A dominant-negative FGF1 mutant (the R50E mutant) suppresses tumorigenesis and angiogenesis.

Fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF1) and FGF2 play a critical role in angiogenesis, a formation of new blood vessels from existing blood vessels. Integrins are critically involved in FGF signaling through crosstalk. We previously reported that FGF1 directly binds to integrin αvβ3 and induces FGF recept...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seiji Mori, Vu Tran, Kyoko Nishikawa, Teruya Kaneda, Yoshinosuke Hamada, Naomasa Kawaguchi, Masaaki Fujita, Jun Saegusa, Yoko K Takada, Nariaki Matsuura, Min Zhao, Yoshikazu Takada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3585250?pdf=render
_version_ 1819162560607289344
author Seiji Mori
Vu Tran
Kyoko Nishikawa
Teruya Kaneda
Yoshinosuke Hamada
Naomasa Kawaguchi
Masaaki Fujita
Jun Saegusa
Yoko K Takada
Nariaki Matsuura
Min Zhao
Yoshikazu Takada
author_facet Seiji Mori
Vu Tran
Kyoko Nishikawa
Teruya Kaneda
Yoshinosuke Hamada
Naomasa Kawaguchi
Masaaki Fujita
Jun Saegusa
Yoko K Takada
Nariaki Matsuura
Min Zhao
Yoshikazu Takada
author_sort Seiji Mori
collection DOAJ
description Fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF1) and FGF2 play a critical role in angiogenesis, a formation of new blood vessels from existing blood vessels. Integrins are critically involved in FGF signaling through crosstalk. We previously reported that FGF1 directly binds to integrin αvβ3 and induces FGF receptor-1 (FGFR1)-FGF1-integrin αvβ3 ternary complex. We previously generated an integrin binding defective FGF1 mutant (Arg-50 to Glu, R50E). R50E is defective in inducing ternary complex formation, cell proliferation, and cell migration, and suppresses FGF signaling induced by WT FGF1 (a dominant-negative effect) in vitro. These findings suggest that FGFR and αvβ3 crosstalk through direct integrin binding to FGF, and that R50E acts as an antagonist to FGFR. We studied if R50E suppresses tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. Here we describe that R50E suppressed tumor growth in vivo while WT FGF1 enhanced it using cancer cells that stably express WT FGF1 or R50E. Since R50E did not affect proliferation of cancer cells in vitro, we hypothesized that R50E suppressed tumorigenesis indirectly through suppressing angiogenesis. We thus studied the effect of R50E on angiogenesis in several angiogenesis models. We found that excess R50E suppressed FGF1-induced migration and tube formation of endothelial cells, FGF1-induced angiogenesis in matrigel plug assays, and the outgrowth of cells in aorta ring assays. Excess R50E suppressed FGF1-induced angiogenesis in chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assays. Interestingly, excess R50E suppressed FGF2-induced angiogenesis in CAM assays as well, suggesting that R50E may uniquely suppress signaling from other members of the FGF family. Taken together, our results suggest that R50E suppresses angiogenesis induced by FGF1 or FGF2, and thereby indirectly suppresses tumorigenesis, in addition to its possible direct effect on tumor cell proliferation in vivo. We propose that R50E has potential as an anti-cancer and anti-angiogenesis therapeutic agent ("FGF1 decoy").
first_indexed 2024-12-22T17:30:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e4e462e69e074467bf74bcf33a683f77
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T17:30:11Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-e4e462e69e074467bf74bcf33a683f772022-12-21T18:18:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0182e5792710.1371/journal.pone.0057927A dominant-negative FGF1 mutant (the R50E mutant) suppresses tumorigenesis and angiogenesis.Seiji MoriVu TranKyoko NishikawaTeruya KanedaYoshinosuke HamadaNaomasa KawaguchiMasaaki FujitaJun SaegusaYoko K TakadaNariaki MatsuuraMin ZhaoYoshikazu TakadaFibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF1) and FGF2 play a critical role in angiogenesis, a formation of new blood vessels from existing blood vessels. Integrins are critically involved in FGF signaling through crosstalk. We previously reported that FGF1 directly binds to integrin αvβ3 and induces FGF receptor-1 (FGFR1)-FGF1-integrin αvβ3 ternary complex. We previously generated an integrin binding defective FGF1 mutant (Arg-50 to Glu, R50E). R50E is defective in inducing ternary complex formation, cell proliferation, and cell migration, and suppresses FGF signaling induced by WT FGF1 (a dominant-negative effect) in vitro. These findings suggest that FGFR and αvβ3 crosstalk through direct integrin binding to FGF, and that R50E acts as an antagonist to FGFR. We studied if R50E suppresses tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. Here we describe that R50E suppressed tumor growth in vivo while WT FGF1 enhanced it using cancer cells that stably express WT FGF1 or R50E. Since R50E did not affect proliferation of cancer cells in vitro, we hypothesized that R50E suppressed tumorigenesis indirectly through suppressing angiogenesis. We thus studied the effect of R50E on angiogenesis in several angiogenesis models. We found that excess R50E suppressed FGF1-induced migration and tube formation of endothelial cells, FGF1-induced angiogenesis in matrigel plug assays, and the outgrowth of cells in aorta ring assays. Excess R50E suppressed FGF1-induced angiogenesis in chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assays. Interestingly, excess R50E suppressed FGF2-induced angiogenesis in CAM assays as well, suggesting that R50E may uniquely suppress signaling from other members of the FGF family. Taken together, our results suggest that R50E suppresses angiogenesis induced by FGF1 or FGF2, and thereby indirectly suppresses tumorigenesis, in addition to its possible direct effect on tumor cell proliferation in vivo. We propose that R50E has potential as an anti-cancer and anti-angiogenesis therapeutic agent ("FGF1 decoy").http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3585250?pdf=render
spellingShingle Seiji Mori
Vu Tran
Kyoko Nishikawa
Teruya Kaneda
Yoshinosuke Hamada
Naomasa Kawaguchi
Masaaki Fujita
Jun Saegusa
Yoko K Takada
Nariaki Matsuura
Min Zhao
Yoshikazu Takada
A dominant-negative FGF1 mutant (the R50E mutant) suppresses tumorigenesis and angiogenesis.
PLoS ONE
title A dominant-negative FGF1 mutant (the R50E mutant) suppresses tumorigenesis and angiogenesis.
title_full A dominant-negative FGF1 mutant (the R50E mutant) suppresses tumorigenesis and angiogenesis.
title_fullStr A dominant-negative FGF1 mutant (the R50E mutant) suppresses tumorigenesis and angiogenesis.
title_full_unstemmed A dominant-negative FGF1 mutant (the R50E mutant) suppresses tumorigenesis and angiogenesis.
title_short A dominant-negative FGF1 mutant (the R50E mutant) suppresses tumorigenesis and angiogenesis.
title_sort dominant negative fgf1 mutant the r50e mutant suppresses tumorigenesis and angiogenesis
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3585250?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT seijimori adominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT vutran adominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT kyokonishikawa adominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT teruyakaneda adominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT yoshinosukehamada adominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT naomasakawaguchi adominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT masaakifujita adominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT junsaegusa adominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT yokoktakada adominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT nariakimatsuura adominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT minzhao adominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT yoshikazutakada adominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT seijimori dominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT vutran dominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT kyokonishikawa dominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT teruyakaneda dominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT yoshinosukehamada dominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT naomasakawaguchi dominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT masaakifujita dominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT junsaegusa dominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT yokoktakada dominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT nariakimatsuura dominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT minzhao dominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis
AT yoshikazutakada dominantnegativefgf1mutantther50emutantsuppressestumorigenesisandangiogenesis