How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information.

Political behaviour increasingly takes place on digital platforms, where people are presented with a range of social information-real-time feedback about the behaviour of peers and reference groups-which can stimulate (or depress) participation. This social information is hypothesized to impact the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scott A Hale, Peter John, Helen Margetts, Taha Yasseri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5922527?pdf=render
_version_ 1818460494172782592
author Scott A Hale
Peter John
Helen Margetts
Taha Yasseri
author_facet Scott A Hale
Peter John
Helen Margetts
Taha Yasseri
author_sort Scott A Hale
collection DOAJ
description Political behaviour increasingly takes place on digital platforms, where people are presented with a range of social information-real-time feedback about the behaviour of peers and reference groups-which can stimulate (or depress) participation. This social information is hypothesized to impact the distribution of political activity, stimulating participation in mobilizations that are increasing in popularity, and depressing participation in those that appear to be less popular, leading to a non-normal distribution. Changes to these platforms can generate natural experiments allowing for an estimate of the impact of different kinds of social information on participation. This paper tests the hypothesis that social information shapes the distribution of political mobilizations by examining the introduction of trending information to the homepage of the UK government petition platform. The introduction of the trending feature did not increase the overall number of signatures per day, but the distribution of signatures across petitions changed significantly-the most popular petitions gained more signatures at the expense of those with fewer signatories. We further find significant differences between petitions trending at different ranks on the homepage. This evidence suggests that the ubiquity of trending information on digital platforms is introducing instability into political markets, as has been shown for cultural markets. As well as highlighting the importance of digital design in shaping political behaviour, the findings suggest that a non-negligible group of individuals visit the homepage of the site looking for petitions to sign, without having decided the issues they wish to support in advance. These 'aimless petitioners' are particularly susceptible to changes in social information.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T23:31:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e50ca7b818fa4c0684eaf75c58608abb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T23:31:08Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-e50ca7b818fa4c0684eaf75c58608abb2022-12-21T22:43:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01134e019606810.1371/journal.pone.0196068How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information.Scott A HalePeter JohnHelen MargettsTaha YasseriPolitical behaviour increasingly takes place on digital platforms, where people are presented with a range of social information-real-time feedback about the behaviour of peers and reference groups-which can stimulate (or depress) participation. This social information is hypothesized to impact the distribution of political activity, stimulating participation in mobilizations that are increasing in popularity, and depressing participation in those that appear to be less popular, leading to a non-normal distribution. Changes to these platforms can generate natural experiments allowing for an estimate of the impact of different kinds of social information on participation. This paper tests the hypothesis that social information shapes the distribution of political mobilizations by examining the introduction of trending information to the homepage of the UK government petition platform. The introduction of the trending feature did not increase the overall number of signatures per day, but the distribution of signatures across petitions changed significantly-the most popular petitions gained more signatures at the expense of those with fewer signatories. We further find significant differences between petitions trending at different ranks on the homepage. This evidence suggests that the ubiquity of trending information on digital platforms is introducing instability into political markets, as has been shown for cultural markets. As well as highlighting the importance of digital design in shaping political behaviour, the findings suggest that a non-negligible group of individuals visit the homepage of the site looking for petitions to sign, without having decided the issues they wish to support in advance. These 'aimless petitioners' are particularly susceptible to changes in social information.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5922527?pdf=render
spellingShingle Scott A Hale
Peter John
Helen Margetts
Taha Yasseri
How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information.
PLoS ONE
title How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information.
title_full How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information.
title_fullStr How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information.
title_full_unstemmed How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information.
title_short How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information.
title_sort how digital design shapes political participation a natural experiment with social information
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5922527?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT scottahale howdigitaldesignshapespoliticalparticipationanaturalexperimentwithsocialinformation
AT peterjohn howdigitaldesignshapespoliticalparticipationanaturalexperimentwithsocialinformation
AT helenmargetts howdigitaldesignshapespoliticalparticipationanaturalexperimentwithsocialinformation
AT tahayasseri howdigitaldesignshapespoliticalparticipationanaturalexperimentwithsocialinformation