JURISLINGUISTIC POINT OF VIEW ON LEGAL HERMENEUTICS (based on the electoral disputes)

Given the potential for conflict of legal and jurislinguistic hermeneutics, the author examines in this perspective the little-studied object of electorial disputes. The author shows that it is allowed in the interpretation of the universal mechanism of discretion, which is a special legal institute...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: E. S. Кara-Murza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kemerovo State University 2016-07-01
Series:Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/1980
_version_ 1797781670915473408
author E. S. Кara-Murza
author_facet E. S. Кara-Murza
author_sort E. S. Кara-Murza
collection DOAJ
description Given the potential for conflict of legal and jurislinguistic hermeneutics, the author examines in this perspective the little-studied object of electorial disputes. The author shows that it is allowed in the interpretation of the universal mechanism of discretion, which is a special legal institute, and in the field of electoral conflict it is manifested as a variant of legal hermeneutics. According to the author, discretion demonstrates the subjectivity of the officialbusiness style/judicial discourse – the property is still poorly taken into consideration in linguistics.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:00:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e4c2cacc23744cdf8fef3772756a39e3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2078-8975
2078-8983
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:00:24Z
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher Kemerovo State University
record_format Article
series Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета
spelling doaj.art-e4c2cacc23744cdf8fef3772756a39e32023-07-13T12:08:24ZengKemerovo State UniversityВестник Кемеровского государственного университета2078-89752078-89832016-07-010313614210.21603/2078-8975-2016-3-136-1421953JURISLINGUISTIC POINT OF VIEW ON LEGAL HERMENEUTICS (based on the electoral disputes)E. S. Кara-Murza0Moscow State University of M. V. LomonosovGiven the potential for conflict of legal and jurislinguistic hermeneutics, the author examines in this perspective the little-studied object of electorial disputes. The author shows that it is allowed in the interpretation of the universal mechanism of discretion, which is a special legal institute, and in the field of electoral conflict it is manifested as a variant of legal hermeneutics. According to the author, discretion demonstrates the subjectivity of the officialbusiness style/judicial discourse – the property is still poorly taken into consideration in linguistics.https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/1980legal hermeneuticsdiscretionelectoral disputesubjectivity of the judicial discourse
spellingShingle E. S. Кara-Murza
JURISLINGUISTIC POINT OF VIEW ON LEGAL HERMENEUTICS (based on the electoral disputes)
Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета
legal hermeneutics
discretion
electoral dispute
subjectivity of the judicial discourse
title JURISLINGUISTIC POINT OF VIEW ON LEGAL HERMENEUTICS (based on the electoral disputes)
title_full JURISLINGUISTIC POINT OF VIEW ON LEGAL HERMENEUTICS (based on the electoral disputes)
title_fullStr JURISLINGUISTIC POINT OF VIEW ON LEGAL HERMENEUTICS (based on the electoral disputes)
title_full_unstemmed JURISLINGUISTIC POINT OF VIEW ON LEGAL HERMENEUTICS (based on the electoral disputes)
title_short JURISLINGUISTIC POINT OF VIEW ON LEGAL HERMENEUTICS (based on the electoral disputes)
title_sort jurislinguistic point of view on legal hermeneutics based on the electoral disputes
topic legal hermeneutics
discretion
electoral dispute
subjectivity of the judicial discourse
url https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/1980
work_keys_str_mv AT eskaramurza jurislinguisticpointofviewonlegalhermeneuticsbasedontheelectoraldisputes