologic model appears to be a robust model combination for spring peak flow estimation.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:05:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e4675e978164489282bdb339d281b8c1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:05:58Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-e4675e978164489282bdb339d281b8c12023-11-19T23:17:16ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-05-01125129010.3390/w12051290Evaluation of Snowmelt Estimation Techniques for Enhanced Spring Peak Flow PredictionJetal Agnihotri0Paulin Coulibaly1School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, CanadaSchool of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, CanadaWater resources management and planning requires accurate and reliable spring flood forecasts. In cold and snowy countries, particularly in snow-dominated watersheds, enhanced flood prediction requires adequate snowmelt estimation techniques. Whereas the majority of the studies on snow modeling have focused on comparing the performance of empirical techniques and physically based methods, very few studies have investigated empirical models and conceptual models for improving spring peak flow prediction. The objective of this study is to investigate the potential of empirical degree-day method (DDM) to effectively and accurately predict peak flows compared to sophisticated and conceptual SNOW-17 model at two watersheds in Canada: the La-Grande River Basin (LGRB) and the Upper Assiniboine river at Shellmouth Reservoir (UASR). Additional insightful contributions include the evaluation of a seasonal model calibration approach, an annual model calibration method, and two hydrological models: McMaster University Hydrologiska Byrans Vattenbalansavdelning (MAC-HBV) and Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting model (SAC-SMA). A total of eight model scenarios were considered for each watershed. Results indicate that DDM was very competitive with SNOW-17 at both the study sites, whereas it showed significant improvement in prediction accuracy at UASR. Moreover, the seasonally calibrated model appears to be an effective alternative to an annual model calibration approach, while the SAC-SMA model outperformed the MAC-HBV model, no matter which snowmelt computation method, calibration approach, or study basin is used. Conclusively, the DDM and seasonal model calibration approach coupled with the SAC-SMA hydrologic model appears to be a robust model combination for spring peak flow estimation.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/5/1290hydrological modelsspring peak flow predictionsnowmelt estimationcalibration approachesreservoir inflow
spellingShingle Jetal Agnihotri
Paulin Coulibaly
Evaluation of Snowmelt Estimation Techniques for Enhanced Spring Peak Flow Prediction
Water
hydrological models
spring peak flow prediction
snowmelt estimation
calibration approaches
reservoir inflow
title Evaluation of Snowmelt Estimation Techniques for Enhanced Spring Peak Flow Prediction
title_full Evaluation of Snowmelt Estimation Techniques for Enhanced Spring Peak Flow Prediction
title_fullStr Evaluation of Snowmelt Estimation Techniques for Enhanced Spring Peak Flow Prediction
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Snowmelt Estimation Techniques for Enhanced Spring Peak Flow Prediction
title_short Evaluation of Snowmelt Estimation Techniques for Enhanced Spring Peak Flow Prediction
title_sort evaluation of snowmelt estimation techniques for enhanced spring peak flow prediction
topic hydrological models
spring peak flow prediction
snowmelt estimation
calibration approaches
reservoir inflow
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/5/1290
work_keys_str_mv AT jetalagnihotri evaluationofsnowmeltestimationtechniquesforenhancedspringpeakflowprediction
AT paulincoulibaly evaluationofsnowmeltestimationtechniquesforenhancedspringpeakflowprediction