Monitoring attentional state with fNIRS

The ability to distinguish between high and low levels of task engagement in the real world is important for detecting and preventing performance decrements during safety-critical operational tasks. We therefore investigated whether functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS), a portable brain neu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angela R. Harrivel, Daniel H. Weissman, Douglas C. Noll, Scott J. Peltier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00861/full
_version_ 1819225198312816640
author Angela R. Harrivel
Angela R. Harrivel
Daniel H. Weissman
Douglas C. Noll
Scott J. Peltier
author_facet Angela R. Harrivel
Angela R. Harrivel
Daniel H. Weissman
Douglas C. Noll
Scott J. Peltier
author_sort Angela R. Harrivel
collection DOAJ
description The ability to distinguish between high and low levels of task engagement in the real world is important for detecting and preventing performance decrements during safety-critical operational tasks. We therefore investigated whether functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS), a portable brain neuroimaging technique, can be used to distinguish between high and low levels of task engagement during the performance of a selective attention task. A group of participants performed the multi-source interference task (MSIT) while we recorded brain activity with fNIRS from two brain regions. One was a key region of the task-positive network, which is associated with relatively high levels of task engagement. The second was a key region of the task-negative network, which is associated with relatively low levels of task engagement (e.g., resting and not performing a task). Using activity in these regions as inputs to a multivariate pattern classifier, we were able to predict above chance levels whether participants were engaged in performing the MSIT or resting. We were also able to replicate prior findings from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) indicating that activity in task-positive and task-negative regions is negatively correlated during task performance. Finally, data from a companion fMRI study verified our assumptions about the sources of brain activity in the fNIRS experiment and established an upper bound on classification accuracy in our task. Together, our findings suggest that fNIRS could prove quite useful for monitoring cognitive state in real-world settings.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T10:05:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e4b3040dacc04b8794040e229afd5f63
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T10:05:47Z
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-e4b3040dacc04b8794040e229afd5f632022-12-21T17:51:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612013-12-01710.3389/fnhum.2013.0086170628Monitoring attentional state with fNIRSAngela R. Harrivel0Angela R. Harrivel1Daniel H. Weissman2Douglas C. Noll3Scott J. Peltier4NASA Glenn Research CenterUniversity of MichiganUniversity of MichiganUniversity of MichiganUniversity of MichiganThe ability to distinguish between high and low levels of task engagement in the real world is important for detecting and preventing performance decrements during safety-critical operational tasks. We therefore investigated whether functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS), a portable brain neuroimaging technique, can be used to distinguish between high and low levels of task engagement during the performance of a selective attention task. A group of participants performed the multi-source interference task (MSIT) while we recorded brain activity with fNIRS from two brain regions. One was a key region of the task-positive network, which is associated with relatively high levels of task engagement. The second was a key region of the task-negative network, which is associated with relatively low levels of task engagement (e.g., resting and not performing a task). Using activity in these regions as inputs to a multivariate pattern classifier, we were able to predict above chance levels whether participants were engaged in performing the MSIT or resting. We were also able to replicate prior findings from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) indicating that activity in task-positive and task-negative regions is negatively correlated during task performance. Finally, data from a companion fMRI study verified our assumptions about the sources of brain activity in the fNIRS experiment and established an upper bound on classification accuracy in our task. Together, our findings suggest that fNIRS could prove quite useful for monitoring cognitive state in real-world settings.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00861/fullAttentionClassificationDefault Mode Networkhuman performanceNear infra-red spectroscopy
spellingShingle Angela R. Harrivel
Angela R. Harrivel
Daniel H. Weissman
Douglas C. Noll
Scott J. Peltier
Monitoring attentional state with fNIRS
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Attention
Classification
Default Mode Network
human performance
Near infra-red spectroscopy
title Monitoring attentional state with fNIRS
title_full Monitoring attentional state with fNIRS
title_fullStr Monitoring attentional state with fNIRS
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring attentional state with fNIRS
title_short Monitoring attentional state with fNIRS
title_sort monitoring attentional state with fnirs
topic Attention
Classification
Default Mode Network
human performance
Near infra-red spectroscopy
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00861/full
work_keys_str_mv AT angelarharrivel monitoringattentionalstatewithfnirs
AT angelarharrivel monitoringattentionalstatewithfnirs
AT danielhweissman monitoringattentionalstatewithfnirs
AT douglascnoll monitoringattentionalstatewithfnirs
AT scottjpeltier monitoringattentionalstatewithfnirs