Sodium Alginate as a Potential Therapeutic Filler: An In Vivo Study in Rats

Filler injection demand is increasing worldwide, but no ideal filler with safety and longevity currently exists. Sodium alginate (SA) is the sodium salt of alginic acid, which is a polymeric polysaccharide obtained by linear polymerization of two types of uronic acid, <span style="font-varia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masanori Mori, Rintaro Asahi, Yoshihiro Yamamoto, Takanobu Mashiko, Kayo Yoshizumi, Natsumi Saito, Takako Shirado, Yunyan Wu, Kotaro Yoshimura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Marine Drugs
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/18/10/520
Description
Summary:Filler injection demand is increasing worldwide, but no ideal filler with safety and longevity currently exists. Sodium alginate (SA) is the sodium salt of alginic acid, which is a polymeric polysaccharide obtained by linear polymerization of two types of uronic acid, <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">d</span>-mannuronic acid (M) and <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">l</span>-guluronic acid (G). This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic value of SA. Nine SA types with different M/G ratios and viscosities were tested and compared with a commercially available sodium hyaluronate (SH) filler. Three injection modes (onto the periosteum, intradermally, or subcutaneously) were used in six rats for each substance, and the animals were sacrificed at 4 or 24 weeks. Changes in the diameter and volume were measured macroscopically and by computed tomography, and histopathological evaluations were performed. SA with a low M/G ratio generally maintained skin uplift. The bulge gradually decreased over time but slightly increased at 4 weeks in some samples. No capsule formation was observed around SA. However, granulomatous reactions, including macrophage recruitment, were observed 4 weeks after SA implantation, although fewer macrophages and granulomatous reactions were observed at 24 weeks. The long-term volumizing effects and degree of granulomatous reactions differed depending on the M/G ratio and viscosity. By contrast, SH showed capsule formation but with minimal granulomatous reactions. The beneficial and adverse effects of SA as a filler differed according to the viscosity or M/G ratio, suggesting a better long-term volumizing effect than SH with relatively low immunogenicity
ISSN:1660-3397