Mapping climate change vulnerability of aquatic-riparian ecosystems using decision-relevant indicators

Climate change has and is projected to continue to alter historical regimes of temperature, precipitation, and hydrology. To assess the vulnerability of climate change from a land management perspective and spatially identify where the most extreme changes are anticipated to occur, we worked in coll...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John T. Delaney, Kristen L. Bouska, Josh D. Eash, Patricia J. Heglund, Andrew J. Allstadt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-06-01
Series:Ecological Indicators
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21002466
_version_ 1818843712249135104
author John T. Delaney
Kristen L. Bouska
Josh D. Eash
Patricia J. Heglund
Andrew J. Allstadt
author_facet John T. Delaney
Kristen L. Bouska
Josh D. Eash
Patricia J. Heglund
Andrew J. Allstadt
author_sort John T. Delaney
collection DOAJ
description Climate change has and is projected to continue to alter historical regimes of temperature, precipitation, and hydrology. To assess the vulnerability of climate change from a land management perspective and spatially identify where the most extreme changes are anticipated to occur, we worked in collaboration with land managers to develop a climate change vulnerability map for the midwestern United States with a focus on riparian systems. The map is intended for use by regional administrators to help them work across various program areas (e.g. fisheries, endangered species) to prioritize locations needing support for adaptation planning. The tool can also be utilized locally by managers to better understand the effects that projected climate scenarios have on the hydrology of management units as they develop adaptation strategies. The vulnerability map is watershed-based (360 watershed units within the region) and combines 15 climate change indicators that were selected by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service natural resource managers based upon known and anticipated effects to species and habitats. The projected change in each of these indicators from the historical period (1986–2005) to the future period (2040–2059) was aggregated into a composite score for each watershed. Landscape-scale metrics reflective of a watershed’s adaptive capacity were combined with the climate change indicators to produce a vulnerability score. We found sub-regional variation in vulnerability to climate change with the greatest vulnerability in Iowa, central Illinois, and northwest Ohio. Greater vulnerability was seen in the higher greenhouse gas concentration scenario, Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 compared to the lower greenhouse gas concentration scenario RCP 4.5, when looking at the mean of the five downscaled climate models used in this study. By quantifying and mapping climate change vulnerability, natural resource managers can better understand the degree of vulnerability for individual watersheds and identify areas of prioritization in regional and local planning efforts.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T05:02:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e4f7f2eddd69467496ff604b14296063
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1470-160X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T05:02:13Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Ecological Indicators
spelling doaj.art-e4f7f2eddd69467496ff604b142960632022-12-21T20:35:03ZengElsevierEcological Indicators1470-160X2021-06-01125107581Mapping climate change vulnerability of aquatic-riparian ecosystems using decision-relevant indicatorsJohn T. Delaney0Kristen L. Bouska1Josh D. Eash2Patricia J. Heglund3Andrew J. Allstadt4U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, 2630 Fanta Reed Road, La Crosse, WI 54603, United States; Corresponding author.U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, 2630 Fanta Reed Road, La Crosse, WI 54603, United StatesU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 5600 American Blvd West, Bloomington, MN 55437, United StatesU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2630 Fanta Reed Road, La Crosse, WI 54603, United StatesU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 5600 American Blvd West, Bloomington, MN 55437, United StatesClimate change has and is projected to continue to alter historical regimes of temperature, precipitation, and hydrology. To assess the vulnerability of climate change from a land management perspective and spatially identify where the most extreme changes are anticipated to occur, we worked in collaboration with land managers to develop a climate change vulnerability map for the midwestern United States with a focus on riparian systems. The map is intended for use by regional administrators to help them work across various program areas (e.g. fisheries, endangered species) to prioritize locations needing support for adaptation planning. The tool can also be utilized locally by managers to better understand the effects that projected climate scenarios have on the hydrology of management units as they develop adaptation strategies. The vulnerability map is watershed-based (360 watershed units within the region) and combines 15 climate change indicators that were selected by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service natural resource managers based upon known and anticipated effects to species and habitats. The projected change in each of these indicators from the historical period (1986–2005) to the future period (2040–2059) was aggregated into a composite score for each watershed. Landscape-scale metrics reflective of a watershed’s adaptive capacity were combined with the climate change indicators to produce a vulnerability score. We found sub-regional variation in vulnerability to climate change with the greatest vulnerability in Iowa, central Illinois, and northwest Ohio. Greater vulnerability was seen in the higher greenhouse gas concentration scenario, Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 compared to the lower greenhouse gas concentration scenario RCP 4.5, when looking at the mean of the five downscaled climate models used in this study. By quantifying and mapping climate change vulnerability, natural resource managers can better understand the degree of vulnerability for individual watersheds and identify areas of prioritization in regional and local planning efforts.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21002466Climate changeVulnerabilityIndicatorWatershed modelingHotspot mappingAdaptive capacity
spellingShingle John T. Delaney
Kristen L. Bouska
Josh D. Eash
Patricia J. Heglund
Andrew J. Allstadt
Mapping climate change vulnerability of aquatic-riparian ecosystems using decision-relevant indicators
Ecological Indicators
Climate change
Vulnerability
Indicator
Watershed modeling
Hotspot mapping
Adaptive capacity
title Mapping climate change vulnerability of aquatic-riparian ecosystems using decision-relevant indicators
title_full Mapping climate change vulnerability of aquatic-riparian ecosystems using decision-relevant indicators
title_fullStr Mapping climate change vulnerability of aquatic-riparian ecosystems using decision-relevant indicators
title_full_unstemmed Mapping climate change vulnerability of aquatic-riparian ecosystems using decision-relevant indicators
title_short Mapping climate change vulnerability of aquatic-riparian ecosystems using decision-relevant indicators
title_sort mapping climate change vulnerability of aquatic riparian ecosystems using decision relevant indicators
topic Climate change
Vulnerability
Indicator
Watershed modeling
Hotspot mapping
Adaptive capacity
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21002466
work_keys_str_mv AT johntdelaney mappingclimatechangevulnerabilityofaquaticriparianecosystemsusingdecisionrelevantindicators
AT kristenlbouska mappingclimatechangevulnerabilityofaquaticriparianecosystemsusingdecisionrelevantindicators
AT joshdeash mappingclimatechangevulnerabilityofaquaticriparianecosystemsusingdecisionrelevantindicators
AT patriciajheglund mappingclimatechangevulnerabilityofaquaticriparianecosystemsusingdecisionrelevantindicators
AT andrewjallstadt mappingclimatechangevulnerabilityofaquaticriparianecosystemsusingdecisionrelevantindicators