Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial
Abstract A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was performed compared the desensitizing efficacy of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) ClinproTM XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) and the conventional GIC Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK) in a 6-month follow-up. Subjects wer...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica
|
Series: | Brazilian Oral Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000100203&lng=en&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1818067394722004992 |
---|---|
author | Marina de Matos MADRUGA Adriana Fernandes da SILVA Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da ROSA Evandro PIVA Rafael Guerra LUND |
author_facet | Marina de Matos MADRUGA Adriana Fernandes da SILVA Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da ROSA Evandro PIVA Rafael Guerra LUND |
author_sort | Marina de Matos MADRUGA |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was performed compared the desensitizing efficacy of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) ClinproTM XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) and the conventional GIC Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK) in a 6-month follow-up. Subjects were required to have at least two teeth with dentin hypersensitivity. Teeth were divided at random into 2 groups, one group received Clinpro XT and the other conventional GIC Vidrion R. Treatments were assessed by tactile and air blast tests using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, after 20 minutes, and at 7, 15, 21, 30, 90 and 180 days post-treatment. Twenty subjects (152 teeth) were included. Both tests (tactile and air blast) showed a significant reduction of dentin hypersensitivity immediately after the application of Vidrion R and Clinpro XT (20 min). VAS scores obtained along the 6-month follow-up were statistically lower when compared to initial rates (p < 0.05). Both GIC were able to reduce dentin hypersensitivity up to 6-month post-treatment period without statistically significant differences among them (p > 0.05). Both cements provided satisfactory results in long-term dental sensitivity reduction. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T15:22:59Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e513c37fc4174ed19e945bd364f56ea7 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1807-3107 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T15:22:59Z |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica |
record_format | Article |
series | Brazilian Oral Research |
spelling | doaj.art-e513c37fc4174ed19e945bd364f56ea72022-12-22T01:43:38ZengSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa OdontológicaBrazilian Oral Research1807-310731010.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0003S1806-83242017000100203Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trialMarina de Matos MADRUGAAdriana Fernandes da SILVAWellington Luiz de Oliveira da ROSAEvandro PIVARafael Guerra LUNDAbstract A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was performed compared the desensitizing efficacy of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) ClinproTM XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) and the conventional GIC Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK) in a 6-month follow-up. Subjects were required to have at least two teeth with dentin hypersensitivity. Teeth were divided at random into 2 groups, one group received Clinpro XT and the other conventional GIC Vidrion R. Treatments were assessed by tactile and air blast tests using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, after 20 minutes, and at 7, 15, 21, 30, 90 and 180 days post-treatment. Twenty subjects (152 teeth) were included. Both tests (tactile and air blast) showed a significant reduction of dentin hypersensitivity immediately after the application of Vidrion R and Clinpro XT (20 min). VAS scores obtained along the 6-month follow-up were statistically lower when compared to initial rates (p < 0.05). Both GIC were able to reduce dentin hypersensitivity up to 6-month post-treatment period without statistically significant differences among them (p > 0.05). Both cements provided satisfactory results in long-term dental sensitivity reduction.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000100203&lng=en&tlng=enDentin SensitivityDentin Desensitizing AgentsGlass Ionomer CementsRandomized Controlled Trial |
spellingShingle | Marina de Matos MADRUGA Adriana Fernandes da SILVA Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da ROSA Evandro PIVA Rafael Guerra LUND Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial Brazilian Oral Research Dentin Sensitivity Dentin Desensitizing Agents Glass Ionomer Cements Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Dentin Sensitivity Dentin Desensitizing Agents Glass Ionomer Cements Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000100203&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marinadematosmadruga evaluationofdentinhypersensitivitytreatmentwithglassionomercementsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT adrianafernandesdasilva evaluationofdentinhypersensitivitytreatmentwithglassionomercementsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT wellingtonluizdeoliveiradarosa evaluationofdentinhypersensitivitytreatmentwithglassionomercementsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT evandropiva evaluationofdentinhypersensitivitytreatmentwithglassionomercementsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT rafaelguerralund evaluationofdentinhypersensitivitytreatmentwithglassionomercementsarandomizedclinicaltrial |