Imposing constraints on parameter values of a conceptual hydrological model using baseflow response

Calibration of conceptual hydrological models is frequently limited by a lack of data about the area that is being studied. The result is that a broad range of parameter values can be identified that will give an equally good calibration to the available observations, usually of stream flow. The use...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S. M. Dunn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 1999-01-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/3/271/1999/hess-3-271-1999.pdf
_version_ 1818313465369985024
author S. M. Dunn
S. M. Dunn
author_facet S. M. Dunn
S. M. Dunn
author_sort S. M. Dunn
collection DOAJ
description Calibration of conceptual hydrological models is frequently limited by a lack of data about the area that is being studied. The result is that a broad range of parameter values can be identified that will give an equally good calibration to the available observations, usually of stream flow. The use of total stream flow can bias analyses towards interpretation of rapid runoff, whereas water quality issues are more frequently associated with low flow condition. This paper demonstrates how model distinctions between surface an sub-surface runoff can be used to define a likelihood measure based on the sub-surface (or baseflow) response. This helps to provide more information about the model behaviour, constrain the acceptable parameter sets and reduce uncertainty in streamflow prediction. A conceptual model, DIY, is applied to two contrasting catchments in Scotland, the Ythan and the Carron Valley. Parameter ranges and envelopes of prediction are identified using criteria based on total flow efficiency, baseflow efficiency and combined efficiencies. The individual parameter ranges derived using the combined efficiency measures still cover relatively wide bands, but are better constrained for the Carron than the Ythan. This reflects the fact that hydrological behaviour in the Carron is dominated by a much flashier surface response than in the Ythan. Hence, the total flow efficiency is more strongly controlled by surface runoff in the Carron and there is a greater contrast with the baseflow efficiency. Comparisons of the predictions using different efficiency measures for the Ythan also suggest that there is a danger of confusing parameter uncertainties with data and model error, if inadequate likelihood measures are defined.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T08:34:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e4c760d809844a9caf92b5f0157a79b5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T08:34:11Z
publishDate 1999-01-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-e4c760d809844a9caf92b5f0157a79b52022-12-21T23:53:41ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79381999-01-0132271284Imposing constraints on parameter values of a conceptual hydrological model using baseflow responseS. M. DunnS. M. DunnCalibration of conceptual hydrological models is frequently limited by a lack of data about the area that is being studied. The result is that a broad range of parameter values can be identified that will give an equally good calibration to the available observations, usually of stream flow. The use of total stream flow can bias analyses towards interpretation of rapid runoff, whereas water quality issues are more frequently associated with low flow condition. This paper demonstrates how model distinctions between surface an sub-surface runoff can be used to define a likelihood measure based on the sub-surface (or baseflow) response. This helps to provide more information about the model behaviour, constrain the acceptable parameter sets and reduce uncertainty in streamflow prediction. A conceptual model, DIY, is applied to two contrasting catchments in Scotland, the Ythan and the Carron Valley. Parameter ranges and envelopes of prediction are identified using criteria based on total flow efficiency, baseflow efficiency and combined efficiencies. The individual parameter ranges derived using the combined efficiency measures still cover relatively wide bands, but are better constrained for the Carron than the Ythan. This reflects the fact that hydrological behaviour in the Carron is dominated by a much flashier surface response than in the Ythan. Hence, the total flow efficiency is more strongly controlled by surface runoff in the Carron and there is a greater contrast with the baseflow efficiency. Comparisons of the predictions using different efficiency measures for the Ythan also suggest that there is a danger of confusing parameter uncertainties with data and model error, if inadequate likelihood measures are defined.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/3/271/1999/hess-3-271-1999.pdf
spellingShingle S. M. Dunn
S. M. Dunn
Imposing constraints on parameter values of a conceptual hydrological model using baseflow response
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title Imposing constraints on parameter values of a conceptual hydrological model using baseflow response
title_full Imposing constraints on parameter values of a conceptual hydrological model using baseflow response
title_fullStr Imposing constraints on parameter values of a conceptual hydrological model using baseflow response
title_full_unstemmed Imposing constraints on parameter values of a conceptual hydrological model using baseflow response
title_short Imposing constraints on parameter values of a conceptual hydrological model using baseflow response
title_sort imposing constraints on parameter values of a conceptual hydrological model using baseflow response
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/3/271/1999/hess-3-271-1999.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT smdunn imposingconstraintsonparametervaluesofaconceptualhydrologicalmodelusingbaseflowresponse
AT smdunn imposingconstraintsonparametervaluesofaconceptualhydrologicalmodelusingbaseflowresponse