The Effects of Display Parameters and Devices on Spatial Ability Test Times

The effects of display parameters and devices are examined on spatial ability test times in virtual environments. Before the investigation, completion times of 240 and 61 students were measured, using an LG desktop display and the Gear VR, respectively. The virtual environment also logged the follow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tibor Guzsvinecz, Éva Orbán-Mihálykó, Cecília Sik-Lányi, Erika Perge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/3/1312
_version_ 1797489230809661440
author Tibor Guzsvinecz
Éva Orbán-Mihálykó
Cecília Sik-Lányi
Erika Perge
author_facet Tibor Guzsvinecz
Éva Orbán-Mihálykó
Cecília Sik-Lányi
Erika Perge
author_sort Tibor Guzsvinecz
collection DOAJ
description The effects of display parameters and devices are examined on spatial ability test times in virtual environments. Before the investigation, completion times of 240 and 61 students were measured, using an LG desktop display and the Gear VR, respectively. The virtual environment also logged the following randomized display parameters: virtual camera type, field of view, rotation, contrast ratio, whether shadows are turned on, and the used display device. The completion times were analyzed using regression analysis methods. Except for the virtual camera type, every factor has a significant influence on the test completion times. After grouping the remaining factors into pairs, triplets, quartets, and quintets, the following can be concluded: the combination of 75° field of view, 45° camera rotation, and 3:1 contrast ratio has the largest increase in completion times with an estimate of 420.88 s—even when this combination is in-side a quartet or a quintet. Consequently, significant decreases in completion times exist up to variable quartets (the largest being −106.29 s on average), however, the significance disappears among variable quintets. The occurrences of factors were also investigated: an undefined field of view, a 0° camera rotation, the Gear VR, a 7:1 contrast ratio, and turned-on shadows are the factors that occur in most significant combinations. These are the factors that often and significantly influence completion times.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:14:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e47b16c9d13f4d0e967da5f7dff76569
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:14:29Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-e47b16c9d13f4d0e967da5f7dff765692023-11-23T15:55:30ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172022-01-01123131210.3390/app12031312The Effects of Display Parameters and Devices on Spatial Ability Test TimesTibor Guzsvinecz0Éva Orbán-Mihálykó1Cecília Sik-Lányi2Erika Perge3Department of Information Technology and Its Applications, University of Pannonia, 8900 Zalaegerszeg, HungaryDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pannonia, 8200 Veszprem, HungaryDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems, University of Pannonia, 8200 Veszprem, HungaryDepartment of Basic Technical Studies, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, HungaryThe effects of display parameters and devices are examined on spatial ability test times in virtual environments. Before the investigation, completion times of 240 and 61 students were measured, using an LG desktop display and the Gear VR, respectively. The virtual environment also logged the following randomized display parameters: virtual camera type, field of view, rotation, contrast ratio, whether shadows are turned on, and the used display device. The completion times were analyzed using regression analysis methods. Except for the virtual camera type, every factor has a significant influence on the test completion times. After grouping the remaining factors into pairs, triplets, quartets, and quintets, the following can be concluded: the combination of 75° field of view, 45° camera rotation, and 3:1 contrast ratio has the largest increase in completion times with an estimate of 420.88 s—even when this combination is in-side a quartet or a quintet. Consequently, significant decreases in completion times exist up to variable quartets (the largest being −106.29 s on average), however, the significance disappears among variable quintets. The occurrences of factors were also investigated: an undefined field of view, a 0° camera rotation, the Gear VR, a 7:1 contrast ratio, and turned-on shadows are the factors that occur in most significant combinations. These are the factors that often and significantly influence completion times.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/3/1312cognitive skillsdesktop displayGear VRhuman-computer interactionmental rotationspatial ability
spellingShingle Tibor Guzsvinecz
Éva Orbán-Mihálykó
Cecília Sik-Lányi
Erika Perge
The Effects of Display Parameters and Devices on Spatial Ability Test Times
Applied Sciences
cognitive skills
desktop display
Gear VR
human-computer interaction
mental rotation
spatial ability
title The Effects of Display Parameters and Devices on Spatial Ability Test Times
title_full The Effects of Display Parameters and Devices on Spatial Ability Test Times
title_fullStr The Effects of Display Parameters and Devices on Spatial Ability Test Times
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Display Parameters and Devices on Spatial Ability Test Times
title_short The Effects of Display Parameters and Devices on Spatial Ability Test Times
title_sort effects of display parameters and devices on spatial ability test times
topic cognitive skills
desktop display
Gear VR
human-computer interaction
mental rotation
spatial ability
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/3/1312
work_keys_str_mv AT tiborguzsvinecz theeffectsofdisplayparametersanddevicesonspatialabilitytesttimes
AT evaorbanmihalyko theeffectsofdisplayparametersanddevicesonspatialabilitytesttimes
AT ceciliasiklanyi theeffectsofdisplayparametersanddevicesonspatialabilitytesttimes
AT erikaperge theeffectsofdisplayparametersanddevicesonspatialabilitytesttimes
AT tiborguzsvinecz effectsofdisplayparametersanddevicesonspatialabilitytesttimes
AT evaorbanmihalyko effectsofdisplayparametersanddevicesonspatialabilitytesttimes
AT ceciliasiklanyi effectsofdisplayparametersanddevicesonspatialabilitytesttimes
AT erikaperge effectsofdisplayparametersanddevicesonspatialabilitytesttimes