Comparison between Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Implants in Immediate-Loading Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Multi-Center 1-Year Follow-Up Study
The objective of the present retrospective multi-center study was to analyze the outcomes of bone-level (BL) implants and tissue-level (TL) implants in immediate-loading full-arch rehabilitations. Patients who were previously rehabilitated with full-arch immediate-loading rehabilitations with either...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | Prosthesis |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-1592/5/4/89 |
| _version_ | 1797379601896308736 |
|---|---|
| author | Francesco Pera Massimo Carossa Francesco Bagnasco Armando Crupi Giulia Ambrogio Gaetano Isola Maria Menini Paolo Pesce |
| author_facet | Francesco Pera Massimo Carossa Francesco Bagnasco Armando Crupi Giulia Ambrogio Gaetano Isola Maria Menini Paolo Pesce |
| author_sort | Francesco Pera |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The objective of the present retrospective multi-center study was to analyze the outcomes of bone-level (BL) implants and tissue-level (TL) implants in immediate-loading full-arch rehabilitations. Patients who were previously rehabilitated with full-arch immediate-loading rehabilitations with either BL or TL implants were considered. Data regarding implant survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), peri-implant probing depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded, and the 1-year follow-up data were statistically analyzed between the two groups. In total, 38 patients were evaluated for a total implant number of 156 (n = 80 TL implants and n = 76 BL implants). An implant survival rate of 97.37% was recoded for the BL group while an implant survival rate of 100% was noted for the TL group. A total MBL of 1.324 ± 0.64 mm was recorded for BL implants, while a total MBL of 1.194 ± 0.30 mm was recorded for TL implants. A statistically significant difference was highlighted regarding MBL at the mesial aspect (<i>p</i> = 0.01552) of the implants, with BL implants presenting with higher MBL. Within the range of acceptable healthy values, a statistically significant difference was also highlighted regarding BOP (<i>p</i> < 0.00001), with TL implants presenting higher values. No statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05) was recorded for any of the other variables analyzed. Within the limitations of the present retrospective study, both TL and BL implants seem to provide good clinical outcomes after a 12-month observational period when employed in immediate-loading full-arch rehabilitation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T20:25:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e468ccfcab33479380e8c13195d94360 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2673-1592 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T20:25:30Z |
| publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Prosthesis |
| spelling | doaj.art-e468ccfcab33479380e8c13195d943602023-12-22T14:37:54ZengMDPI AGProsthesis2673-15922023-11-01541301131110.3390/prosthesis5040089Comparison between Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Implants in Immediate-Loading Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Multi-Center 1-Year Follow-Up StudyFrancesco Pera0Massimo Carossa1Francesco Bagnasco2Armando Crupi3Giulia Ambrogio4Gaetano Isola5Maria Menini6Paolo Pesce7Department of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, ItalyDepartment of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, ItalyDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, ItalyDepartment of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, ItalyUnit of Periodontology, Department of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, ItalyDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, ItalyThe objective of the present retrospective multi-center study was to analyze the outcomes of bone-level (BL) implants and tissue-level (TL) implants in immediate-loading full-arch rehabilitations. Patients who were previously rehabilitated with full-arch immediate-loading rehabilitations with either BL or TL implants were considered. Data regarding implant survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), peri-implant probing depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded, and the 1-year follow-up data were statistically analyzed between the two groups. In total, 38 patients were evaluated for a total implant number of 156 (n = 80 TL implants and n = 76 BL implants). An implant survival rate of 97.37% was recoded for the BL group while an implant survival rate of 100% was noted for the TL group. A total MBL of 1.324 ± 0.64 mm was recorded for BL implants, while a total MBL of 1.194 ± 0.30 mm was recorded for TL implants. A statistically significant difference was highlighted regarding MBL at the mesial aspect (<i>p</i> = 0.01552) of the implants, with BL implants presenting with higher MBL. Within the range of acceptable healthy values, a statistically significant difference was also highlighted regarding BOP (<i>p</i> < 0.00001), with TL implants presenting higher values. No statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05) was recorded for any of the other variables analyzed. Within the limitations of the present retrospective study, both TL and BL implants seem to provide good clinical outcomes after a 12-month observational period when employed in immediate-loading full-arch rehabilitation.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-1592/5/4/89dental implantsimmediate loadingfull-archbone-leveltissue-levelabutments |
| spellingShingle | Francesco Pera Massimo Carossa Francesco Bagnasco Armando Crupi Giulia Ambrogio Gaetano Isola Maria Menini Paolo Pesce Comparison between Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Implants in Immediate-Loading Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Multi-Center 1-Year Follow-Up Study Prosthesis dental implants immediate loading full-arch bone-level tissue-level abutments |
| title | Comparison between Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Implants in Immediate-Loading Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Multi-Center 1-Year Follow-Up Study |
| title_full | Comparison between Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Implants in Immediate-Loading Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Multi-Center 1-Year Follow-Up Study |
| title_fullStr | Comparison between Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Implants in Immediate-Loading Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Multi-Center 1-Year Follow-Up Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Implants in Immediate-Loading Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Multi-Center 1-Year Follow-Up Study |
| title_short | Comparison between Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Implants in Immediate-Loading Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Multi-Center 1-Year Follow-Up Study |
| title_sort | comparison between bone level and tissue level implants in immediate loading full arch rehabilitations a retrospective multi center 1 year follow up study |
| topic | dental implants immediate loading full-arch bone-level tissue-level abutments |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-1592/5/4/89 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT francescopera comparisonbetweenbonelevelandtissuelevelimplantsinimmediateloadingfullarchrehabilitationsaretrospectivemulticenter1yearfollowupstudy AT massimocarossa comparisonbetweenbonelevelandtissuelevelimplantsinimmediateloadingfullarchrehabilitationsaretrospectivemulticenter1yearfollowupstudy AT francescobagnasco comparisonbetweenbonelevelandtissuelevelimplantsinimmediateloadingfullarchrehabilitationsaretrospectivemulticenter1yearfollowupstudy AT armandocrupi comparisonbetweenbonelevelandtissuelevelimplantsinimmediateloadingfullarchrehabilitationsaretrospectivemulticenter1yearfollowupstudy AT giuliaambrogio comparisonbetweenbonelevelandtissuelevelimplantsinimmediateloadingfullarchrehabilitationsaretrospectivemulticenter1yearfollowupstudy AT gaetanoisola comparisonbetweenbonelevelandtissuelevelimplantsinimmediateloadingfullarchrehabilitationsaretrospectivemulticenter1yearfollowupstudy AT mariamenini comparisonbetweenbonelevelandtissuelevelimplantsinimmediateloadingfullarchrehabilitationsaretrospectivemulticenter1yearfollowupstudy AT paolopesce comparisonbetweenbonelevelandtissuelevelimplantsinimmediateloadingfullarchrehabilitationsaretrospectivemulticenter1yearfollowupstudy |