Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the angioedema control test

Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the angioedema control test

Abstract Background The Angioedema Control Test (AECT) is a patient‐reported outcome measure developed and validated for the assessment of disease control in patients with recurrent angioedema. Its sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) have hitherto not been establ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Lauré M. Fijen, Carolina Vera, Thomas Buttgereit, Hanna Bonnekoh, Marcus Maurer, Markus Magerl, Karsten Weller
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Wiley 2023-09-01
Series:	Clinical and Translational Allergy
Subjects:	angioedema disease control minimal clinically important difference (MCID)7 patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) sensitivity to change
Online Access:	https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12295

Similar Items

Minimal important differences for fatigue patient reported outcome measures—a systematic review
by: Åsa Nordin, et al.
Published: (2016-05-01)

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Scales Reported in Stroke Trials: A Review
by: Biswamohan Mishra, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Case report: Recurrent angioedema: Diagnosing the rare and the frequent
by: Thomas Buttgereit, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Minimal clinically important difference for the Mandarin version of the Tinnitus Questionnaire determined via anchor-based and distribution-based methods
by: Hailing Gu, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty: review of terminologies, methods and proposed values
by: Siddhartha Maredupaka, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01)

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Achievement of Substantial Reperfusion With Endovascular Thrombectomy Devices in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment
by: Chun-Jen Lin, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Changes Over a Decade in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Minimal Clinically Important Difference Reporting in Total Joint Arthroplasty
by: Boaz Goldberg, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures for neurological conditions: Review of concept and methods
by: Biswamohan Mishra, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for common outcome instruments in patients with a closed humeral shaft fracture - analysis of the FISH randomised clinical trial data
by: Thomas Ibounig, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

Demystifying the Value of Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Context
by: Dimitrios E. Magouliotis, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Gait and Balance Ability in Patients Who Underwent Corrective Long Spinal Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity
by: Tomoyoshi Sakaguchi, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Minimal clinically important difference as a method for assessing the effectiveness of spinal surgery using scales and questionnaires: non-systematic literature review
by: Olga N. Leonova, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Establishing the Minimum Clinically Significant Difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom Score (PASS) for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in Patients with Rotator Cuff Disease and Shoulder Prosthesis
by: Umile Giuseppe Longo, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)

Pulmonary function decreases moderately after accelerated high‐dose irradiation for stage III non‐small cell lung cancer
by: Brane Grambozov, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Defining the minimally clinically important difference of the SF-36 physical function subscale for paediatric CFS/ME: triangulation using three different methods
by: Amberly Brigden, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
by: Filippo Migliorini, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

The minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures related to female urinary incontinence: a systematic review
by: Jordana Barbosa-Silva, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)

Monitoring recurrent angioedema: Findings from the Turkish angioedema control test validation study
by: Semra Demir, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)

Effectiveness of the Fascial Manipulation Approach Associated with a Physiotherapy Program in Recurrent Shoulder Disease
by: Silvia Bellotti, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Evaluating the Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Womac Osteoarthritis Index after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
by: Umile Giuseppe Longo, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

What Is the Smallest Change in Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements That Can Be Attributed to Clinical Changes in Arterial Stiffness with Certainty: A Randomized Cross-Over Study
by: Mario Podrug, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Responsiveness of five shoulder outcome measures at follow-ups from 3 to 24 months
by: Øystein Skare, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Assessment of disease activity and quality of life in patients with recurrent bradykinin-mediated versus mast cell-mediated angioedema
by: Pelin Kuteyla Can, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Commentary: “Healthcare Professionals’ Preferred Efficacy Endpoints and Minimal Clinically Important Differences in the Assessment of New Medicines for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease” by Dankers M et al. in Frontiers in Pharmacology 2020; 10: 1519
by: Harma Alma, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Patient‐physician interactions in hereditary angioedema—Key learnings from the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
by: Marcus Maurer, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Minimal clinically important differences in six-minute walking distance in late-onset Pompe disease
by: Kristl G. Claeys, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01)

Neuroimaging mechanisms of acupuncture on functional reorganization for post-stroke motor improvement: a machine learning-based functional magnetic resonance imaging study
by: Mengxin Lu, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)

Clinical Interpretation of Efficacy Outcomes in Pharmacological Studies on Triple Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy for Uncontrolled Asthma: Assessment of IRIDIUM and ARGON Studies
by: Rogliani P, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Epidemiology of Bradykinin-mediated angioedema: a systematic investigation of epidemiological studies
by: Emel Aygören-Pürsün, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01)

Angioedema and Fatty Acids
by: Akane Wada, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)

Hereditary angioedema
by: Helen Lesser, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Pediatric Angioedema without Wheals: How to Guide the Diagnosis
by: Lucia Liotti, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

What Is the Minimum Clinically Important Change in Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia? PANSS Based Post-hoc Analyses of a Phase III Clinical Trial
by: Pál Czobor, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

Angioedema
by: Luisa María Holguín-Gómez, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01)

Use of the minimal important difference as a criterion for clinical importance—are we off track?
by: Stefan Moosmayer, MD, PhD
Published: (2023-02-01)

High occurrence of antihistamine resistance in patients with recurrent idiopathic angioedema
by: Zonne L. M. Hofman, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)

Hereditary angioedema, a battle for an accurate diagnosis
by: Lay Salazar Torres, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)

Prevalence of autoantibodies in a group of hereditary angioedema patients Prevalência de autoanticorpos em uma população com angioedema hereditário
by: Sergio Duarte Dortas Junior, et al.
Published: (2012-04-01)

Patient-rated angioedema severity using a novel photo-aid for predicting non-mast cell mediator-induced angioedema diagnosis
by: Chamard Wongsa, MD, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Determining the Minimal Clinical Important Difference for Medication Quantification Scale III and Morphine Milligram Equivalents in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
by: Lisa Goudman, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)