Bogency and Goodacies: On Argument Quality in Virtue Argumentation Theory
Virtue argumentation theory (VAT) has been charged of being incomplete, given its alleged inability to account for argument cogency in virtue-theoretical terms. Instead of defending VAT against that challenge, I suggest it is misplaced, since it is based on a premise VAT does not endorse, and raises...
Main Author: | Fabio Paglieri |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4209 |
Similar Items
-
Bogency and Goodacies: On Argument Quality in Virtue Argumentation Theory
by: Fabio Paglieri
Published: (2015-03-01) -
In Defence of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument Appraisal
by: Andrew Aberdein
Published: (2014-02-01) -
In Defence of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument Appraisal
by: Andrew Aberdein
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Virtue and Argument: Taking Character Into Account
by: Tracy Bowell, et al.
Published: (2013-03-01) -
Virtue and Argument: Taking Character Into Account
by: Tracy Bowell, et al.
Published: (2013-03-01)