Firm Characteristics, Business Environment, Strategic Orientation, and Performance

The purpose of this study is to empirically examine the influence of firm characteristics (size, age, industry type, and ownership) on a firm’s strategic orientation. The business environment, namely market uncertainty and competition intensity, is also analysed in association with the firm’s strate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sofik Handoyo, Sri Mulyani, Erlane K. Ghani, Slamet Soedarsono
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Administrative Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/3/74
_version_ 1797614173629186048
author Sofik Handoyo
Sri Mulyani
Erlane K. Ghani
Slamet Soedarsono
author_facet Sofik Handoyo
Sri Mulyani
Erlane K. Ghani
Slamet Soedarsono
author_sort Sofik Handoyo
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study is to empirically examine the influence of firm characteristics (size, age, industry type, and ownership) on a firm’s strategic orientation. The business environment, namely market uncertainty and competition intensity, is also analysed in association with the firm’s strategic orientation. Furthermore, the implication of strategic orientation for performance is tested. The study used 1024 data sets of 128 manufacturing firms listed on the Indonesia stock exchange from 2014 to 2021. Data panel regression and independent t-tests were employed for statistical analysis. Adopting Miles and Snow’s strategy typology framework, the findings indicated that the firm size, industry type, and competition intensity significantly influence the firm’s strategic orientation. Small firms preferred to adopt a proactive strategic orientation (prospector and analyser). Firms in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) industry tended to adopt a proactive strategic orientation (prospector and analyser). Strategic orientation was found to positively and significantly influence firm performance. Firms that adopt a proactive strategic orientation (analyser and prospector) showed better performance than defensive ones (reactor and defender).
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:06:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e494b4b3d14e4480ae7e5c794e30bf9d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3387
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:06:03Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Administrative Sciences
spelling doaj.art-e494b4b3d14e4480ae7e5c794e30bf9d2023-11-17T08:57:18ZengMDPI AGAdministrative Sciences2076-33872023-03-011337410.3390/admsci13030074Firm Characteristics, Business Environment, Strategic Orientation, and PerformanceSofik Handoyo0Sri Mulyani1Erlane K. Ghani2Slamet Soedarsono3Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40113, IndonesiaFaculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40113, IndonesiaFaculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam 42300, Selangor, MalaysiaIndonesia Ministry of National Development Planning, Jakarta 10310, IndonesiaThe purpose of this study is to empirically examine the influence of firm characteristics (size, age, industry type, and ownership) on a firm’s strategic orientation. The business environment, namely market uncertainty and competition intensity, is also analysed in association with the firm’s strategic orientation. Furthermore, the implication of strategic orientation for performance is tested. The study used 1024 data sets of 128 manufacturing firms listed on the Indonesia stock exchange from 2014 to 2021. Data panel regression and independent t-tests were employed for statistical analysis. Adopting Miles and Snow’s strategy typology framework, the findings indicated that the firm size, industry type, and competition intensity significantly influence the firm’s strategic orientation. Small firms preferred to adopt a proactive strategic orientation (prospector and analyser). Firms in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) industry tended to adopt a proactive strategic orientation (prospector and analyser). Strategic orientation was found to positively and significantly influence firm performance. Firms that adopt a proactive strategic orientation (analyser and prospector) showed better performance than defensive ones (reactor and defender).https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/3/74firm characteristicsbusiness environmentstrategic orientationperformancemanufacturing
spellingShingle Sofik Handoyo
Sri Mulyani
Erlane K. Ghani
Slamet Soedarsono
Firm Characteristics, Business Environment, Strategic Orientation, and Performance
Administrative Sciences
firm characteristics
business environment
strategic orientation
performance
manufacturing
title Firm Characteristics, Business Environment, Strategic Orientation, and Performance
title_full Firm Characteristics, Business Environment, Strategic Orientation, and Performance
title_fullStr Firm Characteristics, Business Environment, Strategic Orientation, and Performance
title_full_unstemmed Firm Characteristics, Business Environment, Strategic Orientation, and Performance
title_short Firm Characteristics, Business Environment, Strategic Orientation, and Performance
title_sort firm characteristics business environment strategic orientation and performance
topic firm characteristics
business environment
strategic orientation
performance
manufacturing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/3/74
work_keys_str_mv AT sofikhandoyo firmcharacteristicsbusinessenvironmentstrategicorientationandperformance
AT srimulyani firmcharacteristicsbusinessenvironmentstrategicorientationandperformance
AT erlanekghani firmcharacteristicsbusinessenvironmentstrategicorientationandperformance
AT slametsoedarsono firmcharacteristicsbusinessenvironmentstrategicorientationandperformance