Implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings: A multi-method study using normalisation process theory.
<h4>Purpose</h4>To examine the use of Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to establish if, and in what ways, the AMBER care bundle can be successfully normalised into acute hospital practice, and to identify necessary modifications to optimise its implementation.<h4>Method</h4>...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239181 |
_version_ | 1818919567313862656 |
---|---|
author | Halle Johnson Emel Yorganci Catherine J Evans Stephen Barclay Fliss E M Murtagh Deokhee Yi Wei Gao Elizabeth L Sampson Joanne Droney Morag Farquhar Jonathan Koffman |
author_facet | Halle Johnson Emel Yorganci Catherine J Evans Stephen Barclay Fliss E M Murtagh Deokhee Yi Wei Gao Elizabeth L Sampson Joanne Droney Morag Farquhar Jonathan Koffman |
author_sort | Halle Johnson |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <h4>Purpose</h4>To examine the use of Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to establish if, and in what ways, the AMBER care bundle can be successfully normalised into acute hospital practice, and to identify necessary modifications to optimise its implementation.<h4>Method</h4>Multi-method process evaluation embedded within a mixed-method feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial in two district general hospitals in England. Data were collected using (i) focus groups with health professionals (HPs), (ii) semi-structured interviews with patients and/or carers, (iii) non-participant observations of multi-disciplinary team meetings and (iv) patient clinical note review. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics, with interpretation guided by NPT components (coherence; cognitive participation; collective action; reflexive monitoring). Data triangulated across sources.<h4>Results</h4>Two focus groups (26 HPs), nine non-participant observations, 12 interviews (two patients, 10 relatives), 29 clinical note reviews were conducted. While coherence was evident, with HPs recognising the value of the AMBER care bundle, cognitive participation and collective action presented challenges. Specifically: (1) HPs were unable and unwilling to operationalise the concept of 'risk of dying' intervention eligibility criteria (2) integration relied on a 'champion' to drive participation and ensure sustainability; and (3) differing skills and confidence led to variable engagement with difficult conversations with patients and families about, for example, nearness to end of life. Opportunities for reflexive monitoring were not routinely embedded within the intervention. Reflections on the use of the AMBER care bundle from HPs and patients and families, including recommended modifications became evident through this NPT-driven analysis.<h4>Conclusion</h4>To be successfully normalised, new clinical practices, such as the AMBER care bundle, must be studied within the wider context in which they operate. NPT can be used to the aid identification of practical strategies to assist in normalisation of complex interventions where the focus of care is on clinical uncertainty in acute hospital settings. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T01:07:54Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e498bfb040684734ba6c4f321264e08f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T01:07:54Z |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-e498bfb040684734ba6c4f321264e08f2022-12-21T19:58:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159e023918110.1371/journal.pone.0239181Implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings: A multi-method study using normalisation process theory.Halle JohnsonEmel YorganciCatherine J EvansStephen BarclayFliss E M MurtaghDeokhee YiWei GaoElizabeth L SampsonJoanne DroneyMorag FarquharJonathan Koffman<h4>Purpose</h4>To examine the use of Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to establish if, and in what ways, the AMBER care bundle can be successfully normalised into acute hospital practice, and to identify necessary modifications to optimise its implementation.<h4>Method</h4>Multi-method process evaluation embedded within a mixed-method feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial in two district general hospitals in England. Data were collected using (i) focus groups with health professionals (HPs), (ii) semi-structured interviews with patients and/or carers, (iii) non-participant observations of multi-disciplinary team meetings and (iv) patient clinical note review. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics, with interpretation guided by NPT components (coherence; cognitive participation; collective action; reflexive monitoring). Data triangulated across sources.<h4>Results</h4>Two focus groups (26 HPs), nine non-participant observations, 12 interviews (two patients, 10 relatives), 29 clinical note reviews were conducted. While coherence was evident, with HPs recognising the value of the AMBER care bundle, cognitive participation and collective action presented challenges. Specifically: (1) HPs were unable and unwilling to operationalise the concept of 'risk of dying' intervention eligibility criteria (2) integration relied on a 'champion' to drive participation and ensure sustainability; and (3) differing skills and confidence led to variable engagement with difficult conversations with patients and families about, for example, nearness to end of life. Opportunities for reflexive monitoring were not routinely embedded within the intervention. Reflections on the use of the AMBER care bundle from HPs and patients and families, including recommended modifications became evident through this NPT-driven analysis.<h4>Conclusion</h4>To be successfully normalised, new clinical practices, such as the AMBER care bundle, must be studied within the wider context in which they operate. NPT can be used to the aid identification of practical strategies to assist in normalisation of complex interventions where the focus of care is on clinical uncertainty in acute hospital settings.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239181 |
spellingShingle | Halle Johnson Emel Yorganci Catherine J Evans Stephen Barclay Fliss E M Murtagh Deokhee Yi Wei Gao Elizabeth L Sampson Joanne Droney Morag Farquhar Jonathan Koffman Implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings: A multi-method study using normalisation process theory. PLoS ONE |
title | Implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings: A multi-method study using normalisation process theory. |
title_full | Implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings: A multi-method study using normalisation process theory. |
title_fullStr | Implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings: A multi-method study using normalisation process theory. |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings: A multi-method study using normalisation process theory. |
title_short | Implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings: A multi-method study using normalisation process theory. |
title_sort | implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings a multi method study using normalisation process theory |
url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239181 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hallejohnson implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovecareforpatientswhosesituationsareclinicallyuncertaininhospitalsettingsamultimethodstudyusingnormalisationprocesstheory AT emelyorganci implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovecareforpatientswhosesituationsareclinicallyuncertaininhospitalsettingsamultimethodstudyusingnormalisationprocesstheory AT catherinejevans implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovecareforpatientswhosesituationsareclinicallyuncertaininhospitalsettingsamultimethodstudyusingnormalisationprocesstheory AT stephenbarclay implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovecareforpatientswhosesituationsareclinicallyuncertaininhospitalsettingsamultimethodstudyusingnormalisationprocesstheory AT flissemmurtagh implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovecareforpatientswhosesituationsareclinicallyuncertaininhospitalsettingsamultimethodstudyusingnormalisationprocesstheory AT deokheeyi implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovecareforpatientswhosesituationsareclinicallyuncertaininhospitalsettingsamultimethodstudyusingnormalisationprocesstheory AT weigao implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovecareforpatientswhosesituationsareclinicallyuncertaininhospitalsettingsamultimethodstudyusingnormalisationprocesstheory AT elizabethlsampson implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovecareforpatientswhosesituationsareclinicallyuncertaininhospitalsettingsamultimethodstudyusingnormalisationprocesstheory AT joannedroney implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovecareforpatientswhosesituationsareclinicallyuncertaininhospitalsettingsamultimethodstudyusingnormalisationprocesstheory AT moragfarquhar implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovecareforpatientswhosesituationsareclinicallyuncertaininhospitalsettingsamultimethodstudyusingnormalisationprocesstheory AT jonathankoffman implementationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovecareforpatientswhosesituationsareclinicallyuncertaininhospitalsettingsamultimethodstudyusingnormalisationprocesstheory |