Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial

Abstract A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was performed compared the desensitizing efficacy of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) ClinproTM XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) and the conventional GIC Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK) in a 6-month follow-up. Subjects wer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marina de Matos MADRUGA, Adriana Fernandes da SILVA, Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da ROSA, Evandro PIVA, Rafael Guerra LUND
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica
Series:Brazilian Oral Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000100203&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818067394722004992
author Marina de Matos MADRUGA
Adriana Fernandes da SILVA
Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da ROSA
Evandro PIVA
Rafael Guerra LUND
author_facet Marina de Matos MADRUGA
Adriana Fernandes da SILVA
Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da ROSA
Evandro PIVA
Rafael Guerra LUND
author_sort Marina de Matos MADRUGA
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was performed compared the desensitizing efficacy of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) ClinproTM XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) and the conventional GIC Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK) in a 6-month follow-up. Subjects were required to have at least two teeth with dentin hypersensitivity. Teeth were divided at random into 2 groups, one group received Clinpro XT and the other conventional GIC Vidrion R. Treatments were assessed by tactile and air blast tests using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, after 20 minutes, and at 7, 15, 21, 30, 90 and 180 days post-treatment. Twenty subjects (152 teeth) were included. Both tests (tactile and air blast) showed a significant reduction of dentin hypersensitivity immediately after the application of Vidrion R and Clinpro XT (20 min). VAS scores obtained along the 6-month follow-up were statistically lower when compared to initial rates (p < 0.05). Both GIC were able to reduce dentin hypersensitivity up to 6-month post-treatment period without statistically significant differences among them (p > 0.05). Both cements provided satisfactory results in long-term dental sensitivity reduction.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T15:22:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e513c37fc4174ed19e945bd364f56ea7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1807-3107
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T15:22:59Z
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica
record_format Article
series Brazilian Oral Research
spelling doaj.art-e513c37fc4174ed19e945bd364f56ea72022-12-22T01:43:38ZengSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa OdontológicaBrazilian Oral Research1807-310731010.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0003S1806-83242017000100203Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trialMarina de Matos MADRUGAAdriana Fernandes da SILVAWellington Luiz de Oliveira da ROSAEvandro PIVARafael Guerra LUNDAbstract A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was performed compared the desensitizing efficacy of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) ClinproTM XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) and the conventional GIC Vidrion R (SS White, Gloucester, UK) in a 6-month follow-up. Subjects were required to have at least two teeth with dentin hypersensitivity. Teeth were divided at random into 2 groups, one group received Clinpro XT and the other conventional GIC Vidrion R. Treatments were assessed by tactile and air blast tests using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, after 20 minutes, and at 7, 15, 21, 30, 90 and 180 days post-treatment. Twenty subjects (152 teeth) were included. Both tests (tactile and air blast) showed a significant reduction of dentin hypersensitivity immediately after the application of Vidrion R and Clinpro XT (20 min). VAS scores obtained along the 6-month follow-up were statistically lower when compared to initial rates (p < 0.05). Both GIC were able to reduce dentin hypersensitivity up to 6-month post-treatment period without statistically significant differences among them (p > 0.05). Both cements provided satisfactory results in long-term dental sensitivity reduction.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000100203&lng=en&tlng=enDentin SensitivityDentin Desensitizing AgentsGlass Ionomer CementsRandomized Controlled Trial
spellingShingle Marina de Matos MADRUGA
Adriana Fernandes da SILVA
Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da ROSA
Evandro PIVA
Rafael Guerra LUND
Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial
Brazilian Oral Research
Dentin Sensitivity
Dentin Desensitizing Agents
Glass Ionomer Cements
Randomized Controlled Trial
title Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements a randomized clinical trial
topic Dentin Sensitivity
Dentin Desensitizing Agents
Glass Ionomer Cements
Randomized Controlled Trial
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000100203&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT marinadematosmadruga evaluationofdentinhypersensitivitytreatmentwithglassionomercementsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT adrianafernandesdasilva evaluationofdentinhypersensitivitytreatmentwithglassionomercementsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wellingtonluizdeoliveiradarosa evaluationofdentinhypersensitivitytreatmentwithglassionomercementsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT evandropiva evaluationofdentinhypersensitivitytreatmentwithglassionomercementsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT rafaelguerralund evaluationofdentinhypersensitivitytreatmentwithglassionomercementsarandomizedclinicaltrial