L’apathique et l’esthétique. Réflexions sur les clausules du Nom de la rose et du Pendule de Foucault d’Umberto Eco

This article proposes a comparison between the final pages of Umberto Eco’s first two novels : The Name of the Rose and The Foucault’s Pendulum. In Eco’s work, the theoretical activity in semiotics and the writing of novels were narrowly intertwined and narration had a very special role because, as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Piero Polidoro
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Récits Cultures Et Sociétés
Series:Cahiers de Narratologie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/narratologie/8304
_version_ 1797314879699288064
author Piero Polidoro
author_facet Piero Polidoro
author_sort Piero Polidoro
collection DOAJ
description This article proposes a comparison between the final pages of Umberto Eco’s first two novels : The Name of the Rose and The Foucault’s Pendulum. In Eco’s work, the theoretical activity in semiotics and the writing of novels were narrowly intertwined and narration had a very special role because, as Eco himself used to say, « what you cannot theorize about, you must narrate ».Hence, in order to better understand this comparison, we need to analyze some aspects of Eco’s thought. The first aspect is his position about realism in philosophical debate ; he supported a specific form of realism, not naïve, which he called « negative ». The second aspect is his « reasonable » approach to theoretical discussion. This reasonableness is always linked to the research of an anchor point, a handhold, a clasp, on which to build the rest of the system. It is exactly the presence of this kind of clasp the difference between the finals of the two novels. In The Name of the Rose the lack of an order brings William to a complete defeat, which leaves him in a state of apathy. On the contrary, in The Foucault’s Pendulum, in a situation even more dramatic than William’s one, Casaubon finally find his serenity, his meaning, in an aesthetic dimension.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T02:53:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e4a7527b51fa442eabce58d7a7ecb7cc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0993-8516
1765-307X
language fra
last_indexed 2024-03-08T02:53:33Z
publisher Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Récits Cultures Et Sociétés
record_format Article
series Cahiers de Narratologie
spelling doaj.art-e4a7527b51fa442eabce58d7a7ecb7cc2024-02-13T13:08:22ZfraLaboratoire Interdisciplinaire Récits Cultures Et SociétésCahiers de Narratologie0993-85161765-307X3310.4000/narratologie.8304L’apathique et l’esthétique. Réflexions sur les clausules du Nom de la rose et du Pendule de Foucault d’Umberto EcoPiero PolidoroThis article proposes a comparison between the final pages of Umberto Eco’s first two novels : The Name of the Rose and The Foucault’s Pendulum. In Eco’s work, the theoretical activity in semiotics and the writing of novels were narrowly intertwined and narration had a very special role because, as Eco himself used to say, « what you cannot theorize about, you must narrate ».Hence, in order to better understand this comparison, we need to analyze some aspects of Eco’s thought. The first aspect is his position about realism in philosophical debate ; he supported a specific form of realism, not naïve, which he called « negative ». The second aspect is his « reasonable » approach to theoretical discussion. This reasonableness is always linked to the research of an anchor point, a handhold, a clasp, on which to build the rest of the system. It is exactly the presence of this kind of clasp the difference between the finals of the two novels. In The Name of the Rose the lack of an order brings William to a complete defeat, which leaves him in a state of apathy. On the contrary, in The Foucault’s Pendulum, in a situation even more dramatic than William’s one, Casaubon finally find his serenity, his meaning, in an aesthetic dimension.https://journals.openedition.org/narratologie/8304narrationUmberto EcoThe Name of the RoseFoucault’s Pendulumrealismsemiotics
spellingShingle Piero Polidoro
L’apathique et l’esthétique. Réflexions sur les clausules du Nom de la rose et du Pendule de Foucault d’Umberto Eco
Cahiers de Narratologie
narration
Umberto Eco
The Name of the Rose
Foucault’s Pendulum
realism
semiotics
title L’apathique et l’esthétique. Réflexions sur les clausules du Nom de la rose et du Pendule de Foucault d’Umberto Eco
title_full L’apathique et l’esthétique. Réflexions sur les clausules du Nom de la rose et du Pendule de Foucault d’Umberto Eco
title_fullStr L’apathique et l’esthétique. Réflexions sur les clausules du Nom de la rose et du Pendule de Foucault d’Umberto Eco
title_full_unstemmed L’apathique et l’esthétique. Réflexions sur les clausules du Nom de la rose et du Pendule de Foucault d’Umberto Eco
title_short L’apathique et l’esthétique. Réflexions sur les clausules du Nom de la rose et du Pendule de Foucault d’Umberto Eco
title_sort l apathique et l esthetique reflexions sur les clausules du nom de la rose et du pendule de foucault d umberto eco
topic narration
Umberto Eco
The Name of the Rose
Foucault’s Pendulum
realism
semiotics
url https://journals.openedition.org/narratologie/8304
work_keys_str_mv AT pieropolidoro lapathiqueetlesthetiquereflexionssurlesclausulesdunomdelaroseetdupenduledefoucaultdumbertoeco